Contradicting potential climate misinformation during televised debates

References

1. Beck Nielsen, Søren
   2023a “Orchestration of Perspectives in Televised Climate Change Debates.” Discourse & Society (: –. 10.1177/09579265221117015
   https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221117015 [Google Scholar]
2. Beck Nielsen, Søren
   2023b “”There’s New Technology here that Can Perform Miracles”: The Discursive Psychology of Technological Optimism in Climate Change Policy Debates.” Journal of Language and Politics (: –. 10.1075/jlp.23035.nie
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23035.nie [Google Scholar]
3. Burke, Shani, and Mirko A. Demasi
   2019 “Applying Discursive Psychology to ‘Fact’ Construction in Political Discourse.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass (): 10.1111/spc3.12449
   https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12449 [Google Scholar]
4. Clayman, Steven E.
   2002 “Disagreements and Third Parties: Dilemmas of Neutralism in Panel News Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00070‑X
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00070-X [Google Scholar]
5. Clayman, Steven E.
   2013 “Agency in Response: The Role of Prefatory Address Term.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.001 [Google Scholar]
6. Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage
   2002 The News Interview. Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
7. Clayman, Steven E., and Matthew P. Fox
   2017 “Hardballs and Softballs: Modulating Adversarialness in Journalistic Questioning.” Journal of Language and Politics (: –. 10.1075/jlp.16.1.02cla
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16.1.02cla [Google Scholar]
8. Climate Change
   Climate Change 2022 “Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability.” Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cook, John, Stephan Lewandowsky, and Ullrich K. H. Ecker
   2017 “Neutralizing Misinformation through Inoculation: Exposing Misleading Argumentation Techniques Reduces their Influence.” PLoS ONE, (): e0175799. 10.1371/journal.pone.0175799
   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799 [Google Scholar]
10. Cook, John, Peter Ellerton, and David Kinkhead
    2018 “Deconstructing Climate Misinformation to Identify Reasoning Errors.” Environ. Res. Lett. : . 10.1088/1748‑9326/aaa49f
    https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa49f [Google Scholar]
11. Demasi, Mirko A.
    2020 “Facts as Social Action in Political Debates about the European Union.” Political Psychology (: –. 10.1111/pops.12496
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12496 [Google Scholar]
12. Demasi, Mirko A.
    2019 “Post-truth Politics and Discursive Psychology.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass (): . 10.1111/spc3.12556
    https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12556 [Google Scholar]
13. Emmertsen, Sofie
    2007 “Interviewers’ Challenging Questions in British Debate Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics (: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.011 [Google Scholar]
14. Farrell, Justin, Kathryn McConnell, and Robert Brulle
    2019 “Evidence-Based Strategies to Combat Scientific Misinformation.” Nature Climate Change: –. 10.1038/s41558‑018‑0368‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0368-6 [Google Scholar]
15. Goffman, Erving
    1983 “Felicity’s Condition.” American Journal of Sociology (: –. 10.1086/227833
    https://doi.org/10.1086/227833 [Google Scholar]
16. Greatbatch, David
    1992 “On the Management of Disagreement between News Interviewees.” InTalk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. byPaul Drew, and John Heritage, –. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Heinemann, Trine, and Jakob Steensig
    2018 “Justifying Departures from Progressivity: The Turn-Initial Particle altså.” InBetween Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages, ed. byJohn Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.31.15hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.31.15hei [Google Scholar]
18. Heinemann, Trine, Anna Lindström, and Jakob Steensig
    2011 “Adressing Epistemic Incongruence in Question-Answer Sequences through the Use of Epistemic Adverbs.” InThe Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. byTanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, –. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.006 [Google Scholar]
19. Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
    2010 Talk in Action: Interaction, Identities, and Institutions. Hoboken: Wiley. 10.1002/9781444318135
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135 [Google Scholar]
20. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. byGene Lerner, –. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
21. Kendon, Adam
    2004 Gesture: Visible action as Utterance. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
22. Krange, Olve, Bjørn P. Kaltenborn, and Martin Hultman
    2021 “”Don’t Confuse me with Facts” – How Right Wing Populism Affects Trust in Agencies Advocating Anthropogenic Change as a Reality.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications: . 10.1057/s41599‑021‑00930‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00930-7 [Google Scholar]
23. Kurz, Tim, Martha Augoustinos, and Shona Crabb
    2010 “Contesting the ‘National Interest’ and Maintaining ‘our Lifestyle’: A Discursive Analysis of Political Rhetoric around Climate Change.” British Journal of Social Psychology: –. 10.1348/014466609X481173
    https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X481173 [Google Scholar]
24. Kurz, Tim, and Annayah M. B. Prosser
    2021 “Understanding the Social Dynamics of Climate Change through Analyses of Discourse.” Current Opinion of Psychology: –. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.03.010 [Google Scholar]
25. Lamb William, F., Giulio Mattoli, Sebastian Levi, J. Timmons Roberts, Stuart Capstick, Felix Creutzig, Jan C. Minx, Finn Müller-Hansen, Trevor Culhane, and Julia, K. Steinberger
    2020 “Discourses of Climate Delay.” Global Sustainability, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lewandowsky, Stephan
    2021 “Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It.” Annu. Rev. Public Health. (), –. 10.1146/annurev‑publhealth‑090419‑102409. Epub2021 Dec 23. PMID: 33355475.
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102409 [Google Scholar]
27. Markowitz, Ezra M., and Meaghan, L. Guckian
    2018 “Climate Change Communication: Challenges, Insights, and Opportunities.” InPsychology and Climate change: Human perceptions, impacts, and responses, ed. bySusan Clayton, and Christie Manning, –. Amsterdam: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑813130‑5.00003‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813130-5.00003-5 [Google Scholar]
28. Painter, James
    2023 “Climate Change: Multi-Country Media Analysis Shows Scepticism of the Basic Science is Dying Out.” The Conversation: https://theconversation.com/climate-change-multi-country-media-analysis-shows-scepticism-of-the-basic-science-is-dying-out-198303
    [Google Scholar]
29. Petersen, Alexander Michael, Emmanuel M. Vincent, and Anthony LeRoy Westerling
    2019 “Discrepancy in Scientific Authority and Media Visibility of Climate Change Scientists and Contrarians.” Nature Communications, . 10.1038/s41467‑019‑09959‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09959-4 [Google Scholar]
30. Sacks, Harvey
    1987 “On Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Conversation.” InTalk and Social Organisation, ed. byGraham Button, and John R. E. Lee, –. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781800418226‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800418226-004 [Google Scholar]
31. Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language (), –. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
32. Sandager Sørensen, Søren
    . “The Prosody of Response Tokens in Danish.” PhD diss, Århus University 2020 https://pure.au.dk/portal/files/209772407/Soerensen_2020_The_Prosody_of_Response_Tokens_in_Danish_Thesis_report_only.pdf
33. Schäfer, Mike S., and James Painter
    2021 “Climate Journalism in a Changing Media Ecosystem: Assessing the Production of Climate Change-Related News around the World.” WIREs Climate Change (): 10.1002/wcc.675
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.675 [Google Scholar]
34. Schegloff Emmanuel, A.
    1997 “Whose Text? Whose Context?” Discourse and Society (: –. 10.1177/0957926597008002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008002002 [Google Scholar]
35. Schegloff
    Schegloff (1988) “From Interview to Confrontation: Observations of the Bush/Rather Encounter.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351818809389304
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818809389304 [Google Scholar]
36. Treen, Kathie M. d’l., Hywel T. P. Williams, and Saffron J. O’Neill
    2020 “Online Misinformation about Climate Change.” WIREs Climate Change. 10.1002/wcc.665
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.665 [Google Scholar]
37. Van der Linden, Sander, Anthony Leiserowitz, Seth Rosenthal, and Edward Maibach
    2017 “Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change.” Global Challenges, . 10.1002/gch2.201600008
    https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600008 [Google Scholar]
38. Walker, Garreth
    2010 “The Phonetic Constitution of a Turn-Holding Practice: Rush-Throughs in English Talk-in-Interaction.” InProsody in Interaction, ed. byDagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, and Margret Selting, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.23.08wal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.08wal [Google Scholar]
39. Williams, Hywel T. P., James R. McMurray, Tim Kurz, and F. Hugo Lambert
    2015 “Network Analysis Reveals Open Forums and Echo Chambers in Social Media Discussions of Climate Change.” Global Environmental Change: –. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006 [Google Scholar]