1887
image of “Why does he appear so ordinary, but he can be so confident”
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Adopting proximization theory as its analytical framework, this article examines the feminist discourse of controversial Chinese talk show performer Yang Li. Yang’s talk show is known for her incisive and sarcastically humorous remarks on men, and her speeches have aroused widespread controversies. Our analysis finds that by positioning herself and other women as the inside deictic-centers (IDCs) within her constructed discourse space, Yang tactically presents the spatial, temporal and axiological proximization from the outside deictic-centers (ODCs) mainly composed of men. Yang’s version of the controversial feminism has revealed gender inequality and conventional patriarchy in contemporary society; but the reliance on male- and class-based gender stereotypes and the imagery projected from past incidents to create gendered or even men-hating discourses has begot controversies and backlashes. This study also discusses how Yang’s controversial feminist discursive patterns are influenced by the platformization of daily life, and the commodification and entertainmentization of gender issues against the backdrop of contemporary Chinese society where neoliberalism, market, capital and convention coexist.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.23059.wan
2024-10-10
2025-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barlow, Tani
    2004The Question of Women in Chinese Feminism. Durham: Duke University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cap, Piotr
    2008 “Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse.” Journal of Pragmatic (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2013Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/pbns.232
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.232 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2015 “Crossing symbolic distances in political discourse space: Evaluative rhetoric within the framework of proximization.” Critical Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1080/17405904.2015.1013481
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1013481 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2021 “On the development of the social-linguistic nexus in discourse research: A critical review.” Pragmatics and Society (): –. 10.1075/ps.19056.cap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.19056.cap [Google Scholar]
  6. 2022 “Virtual dialogues in monologic political discourse: Constructing privileged and oppositional future in political speeches.” Pragmatics and Society (): –. 10.1075/ps.21027.cap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21027.cap [Google Scholar]
  7. Chamberlain, Prudence
    2017The Feminist Fourth Wave: Affective Temporality. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑53682‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53682-8 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Dan and Gengsong Gao
    2023 “The transgressive rhetoric of standup comedy in China.” Critical Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1080/17405904.2021.1968450
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1968450 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Eva
    2016 “Power femininity” and popular women’s magazines in China.” International Journal of communication: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chilton, Paul
    2004Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dai, Jinhua
    2002 “Redemption and Consumption: Depicting Culture in the 1990s.” InCinema and Desire: Feminist Marxism and Cultural Politics in the Work of Dai Jinhua, ed, byTani E. Barlow and Jing Wang, –. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Descartes, René
    1641Meditations on First Philosophy. Paris: Michael Soly.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Frith, Katherine and Yang Feng
    2009 “Transnational cultural flows: An analysis of women’s magazines in China.” Chinese Journal of Communication(): –. 10.1080/17544750902826681
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750902826681 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gu, Liping
    2020 “Man-mocking comedian accused of being ‘sexist’, but who is the joke on?” Ecns.cn. AccessedJanuary 30 2023. www.ecns.cn/m/news/society/2020-12-29/detail-ihafcxvt0505973.shtml
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Guo, Jingyi, Zhang Ziwei, Song Jinhong, Jin Lu, Yu Duan and Sara Liao
    2022 “Femvertising and Postfeminist Discourse: Advertising to Break Menstrual Taboos in China.” Women’s Studies in Communication (): –. 10.1080/07491409.2022.2053624
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2022.2053624 [Google Scholar]
  16. Harvey, David
    1990 “Between space and time: reflections on the geographical imagination1.” Annals of the association of American geographers (): –. 10.1111/j.1467‑8306.1990.tb00305.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1990.tb00305.x [Google Scholar]
  17. 2007A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ho, Wing Shan
    2022 “Chinese Supermom: Re-domesticating women in reality TV shows.” Feminist media studies (): –. 10.1080/14680777.2021.1913433
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1913433 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jammer, Max
    1994Concepts of space: The history of theories of space in physics. Canada: General Publishing Company
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2007 “Concepts of Time in Physics: A Synopsis”. Physics in Perspective. (): –. 10.1007/s00016‑007‑0349‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-007-0349-z [Google Scholar]
  21. Kant, Immanuel
    1781Critique of Pure Reason. Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lazar, Michelle M.
    2009 “Entitled to consume: Postfeminist femininity and a culture of post-critique.” Discourse & communication (): –. 10.1177/1750481309343872
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481309343872 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2005 “Politicizing gender in discourse: Feminist critical discourse analysis as political perspective and praxis.” InFeminist Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. byMichelle M. Lazar, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230599901_1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901_1 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lazar, Michelle M. and Lixin Wan
    2022 “Remediatisation, media interdiscursivity and ideological ambivalence in online news reports on sexual assault.” Discourse, Context & Media: 100620. 10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100620
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100620 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lin, Chun, Liu Bohong and Jin Yihong
    1998 “China.” InA Companion to Feminist Philosophy, ed. byAlison M. Jaggar and Iris Marion Young, –. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, Fengshu
    2014 “From degendering to (re) gendering the self: Chinese youth negotiating modern womanhood.” Gender and Education (): –. 10.1080/09540253.2013.860432
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.860432 [Google Scholar]
  27. Looft, Ruxandra
    2017 “# girlgaze: Photography, fourth wave feminism, and social media advocacy.” Continuum (): –. 10.1080/10304312.2017.1370539
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2017.1370539 [Google Scholar]
  28. Meng, Bingchun and Yanning Huang
    2017 “Patriarchal capitalism with Chinese characteristics: gendered discourse of ‘Double Eleven’ shopping festival.” Cultural Studies (): –. 10.1080/09502386.2017.1328517
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1328517 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nartey, Mark
    2021 “A feminist critical discourse analysis of Ghanaian feminist blogs”. Feminist Media Studies (): –. 10.1080/14680777.2020.1837910
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1837910 [Google Scholar]
  30. Peng, Altman Yuzhu
    2021 “Neoliberal feminism, gender relations, and a feminized male ideal in China: A critical discourse analysis of Mimeng’s WeChat posts.” Feminist Media Studies (): –. 10.1080/14680777.2019.1653350
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1653350 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2022 “Digital nationalism versus gender politics in post-reform China: Gender-issue debates on Zhihu.” Global Media and Communication (): –. 10.1177/17427665221125537
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665221125537 [Google Scholar]
  32. Qiao, Fei and Ye Wang
    2022 “The myths of beauty, age, and marriage: femvertising by masstige cosmetic brands in the Chinese market.” Social Semiotics (): –. 10.1080/10350330.2019.1682279
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1682279 [Google Scholar]
  33. Spearman, Charles
    1904 “General intelligence objectively determined and measured.” American Journal of Psychology: –. 10.2307/1412107
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107 [Google Scholar]
  34. 1927 “The measurement of intelligence.” Nature: –. 10.1038/120577a0
    https://doi.org/10.1038/120577a0 [Google Scholar]
  35. Tajfel, Henri
    1979 “Individuals and groups in social psychology.” British Journal of social and clinical psychology (): –. 10.1111/j.2044‑8260.1979.tb00324.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1979.tb00324.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Thurstone, Louis L.
    1928 “Attitudes can be measured.” American journal of Sociology (): –. 10.1086/214483
    https://doi.org/10.1086/214483 [Google Scholar]
  37. Torgerson, Warren S.
    1952 “Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method.” Psychometrika (): –. 10.1007/BF02288916
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288916 [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, Bin and Catherine Driscoll
    2019 “Chinese feminists on social media: Articulating different voices, building strategic alliances.” Continuum (): –. 10.1080/10304312.2018.1532492
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2018.1532492 [Google Scholar]
  39. Wesoky, Sharon R.
    2012 “Harmony and Critique: Chinese Modernity, Harmonious Society, and Contemporary Chinese Feminist Perspectives.” InChina’s Rise to Power: Conceptions of State Governance, ed. byTse-Hei Joseph Lee, Nedilsky, Lida V. and Cheung Siu-Keung, –. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137276742_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276742_3 [Google Scholar]
  40. Wodak, Ruth
    2001 “The discourse-historical approach”. InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, –. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Woelfel, Joseph and Edward L. Fink
    1980 “The measurement of communication processes: Galileo theory and method.”
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu, Angela Xiao and Yige Dong
    2019 “What is made-in-China feminism (s)? Gender discontent and class friction in post-socialist China.” Critical Asian Studies (): –. 10.1080/14672715.2019.1656538
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2019.1656538 [Google Scholar]
  43. Yang, Fan
    2020 “Post-feminism and chick flicks in China: Subjects, discursive origin and new gender norms.” Feminist Media Studies–.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Young, Gale and Aiston Scott. Householder
    1938 “Discussion of a set of points in terms of their mutual distances.” Psychometrika (): –. 10.1007/BF02287916
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287916 [Google Scholar]
  45. Zheng, Shiyu and Min Xu
    2022 “From leftover women to cuihun–audience reception of TV representation on marriageable single women in China.” Feminist Media Studies (): –. 10.1080/14680777.2022.2077796
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2022.2077796 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.23059.wan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.23059.wan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: controversial feminism ; talk show ; IDCs/ODCs ; STA model ; proximization ; yang
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error