Negotiating the value of rule of law through attitudinal positioning

References

1. Bednarek, M.
   2010 “Corpus Linguistics and Systemic Functional Linguistics: Interpersonal Meaning, Identity and Bonding in Popular Culture.” InNew Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation, eds. byBednarek Monica, and James R. Martin, –. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bilz, Kenworthey, and Janice Nadler
   2014 “Law, Moral Attitudes, and Behavioral Change.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law, eds. byEyal Zamir, and Doron Teichman, –. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chaemsaithong, Krisda
   2017 “Speech Reporting in Courtroom Opening Statements.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.08.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.08.003 [Google Scholar]
4. Cheng, Le, and Xiuli Liu
   2022 “Politics behind the Law: Unveiling the Discursive Strategies in Extradition Hearings on Meng Wanzhou.” International Journal of Legal Discourse(): –. 10.1515/ijld‑2022‑2072
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2022-2072 [Google Scholar]
5. Cheng, Le, and Marcel Danesi
   2019 “Exploring Legal Discourse: A Sociosemiotic (re)Construction.” Social Semiotics(): –. 10.1080/10350330.2019.1587841
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1587841 [Google Scholar]
6. Coffin, Caroline
   2006 Historical Discourse: The Language of Time, Cause and EvaluationLondon: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Coulthard, Malcolm and Johnson Alison
   (eds) 2010 The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203855607
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855607 [Google Scholar]
8. D’hondt, Sigurd
   2019 “Humanity and Its Beneficiaries: Footing and Stance-taking in an International Criminal Trial.” Signs and Society(): –. 10.1086/705279
   https://doi.org/10.1086/705279 [Google Scholar]
9. Daniel, Florence O., and Foluke O. Unuabonah
   2021 “Stance and Engagement in Selected Nigerian Supreme Court Judgments.” English Text Construction(): –. 10.1075/etc.21021.dan
   https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.21021.dan [Google Scholar]
10. Feng, Dezheng
    2023 Multimodal Chinese Discourse: Understanding Communication and Society in Contemporary China. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003130659
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003130659 [Google Scholar]
11. Feng, Dezheng, and Shuo Zhang
    2018 “Language, Attitudes and Party Politics: The Representation of Republicans and Democrats in Presidential Weekly Addresses.” Pragmatics and Society(): –. 10.1075/ps.16059.fen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16059.fen [Google Scholar]
12. Finegan, Edward, and Benjamin T. Lee
    2010 “Legal Writing: Attitude and Emphasis: Corpus Linguistic Approaches to ‘Legal Language’: Adverbial Expression of Attitude and Emphasis in Supreme Court Opinions.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, eds. byMalcolm Coulthard, and Johnson Alison, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203855607.ch5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855607.ch5 [Google Scholar]
13. Gibbons, John
    2003 Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Guillén-Nieto, Victoria, and Dieter Stein
    (eds) 2021 Language as Evidence: Doing Forensic Linguistics. Springer Nature.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Harré, Rom, and Fathali Moghaddam
    2003 The Self and Others: Positioning Individuals and Groups in Personal, Political, and Cultural Contexts. London: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Harré, Rom, and Luk Van Langenhove
    1999 The Positioning Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Heffer, Chris
    2005 The Language of Jury Trial: A Corpus-Aided Analysis of Legal-Lay Discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230502888
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502888 [Google Scholar]
19. Heffer, Chris
    2012 “Narrative Navigation: Narrative Practices in Forensic Discourse.” Narrative Inquiry (): –. 10.1075/ni.22.2.04hef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.22.2.04hef [Google Scholar]
20. Heydon, Georgina
    2019 Researching Forensic Linguistics: Approaches and Applications, London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429290640
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429290640 [Google Scholar]
21. Hobbs, Pamela
    2003 “‘Is That What We’re Here About?’:A Lawyer’s Use of Impression Management in a Closing Argument at Trial.” Discourse & Society (: –.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hood, Susan
    2010 Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230274662
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274662 [Google Scholar]
23. Huan, Changpeng, Menghan Deng, and Napak-on Sritrakarn
    2021 “The Bangkok Blast as a Finger-Pointing Blame Game: How Attitudinal Positioning Construes a Divided Polity.” Journal of Language and Politics(): –. 10.1075/jlp.20014.hua
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20014.hua [Google Scholar]
24. Liao, Meizhen
    2006 “A Study on ‘Formulation’ in Chinese Courtroom Interaction.” Foreign Language Research ():–.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Liebman, Benjamin L., Margaret Roberts, Rachel E. Stern and Alice Wang
    2020 “Mass Digitization of Chinese Court Decisions: How to Use Text as Data in the Field of Chinese Law”, Journal of Law & Courts ():–. 10.1086/709916
    https://doi.org/10.1086/709916 [Google Scholar]
26. Liu, Aiying
    1999 New Legal Documents Models. Beijing: Law Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Liu, Sida, and Terence C. Halliday
    2016 Criminal Defense in China: The Politics of Lawyers at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316677230
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316677230 [Google Scholar]
28. Luo, Haocai and Gongde Song
    2004 “The Construction of Public Law in a Harmonious Society.” Chinese Jurisprudence ():–.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Martin, James R.
    2004 “Mourning: How We Get Aligned.” Discourse and Society(): –. 10.1177/0957926504041022
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041022 [Google Scholar]
30. Martin, James R., and David Rose
    2007 Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Martin, James R., and Peter, White P. R.
    2005 The Language of Evaluation. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
32. Mühlhahn, Klaus
    2009 Criminal Justice in China: A History. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Obeng, Gyasi Samuel
    1997 “Communication Strategies: Persuasion and Politeness in Akan Judicial Discourse.” Text & Talk(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Olsson, John
    2008 Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language, Crime and the Law. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Poole, Robert
    2021 “A Corpus-aided Study of Stance Adverbs in Judicial Opinions and the Implications for English for Legal Purposes Instruction.” English for Specific Purposes:–. 10.1016/j.esp.2021.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.01.002 [Google Scholar]
36. Rosulek, Felton L.
    2009 The Sociolinguistic Construction of Reality in the Closing Arguments of Criminal Trial. Urbana: University of Illinois.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Shavell, Steven
    2002 “Law versus Morality as Regulators of Conduct.” American Law and Economics Review (: –. 10.1093/aler/4.2.227
    https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/4.2.227 [Google Scholar]
38. Shi, Chunxu
    2019 “On Multimodal Designing for the Identity Construction of Public Prosecutors from the Perspective of Individuation.” Modern Foreign Languages(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Shi, Guang
    2016 “A Study on Attitude in Chinese Courtroom Discourse.” Modern Foreign Languages (: –.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Stygall, Gail
    1994 Trial Language: Differential Discourse Processing and Discursive Formation. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.26
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.26 [Google Scholar]
41. Van Dijk, Teun. A.
    1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Wang, Zhenhua, and Chunxu Shi
    2016 “Nominalization and Its Effects on Discourse: Technicalization, Rationalization and Interpersonalization.” Modern Foreign Languages (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Wan, Yi, Yongzhong Tan and Tian Xie
    2016 “A Practical Exploration and Legal Analysis of Judicial Transparency: A Case Study of the Reform of G City People’s Procuratorate.” Chinese Journal of Criminal Law ():–.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Wang, Chunli, and Jiangao Jiang
    2015 “The Role Positioning of Public Prosecutors in Criminal Proceedings.” Beijing Social Science ():–.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Yuan, Chuanyou
    2019 “A Battlefield or a Lecture Hall? A Contrastive Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Courtroom Trials.” Social Semiotics(): –. 10.1080/10350330.2018.1504653
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504653 [Google Scholar]
46. Zappavigna, M., and James R. Martin
    2018 Discourse and Diversionary Justice: An Analysis of Youth Justice Conferencing. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑63763‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63763-1 [Google Scholar]