1887
image of Hair or fist
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In 2022, a protest movement in Iran was triggered by the death of a woman who had been arrested for not covering her hair in the way required by the government. The movement spread but was then squashed. Media coverage was intense and showed many images employing visual metaphors and metonymies, often in combination. While there are now many studies analyzing multimodal metaphors in political contexts, no study has, yet, dealt with the metaphors and metonymies used in the media during the 2022 protests. This study uses a framework proposed by Ruiz de Mendoza and colleagues (2002; 2014; 2020), to analyze the structural integration of metaphor and metonymy and their joint role in meaning-making during the protests. The analysis of nine images in social media including Instagram and X reveals that Iranian political groups strategically employed the blending of visual metaphors and metonymies to legitimize their own ideological positions and delegitimize opposing viewpoints. The findings highlight the complex interrelations and interactions between these multimodal devices, demonstrating their critical function in shaping political discourse and communicative intent.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.23113.hat
2026-01-05
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdel-Raheem, A.
    (2019) Pictorial Framing in Moral Politics: A Corpus-Based Experimental Study. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baercelona, A.
    (2000) Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin and new York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtiyar, M.
    (2017) The role of context in the formation of hijab ‘veiling’ metaphors in hijab billboards and posters in Iran. Metaphor and the Social World. (), –. 10.1075/msw.7.2.01bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.7.2.01bak [Google Scholar]
  4. Barthes, R.
    (1977) Image, music, text. London: Fontana Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bounegru, L., & Forceville, C.
    (2011) Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, (), –. 10.1177/1470357211398446
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357211398446 [Google Scholar]
  6. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2004) Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2005) Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230501706
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501706 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chilton, P.
    (2004) Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N.
    (2007) A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, (), –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2006.00331.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x [Google Scholar]
  10. El Refaie, E.
    (2003) Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication(): –. 10.1177/1470357203002001755
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001755 [Google Scholar]
  11. El Refaei, E.
    (2009) Metaphors in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. InC. Forceville, and E. Urios-Aparisi, (Eds.) (2009) Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110215366.3.173
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.3.173 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2019) Visual metaphors and embodiment in graphic illness narratives. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190678173.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190678173.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferber, M.
    (2007) A dictionary of literary symbols (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511481475
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481475 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Forceville, C.
    (1996) Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203272305
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203272305 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2006) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. InG. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Driven, and F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibàñez (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Application and Future Perspectives. (pp. –). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197761.5.379
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197761.5.379 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2008) Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. InR. Gibbs (Eds.), Metaphor and Thought, (pp. –). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.028
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.028 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2009b) Metonymy in visual and audio-visual discourse. InE. Ventola & A. J. Moya (Eds.), The World Told and the World Shown: Multisemiotic Issues. (pp. –). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Forceville, C., & N van de Laar
    (2019) Metaphors portraying right-wing politician Greet Wilders in Dutch political cartoons. InE. Hidalgo-Tenorio, M. Ángel Benítez-Castro, and F. de Cesare, eds., Populist Discourse: Critical Approaches to Contemporary Politics. (pp. –). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429026751‑18
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429026751-18 [Google Scholar]
  20. Goossens, L.
    (1990) Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hidalgo, D. L. & Kraljevic, M. B.
    (2011) Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse sources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, () 2011, –. 10.1075/rcl.9.1.08hid
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.08hid [Google Scholar]
  22. Honohan, I.
    (2008) Metaphors of solidarity. InT. Carver, & J. Picalo. (Eds.) Political language and metaphor: interpreting and changing the world. (pp. –) London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Izadi, D., & Dryden, S.
    (2024) Woman/life/freedom: The social semiotics behind the 2020 Iranian protest movement. Discourse, Context, & Media, . 10.1016/j.dcm.2024.100803
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2024.100803 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kazemian, R., & Hatamzadeh, S.
    (2025) From virus to visual metaphor Framing COVID-19 in Iranian Cartoons. Applied Linguistics Compass, (), –. 10.22034/alc.2025.222539
    https://doi.org/10.22034/alc.2025.222539 [Google Scholar]
  25. Koller, V.
    (2009) Brand images: Multimodal metaphor in cooperate branding messages. InCh Forceville & E. Uriós-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. –). Berlin/New York: Mouten de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110215366.2.45
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.2.45 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kövecses, Z.
    (2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kövecses, Z. & Radden, G.
    (1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kraljevic, M. B.
    (2009) Linguistic and pictorial metonymy in advertising. InValenzuela, A. Rojo. & Soriano, C. (Eds.), Trends in Cognitive Linguistics: Theoretical and Applied Models. (pp. –). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2009) The political mind: A cognitive scientist’s guide to your brain and its politics. New York: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Langacker, R. W.
    (1993) Reference-Point Constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mehrabi, T.
    (2022) Woman, Life, Freedom: On protests in Iran and why it is a feminist movement. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning. , (–). 10.7146/kkf.v34i1.134480
    https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v34i1.134480 [Google Scholar]
  34. Miró-Sastre, I.
    2018 Combining metaphors: from metaphoric amalgams to binary systems. Australian Journal of Linguistics. (), –. 10.1080/07268602.2018.1393860
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2018.1393860 [Google Scholar]
  35. Musolff, A.
    (2004) Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230504516
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ovejas Ramírez, C.
    (2023) Conceptual complexes in multimodal advertising. Cultura, Lenguaje y representación/Culture, Language and Representation. , –. 10.6035/clr.6977
    https://doi.org/10.6035/clr.6977 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pérez-Hernández, I.
    (2014) Cognitive grounding for cross-cultural commercial communication. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0015 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pérez Sobrino, P.
    (2017) Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ftl.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.2 [Google Scholar]
  39. Porto, M. D., & Romano, M.
    (2019) Transmodality in metaphors: Tides in Spanish social protest movements. InN. Ferrando (Eds.), Current Approaches to Metaphor Analysis in Discourse. (p.–). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110629460‑015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110629460-015 [Google Scholar]
  40. Radden, G.
    (2000) How metonymic are metaphors?InJ. L. Otal, I. Navarro, & B. Bellés (Eds.), Cognitive and Discourse Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. (pp. –). Castellón: Universitat Jaume I.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Romano, M., & Porto, M. D.
    (2018) The tide, change, nobody can stop it: Metaphor for social action. Discourse Society, (), pp. –. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26614969. 10.1177/0957926518802914
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518802914 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.
    (2000) The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads (pp. –). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. & Díez Velasco, O. I.
    (2002) Patterns of conceptual interaction. InR. Dirven & Pӧrings, R. (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. (pp. –). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219197.489
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.489 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
    (2011) Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/hcp.28
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2017) Metaphor and other cognitive operations in interaction: from basicity to complexity. InB. Hamp. (Eds.), Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse. (pp. –). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108182324.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182324.009 [Google Scholar]
  46. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. & Galera Masegosa, A.
    (2014) Cognitive Modeling: A Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/hcp.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.45 [Google Scholar]
  47. (2020) The metonymic exploitation of descriptive, attitudinal, and regulatory scenarios in meaning making. InA. Baicchi (Eds.), Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language. (pp. –). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ftl.9.12rui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.9.12rui [Google Scholar]
  48. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
    (2021) Conceptual complexes. InFuyin (Thomas) Li (Eds.), Distinguished Lectures in Cognitive Linguistics. (pp. –). Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004439221_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004439221_005 [Google Scholar]
  49. Semino, E.
    (2008) Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Šorm, E., & Steen, G.
    (2018) VISMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor identification. InG. Steen (Eds.), Visual Metaphors: Structure and Process, (pp. –). Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/celcr.18.03sor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.18.03sor [Google Scholar]
  51. Tapper, J.
    (2019) The Many Metaphors of Brexit. JSTOR Daily. https://daily.jstor.org/many-metaphors-brexit
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Urios-Aparisi, E.
    (2009) Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. InC. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi, (Eds.) (2009) Multimodal Metaphor. (pp. –). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110215366.2.95
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.2.95 [Google Scholar]
  53. Valli, E.
    (2023, June15). The symbolism of cut hair in Iranian protest posters. Graphéine. https://www.grapheine.com/en/graphic-design-en/symbolism-cut-hair-iranian-protest-posters
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Virág, Á.
    (2022) Multimodal conceptual patterns of Hungary in political cartoons. InR. Benczes & V. Szelid, (Eds.). Visual Metaphors. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/bct.124.10vir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.124.10vir [Google Scholar]
  55. Zeidan, A.
    (2023) Woman, Life, Freedom. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Woman-Life-Freedom
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.23113.hat
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.23113.hat
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: visual metaphor ; metaphor ; metonymy ; metaphtonymy ; multimodality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error