1887
image of Conflict, gender, and amount of talk
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present paper examines whether speakers’ gender affects how much they talk in conflictive discourse in Spanish — measured through number of words and number and mean length of interventions. We analyse role play data simulating two conflictive situations with varying levels of proximity between the participants. In addition to comparing female and male informants, we use a sociopsychological questionnaire to measure the informants’ conformity with traditional gender roles. Informants’ age was also analysed as an exploratory variable.

We found that both gender and gender role conformity correlated with different measures of amount of talk. In general, men produced more words and more interventions than women, while women produced longer interventions, and this effect was stronger for more gender-conforming women. The observed gender differences are partially attributable to different orientations towards the resolution of the conflict and — unexpectedly — to men’s more frequent use of interactional features.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.23144.ucl
2025-03-24
2025-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bäck, Hanna, and Marc Debus
    2019 “When Do Women Speak? A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Gender in Legislative Debates.” Political Studies (): –. 10.1177/0032321718789358
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718789358 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bäck, Hanna, Marc Debus, and Jochen Müller
    2014 “Who Takes the Parliamentary Floor? The Role of Gender in Speech-Making in the Swedish Riksdag.” Political Research Quarterly (): –. 10.1177/1065912914525861
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912914525861 [Google Scholar]
  3. Berger, Joseph, M. Hamit Fisek, Robert Z. Norman, and Morris Jr. Zelditch
    1977Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach. New York: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bou-Franch, Patricia
    2014 “An introduction to language aggression against women.” Language Aggression and Conflict (): –. 10.1075/jlac.2.2.00int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.2.2.00int [Google Scholar]
  5. Brescoll, Victoria L.
    2011 “Who Takes the Floor and Why: Gender, Power, and Volubility in Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly (): –. 10.1177/0001839212439994
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212439994 [Google Scholar]
  6. Briz, Antonio
    1998El Español Coloquial en La Conversación: Esbozo de Pragmagramática. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coates, Jennifer
    2004Women, Men and Language. New York: Pearson/Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Falbo, Toni and Letitia A. Peplau
    1980 “Power strategies in intimate relationships.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (): –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.38.4.618
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.618 [Google Scholar]
  9. Feldman, Adam, and Rebecca D. Gill
    2019 “Power Dynamics in Supreme Court Oral Arguments: The Relationship between Gender and Justice-to-Justice Interruptions.” Justice System Journal (): –. 10.1080/0098261X.2019.1637309
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2019.1637309 [Google Scholar]
  10. Félix-Brasdefer, J. César
    2018 “Role Plays”. InMethods in Pragmatics, ed. byA. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, and W. Bublitz, –. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110424928‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424928-012 [Google Scholar]
  11. Grimshaw, Allen Day
    ed. 1990Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Holmes, Janet
    1995Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. James, Deborah, and Janice Drakich
    1993 “Understanding Gender Differences in Amount of Talk: A Critical Review of Research.” InGender and conversational interaction, ed. byD. Tannen, –. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jarvis, Shoshana N., Charles R. Ebersole, Christine Q. Nguyen, Minwan Zhu, and Laura J. Kray
    2022 “Stepping Up to the Mic: Gender Gaps in Participation in Live Question-and-Answer Sessions at Academic Conferences.” Psychological Science (): –. 10.1177/09567976221094036
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221094036 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kachel, Sven, Melanie C. Steffens, and Claudia Niedlich
    2016 “Traditional Masculinity and Femininity: Validation of a New Scale Assessing Gender Roles.” Frontiers in Psychology. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00956
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00956 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lakoff, Robin
    1975Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
    Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics 2022 “ELAN”.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mehl, Matthias R., Simine Vazire, Nairán Ramírez-Esparza, Richard B. Slatcher, and James W. Pennebaker
    2007 “Are Women Really More Talkative Than Men?” Science (): –. 10.1126/science.1139940
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139940 [Google Scholar]
  19. Mills, Sara
    2005 “Gender and impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture (): –. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.263
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.263 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mulac, Anthony, James J. Bradac, and Pamela Gibbons
    2006 “Empirical Support for the Gender-as-Culture Hypothesis: An Intercultural Analysis of Male/Female Language Differences.” Human Communication Research (): –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.2001.tb00778.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00778.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Patton, Dana, and Joseph L. Smith
    2020 “Gender, Ideology, and Dominance in Supreme Court Oral Arguments.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy (): –. 10.1080/1554477X.2020.1738977
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2020.1738977 [Google Scholar]
  22. Pietromonaco, Paula R., Nickola C. Overall, Lindsey A. Beck, and Sally I. Powers
    2021 “Is Low Power Associated With Submission During Marital Conflict? Moderating Roles of Gender and Traditional Gender Role Beliefs.” Social Psychological and Personality Science (): –. 10.1177/1948550620904609
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620904609 [Google Scholar]
  23. Pillon, Agnesa, Catherine Degauquier, and François Duquesne
    1992 “Males’ and Females’ Conversational Behavior in Cross-Sex Dyads: From Gender Differences to Gender Similarities.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (): –. 10.1007/BF01068070
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068070 [Google Scholar]
  24. Plug, Ilona, Wyke Stommel, Peter L. B. J. Lucassen, Tim C. olde Hartman, Sandra Van Dulmen, and Enny Das
    2021 “Do Women and Men Use Language Differently in Spoken Face-to-Face Interaction? A Scoping Review.” Review of Communication Research: –. 10.12840/ISSN.2255‑4165.026
    https://doi.org/10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.026 [Google Scholar]
  25. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2022 “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing”.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rahim, M. Afzalur
    1983 “A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict.” Academy of Management Journal (): –. 10.2307/255985
    https://doi.org/10.2307/255985 [Google Scholar]
  27. RStudio Team
    RStudio Team 2022 “RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R”.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Salazar Benítez, Octavio
    2016 “The Fragility of Gender Equality Policies in Spain.” Social Sciences (): . 10.3390/socsci5020017
    https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5020017 [Google Scholar]
  29. Schauberger, Philipp, and Alexander Walker
    2019 “Openxlsx: Read, Write and Edit Xlsx Files”.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schmidt, Sarah J., and James R. A. Davenport
    2017 “Who Asks Questions at Astronomy Meetings?” Nature Astronomy():. 10.1038/s41550‑017‑0153
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0153 [Google Scholar]
  31. Tannen, Deborah
    1991You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Ballantine Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Telis, Natalie, Emily C. Glassberg, Jonathan K. Pritchard, and Chris Gunter
    2019 “Public Discussion Affects Question Asking at Academic Conferences.” The American Journal of Human Genetics (): –. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  33. Valentine, Patricia
    1995 “Management of conflict: Do nurses/women handle it differently?” Journal of Advanced Nursing (): –. 10.1046/j.1365‑2648.1995.22010142.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22010142.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, Vibeke
    2014 “Tracing Gender Differences in Parliamentary Debates: A Growth Curve Analysis of Ugandan MPs’ Activity Levels in Plenary Sessions, 1998–2008.” Representation (): –. 10.1080/00344893.2014.951234
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2014.951234 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wickham, Hadley, Romain François, Lionel Henry, and Kirill Müller
    2020 “Dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation”.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wickham, Hadley, and RStudio
    2022 “Stringr: Simple, Consistent Wrappers for Common String Operations”.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.23144.ucl
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.23144.ucl
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: gender ; role-play ; conflictive discourse ; gender-role conformity ; amount of talk
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error