1887
image of You have no right!
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present study seeks to reconsider popular assumptions regarding the dynamics of power in interpersonal interactions in light of data from an historical North American speech community. Specifically, I examine directive and commissive speech act formulations in colonial Spanish Louisiana data, both in terms of the level of directness employed in their head acts as well as the degree of tentativeness which accompanies them. The corpus for the study consists of 200 institutional letters composed in two settlements of the Louisiana territory between 1778 and 1802. Study findings reveal that speakers in Spanish Louisiana showed a clear preference for directly formulated speech acts, but that the level of tentativeness used in this period was highly dependent on the relative power of the speaker in the interaction. The results thus call into question traditional notions of the ‘rights’ speakers possess to issue certain types of speech acts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.23089.kin
2024-10-10
2025-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arellano, Silvia
    2000 “A Hierarchy of Requests in California Spanish: Are Indirectness and Mitigation Polite?” InResearch on Spanish in the U.S.: Linguistic Issues and Challenges, ed. byAna Roca, –. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bilbow, Grahame T.
    2002 “Commissive Speech Act Use in Intercultural Business Meetings.” International Review of Applied Linguistics: –. 10.1515/iral.2002.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2002.014 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
    1989 “Playing it Safe: The Role of Conventionality in Indirectness.” InCross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. byShoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper, –. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Juliane House
    1989 “Cross-Cultural and Situational Variation in Requesting Behavior.” InCross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. byShoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper, –. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
    1989Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1978 “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” InQuestions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, ed. byEsther Goody, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman
    1960 “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” InStyle in Language, ed. byThomas A. Sebeok, –. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.1515/9783110805376.252
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805376.252 [Google Scholar]
  9. Caffi, Claudia
    2007Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00392‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00392-8 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chodorowska-Pilch, Marianna
    2004 “The Conditional: A Grammaticalised Marker of Politeness in Spanish.” InCurrent Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, ed. byRosina Márquez Reiter, and María E. Placencia, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.123.08cho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.123.08cho [Google Scholar]
  11. Company, Concepción
    1985–1986 “Los futuros en el español medieval: sus orígenes y su evolución.” Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica (): –. 10.24201/nrfh.v34i1.1795
    https://doi.org/10.24201/nrfh.v34i1.1795 [Google Scholar]
  12. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Marina Terkourafi
    2017 “Pragmatic Approaches (Im)politeness.” InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. byJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Daniel Z. Kádár, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Curcó, Carmen
    1998 “¿No me harías un favorcito?: reflexiones en torno a la expresión de la cortesía verbal en el español de México y el español peninsular.” Diálogos Hispánicos: –. 10.1163/9789004655645_007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004655645_007 [Google Scholar]
  14. Din, Gilbert C.
    1988The Canary Islanders of Louisiana. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dwyer, Judith
    1993The Business Communication Handbook, 3rd ed. Newcastle, NSW: Managing Business Communication.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, Rod
    1994The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Faerch, Claus, and Gabriele Kasper
    1989 “Internal and External Modification in Interlanguage Request Realization.” Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. byShoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper, –. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fairclough, Norman
    1989Language and Power. London: Longman. 10.4324/9781315838250
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838250 [Google Scholar]
  19. Félix-Brasdefer, J. César
    2003 “Declining an Invitation: A Cross-Cultural Study of Pragmatic Strategies in American English and Latin American Spanish.” Multilingua: –. 10.1515/mult.2003.012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2003.012 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2005 “Indirectness and Politeness in Mexican Requests.” Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. byDavid Eddington, –. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2006 “Linguistic Politeness in Mexico: Refusal Strategies among Male Speakers of Mexican Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2007 “Natural Speech vs. Elicited Data: A Comparison of Natural and Role Play Requests in Mexican Spanish.” Spanish in Context (): –. 10.1075/sic.4.2.03fel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.4.2.03fel [Google Scholar]
  23. French, John R. P., and Bertram H. Raven
    1959 “The Bases of Social Power.” InGroup Dynamics: Research and Theory, ed. byDorwin Cartwright, and Alvin Zander, –. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. García, Carmen
    1992 “Refusing an Invitation: A Case of Peruvian Style.” Hispanic Linguistics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1993 “Making a Request and Responding to it: A Case Study of Peruvian Spanish Speakers.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90085‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90085-4 [Google Scholar]
  26. 1999 “The Three Stages of Venezuelan Invitations and Responses.” Multilingua (): –. 10.1515/mult.1999.18.4.391
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1999.18.4.391 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2007 “‘Ché, mirá, vos sabés que no voy a poder’: How Argentineans Refuse an Invitation.” Hispania (): –. 10.2307/20063564
    https://doi.org/10.2307/20063564 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hassall, Tim
    1999 “Request Strategies in Indonesian.” Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/prag.9.4.02has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.4.02has [Google Scholar]
  29. Haverkate, Henk
    1979Impositive Sentences in Spanish: Theory and Description in Linguistic Pragmatics. Amsterdam: North Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 1994La cortesía verbal: Estudio pragmalingüístico. Madrid: Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Holtgraves, Thomas
    1986 “Language Structure in Social Interaction: Perceptions of Direct and Indirect Speech Acts and Interactants who Use Them.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (): –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.51.2.305
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.305 [Google Scholar]
  32. Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe
    2015Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work, 2nd ed.New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315750231
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750231 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hurley, Joni Kay
    1995 “Pragmatics in a Language Contact Situation: Verb Forms Used in Requests in Ecuadorian Spanish.” Hispanic Linguistics: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kádár, Daniel, and Sara Mills
    2013 “Rethinking ‘Discernment’.” Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0007 [Google Scholar]
  35. King, Jeremy
    2009 “Societal Change and Language History in Cervantes’ entremeses: The Status of the Golden Age vos.” Cervantes (): –. 10.3138/cervantes.29.1.167
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cervantes.29.1.167 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2010 “Pleas from the New World: The Structure of Directive Head Acts in Colonial Spanish Familiar Letters.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.11.2.04kin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.11.2.04kin [Google Scholar]
  37. 2011a “Power and Indirectness in Business Correspondence: Petitions in Colonial Louisiana Spanish.” Journal of Politeness Research: –. 10.1515/jplr.2011.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.013 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2011b “Variation through Time and Text Type: The Nature of Direct and Indirect Requests in Early Modern Spanish.” Spanish in Context (): –. 10.1075/sic.8.2.05kin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.8.2.05kin [Google Scholar]
  39. 2012 “Early Modern Spanish Request Modifications as Politeness Strategies: Implications for the Study of Register.” InNew Perspectives on (Im)politeness and Interpersonal Communication, ed. byLucía Fernández-Amaya , –. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2018 “Hasta perder la última gota de mi sangre: Variation in Commissive Speech Act Behavior in Colonial Louisiana Spanish.” InLanguage Variation and Contact-Induced Change: Spanish Across Space and Time, ed. byJeremy King, and Sandro Sessarego, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.340.07kin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.340.07kin [Google Scholar]
  41. 2019 “Commitment Fulfillment and Politeness: Commissive Speech Acts in Colonial Louisiana Spanish.” InPoliteness in Nineteenth-Century Europe, ed. byAnnick Paternoster, and Susan Fitzmaurice, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.299.05kin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.299.05kin [Google Scholar]
  42. Kissine, Mikhail
    2009 “Illocutionary Forces and What Is Said.” Mind & Language (): –. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2008.01356.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.01356.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Koike, Dale A.
    1992Language and Social Relationship in Brazilian Portuguese: The Pragmatics of Politeness. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 10.7560/765320
    https://doi.org/10.7560/765320 [Google Scholar]
  44. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman. 10.4324/9781315835976
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835976 [Google Scholar]
  45. Le Pair, Rob
    1996 “Spanish Request Strategies: A Cross-Cultural Analysis from an Intercultural Perspective.” Language Sciences (): –. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(96)00040‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(96)00040-X [Google Scholar]
  46. Márquez Reiter, Rosina
    2002 “A Contrastive Study of Conventional Indirectness in Spanish: Evidence from Peninsular and Uruguayan Spanish.” Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/prag.12.2.02mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.12.2.02mar [Google Scholar]
  47. Myhill, John
    1996 “The Development of the Strong Obligation System in American English.” American Speech (): –. 10.2307/455712
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455712 [Google Scholar]
  48. Olshtain, Elite
    1989 “Apologies Across Languages.” InCross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. byShoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper, –. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Penny, Ralph
    1991A History of the Spanish Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511992827
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511992827 [Google Scholar]
  50. Placencia, María E.
    1998 “Pragmatic Variation: Ecuadorian Spanish vs. Peninsular Spanish.” Spanish Applied Linguistics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Ruiz de Zarobe, Leyre
    2002 “Los actos de habla compromisivo-directivos en francés.” Cuadernos de Filología Francesa: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Ruiz de Zarobe, Yolanda
    2000 “La cortesía verbal en inglés: Implicaciones en el acto de habla de la oferta.” Sintagma: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Searle, John R.
    1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sedano, Mercedes
    2007 “Future Tense Expressions in Several Spanish Corpora.” InWorking with Spanish Corpora, ed. byGiovanni Parodi, –. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Smith, F. Todd
    2014Louisiana and the Gulf South Frontier: 1500–1821. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2002 “Managing Rapport in Talk: Using Rapport Sensitive Incidents to Explore the Motivational Concerns Underlying the Management of Relations.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00039‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00039-X [Google Scholar]
  57. Vine, Bernadette
    2004Getting Things Done at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.124
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.124 [Google Scholar]
  58. Visconti, Jacqueline
    2009 “Speech Acts in Legal Language: Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  59. Watts, Richard J.
    1991Power in Family Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110854787
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110854787 [Google Scholar]
  60. 2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.23089.kin
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.23089.kin
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: speech acts ; mitigation ; power ; louisiana ; tentativeness ; commissive ; spanish ; directive
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error