Reciprocity and epistemicity on screen-based interactions

References

1. Austin, J. L.
   1975 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Ayu, M.
   2020 “Online Learning: Leading E-Learning at Higher Education.” The Journal of English Literacy Education. 10.36706/jele.v7i1.11515
   https://doi.org/10.36706/jele.v7i1.11515 [Google Scholar]
3. Locher, Miriam A., and Brook Bolander
   2019 “Ethics in Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics1451: 83–90. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.011
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.011 [Google Scholar]
4. Borthwick, K.
   2020 “Treasuring and Preserving Languages: How the Inclusive Design in MOOCs Might Help.” InResearch-Publishing.net. 10.14705/rpnet.2020.40.1059
   https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2020.40.1059 [Google Scholar]
5. Bayne, S., M. S. Gallagher, and K. Lamb
   2014 “Being ‘At’ University: The Social Topologies of Distance Students.” Higher Education. 10.1007/s10734‑013‑9662‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9662-4 [Google Scholar]
6. Blitvich, P. G. C.
   2022 “Moral Emotions, Good Moral Panics, Social Regulation, and Online Public Shaming.” Language & Communication. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.02.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.02.002 [Google Scholar]
7. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Qian Kan
   2019 “Communicative Styles, Rapport, and Student Engagement: An Online Peer Mentoring Scheme.” Applied Linguistics. 10.1093/applin/amz035
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz035 [Google Scholar]
8. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Vittorio Tantucci
   2021 “The Principle of (Im)Politeness Reciprocity.” Journal of Pragmatics. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.008
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.008 [Google Scholar]
9. Culpeper, Jonathan, Samuel J. Oliver, and Vittorio Tantucci
   2021 “Politeness Reciprocity in Shakespeare’s Dialogue: The Case of Thanks.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics. 10.1075/jhp.00053.cul
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00053.cul [Google Scholar]
10. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2010 “Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007 [Google Scholar]
11. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2021 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1075/jlac.1.2.06silxxxx
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.1.2.06silxxxx [Google Scholar]
12. Cunha, G. X., and A. A. L. A. M. Oliveira
    2020 “Teorias de Im/Polidez Linguística: Revisitando o Estado da Arte para uma Contribuição Teórica sobre o Tema.” Estudos da Língua(gem). 10.22481/el.v18i2.6409
    https://doi.org/10.22481/el.v18i2.6409 [Google Scholar]
13. Ducrot, Oswald
    1980 “Analyses Pragmatiques.” Communications32 (1): 11–60. 10.3406/comm.1980.1481
    https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1980.1481 [Google Scholar]
14. Du Bois, John W.
    2007 “The Stance Triangle.” InStancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, edited byRobert Englebretson, 139–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
15. del Saz-Rubio, Ma Milagros
    2023 “Assessing Impoliteness-Related Language in Response to a Season’s Greeting Posted by the Spanish and English Prime Ministers on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.010 [Google Scholar]
16. Gibson, J. J.
    1977 “The Theory of Affordance.” InPerceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, edited byR. Shaw and J. Bransford, 67–82. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gourlay, Lesley
    2021 “There Is No Virtual Learning: The Materiality of Digital Education.” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research. 10.7821/naer.2021.1.649
    https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.649 [Google Scholar]
18. Green, N. C., H. Edwards, B. Wolodko, C. Stewart, M. Brooks, and R. Littledyke
    2010 “Reconceptualising Higher Education Pedagogy in Online Learning.” Distance Education. 10.1080/01587919.2010.513951
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2010.513951 [Google Scholar]
19. Heritage, John
    2002 “The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content.” Journal of Pragmatics. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00072‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3 [Google Scholar]
20. Herring, Susan C., and Jannis Androutsopoulos
    2015 “Computer-Mediated Discourse 2.0.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 127–51. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch6
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch6 [Google Scholar]
21. House, Juliane
    1989 “Politeness in English and German: The Functions of Please and Bitte.” InCross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, edited byShoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriel Kasper, 96–119. Norwood: N.J. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Juliane House
    2020 “Evaluating the Appropriacy of Using Ritual Frame Indicating Expressions (RFIEs) — A Case Study of Learners of Chinese and English.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics. 10.1515/lpp‑2020‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2020-0007 [Google Scholar]
23. Laurillard, D.
    2002 Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. 2nd ed.London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203160329
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203160329 [Google Scholar]
24. Martin-Monje, E., and K. Borthwick
    2021 “Researching Massive Open Online Courses for Language Teaching and Learning.” ReCALL. 10.1017/S0958344021000094
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000094 [Google Scholar]
25. Labinaz, Paolo, and Marina Sbisà
    2021 “The Problem of Knowledge Dissemination in Social Network Discussions.” Journal of Pragmatics. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.009 [Google Scholar]
26. Marques, J. P. C., and A. L. M. Oliveira
    2022 “Ensino de Língua Russa para Brasileiros: Diálogos com a Pragmática Linguística.” InEstudos Linguísticos Aplicados: Interlocuções na Contemporaneidade, edited byF. Meniconi, S. Makyama, and C. V. Pitombeira, 138–150. Tutóia: Diálogos.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Piazza, Roberta
    2002 “The Pragmatics of Conducive Questions in Academic Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00038‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00038-8 [Google Scholar]
28. Raymond, Chase Wesley, Rebecca Clift, and John Heritage
    2021 “Reference Without Anaphora: On Agency Through Grammar.” Linguistics. 10.1515/ling‑2021‑0058
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0058 [Google Scholar]
29. Scott, Kate
    2022 Pragmatics Online. London: Routledge. 10.4324/b22750
    https://doi.org/10.4324/b22750 [Google Scholar]
30. Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M.
    2008 Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures. London and New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Tagg, C., P. Seargeant, and A. A. Brown
    2017 Taking Offence on Social Media: Conviviality and Communication on Facebook. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑56717‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56717-4 [Google Scholar]
32. Taguchi, N.
    2015 “Contextually Speaking: A Survey of Pragmatic Learning Abroad, in Class, and Online.” System481: 3–20. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.001 [Google Scholar]
33. Tantucci, V.
    2013 “Interpersonal Evidentiality: The Mandarin V-䗷 Guo Construction and Other Evidential Systems Beyond the ‘Source of Information’.” Journal of Pragmatics571: 210–230. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.013 [Google Scholar]
34. Tantucci, Vittorio, and Aiqing Wang
    2021 “Resonance and Engagement Through (Dis-) Agreement: Evidence of Persistent Constructional Priming from Mandarin Naturalistic Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics1751: 94–111. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 [Google Scholar]
35. Tantucci, Vittorio, Aiqing Wang, and Jonathan Culpeper
    . “Reciprocity and Epistemicity: On the (Proto) Social and Cross-Cultural ‘Value’ of Information Transmission.” Journal of Pragmatics. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.04.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.04.012 [Google Scholar]
36. Terkourafi, Maria
    2005 “Beyond the Micro-Level of Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237 [Google Scholar]
37. Tantucci, Vittorio, and Aiqing Wang
    . “British Conversation Is Changing: Resonance and Engagement in the BNC1994 and the BNC2014.” Applied Linguistics. 10.1093/applin/amae040
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amae040 [Google Scholar]
38. Vladimirou, D., and J. House
    2018 “Ludic Impoliteness and Globalisation on Twitter: ‘I Speak England Very Best #Agglika_Tsipra, #Tsipras #Clinton’.” Journal of Pragmatics. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.005 [Google Scholar]
39. Vásquez, C.
    2021 “I Appreciate U Not Being a Total Prick…: Oppositional Stancetaking, Impoliteness and Relational Work in Adversarial Twitter Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.08.009 [Google Scholar]
40. Xie, Chaoqun, and Francisco Yus
    2018 “Introducing Internet Pragmatics.” Internet Pragmatics1 (1): 1–12. 10.1075/ip.00001.xie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00001.xie [Google Scholar]
41. Wenger, Etienne
    1998 “Communities of Practice: Learning as a Social System.” Systems Thinker9 (5): 2–3.
    [Google Scholar]