Citizens’ polarised discourses on climate change and mobility

References

1. Alcíbar Cuello, Miguel
   2023 “Medioambiente y estudios del discurso.” InEstudios del Discurso. The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Language Discourse Studies, ed. byCarmen López-Ferreiro, Isolda E. Carranza, and Teun A. van Dijk, 287–301. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Blommaert, Jan, and Dong Jie
   2010 Ethnographic Fieldwork. A Beginner’s Guide. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692962
   https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692962 [Google Scholar]
3. Caimotto, M. Cristina
   2024 “Mobility Justice: An Ecolinguistic Perspective.” Languages91: 242. 10.3390/languages9070242
   https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9070242 [Google Scholar]
4. Chilton, Paul
   2004 Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
5. Criado Pérez, Caroline
   2019 La Mujer Invisible. Titivillus (digital edition).
   [Google Scholar]
6. Domínguez, Martí, Sara Moreno, and Tatiana Pina
   2022 “Unicorns, Donkeys and Elephants: the Battle on Climate Change in the United States of America as Reflected in Cartoons.” InDiscursive Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarization and Conflict, ed. byLaura Filardo-Llamas, Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, 215–234. London: Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Discursive-Approaches-to-Socio-political-Polarization-and-Conflict/Filardo-Llamas-Morales-Lopez-Floyd/p/book/9780367529253#
   [Google Scholar]
7. Doughty, Karolina, and Lesley Murray
   2016 “Discourses of Mobility: Institutions, Everyday Lives and Embodiment.” Mobilities11 (2): 303–322. 10.1080/17450101.2014.941257
   https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.941257 [Google Scholar]
8. Duranti, Alexandro
   1997 Antropología Lingüística. Madrid: Cambridge University Press 2000.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fairclough, Norman
   1989 Language and Power. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Filardo-Llamas, Laura, and Esperanza Morales-López
    2022 “Introduction.” InDiscursive Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarization and Conflict, ed. byLaura Filardo-Llamas, Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, 1–22. London: Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Discursive-Approaches-to-Socio-political-Polarization-and-Conflict/Filardo-Llamas-Morales-Lopez-Floyd/p/book/9780367529253#
    [Google Scholar]
11. Goffman, Erving
    1974 Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    2014 Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
13. Han, B.-Chul
    2021 Infocracia. La Digitalización y la Crisis de la Democracia. Buenos Aires: Penguin Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Herdt, T., & Muñoz Sanz, V.
    (2023) Experts as Game Changers? A Critical Discourse Analysis of Climate Measures in the Metropolitan Region of Amsterdam. Urban Planning8(2), 307-321. 10.17645/up.v8i2.6413
    https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i2.6413 [Google Scholar]
15. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980 Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Lakoff, George
    2004 Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
17. McIntyre, Lee
    2018 Posverdad. Madrid: Cátedra.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Montesano Montessori, Nicolina, and Esperanza Morales-López
    2015 “Multimodal Narrative as an Instrument for Social Change: Reinventing Democracy in Spain -the Case of 15M.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines (CADAAD)7 (2): 200–221. www.cadaad.net/journal
    [Google Scholar]
19. Morales-López, Esperanza
    2012 “Análisis de Discursos Ideológicos en la Empresa: La Deslegitimación y la Defensa de las Energías Renovables.” FORUM. Qualitative Social Research13 (3), 20. www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1864
    [Google Scholar]
20. Morales-López, Esperanza
    2017 “Cognitive Frames, Imaginaries and Discursive Constructions: Post 15M discourses with Reference to Eco-social Alternatives.” InDeveloping New Identities in Social Conflicts: Constructivist Perspectives on Discourse Studies, ed. byEsperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, 249–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.71.12mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.71.12mor [Google Scholar]
21. Morales-López, Esperanza
    2019 “Discourse Analysis: Constructivist Perspective and Transdisciplinarity.” InApplications of Complexity Theory in Language and Communication Sciences, ed. byAlbert Bastardas-Boada, Àngels Massip-Bonet, and Gemma Bel-Enguix, 187–205. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑04598‑2_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04598-2_11 [Google Scholar]
22. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
    1958 Tratado de la Argumentación. La Nueva Retórica. Madrid: Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Pujante, David
    2017 “The Discursive Construction of Reality in the Context of Rhetoric: Constructivist Rhetoric.” InDeveloping New Identities in Social Conflicts: Constructivist perspectives, ed. byEsperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, 41–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.71.03puj
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.71.03puj [Google Scholar]
24. Pujante, David
    2024 El Mundo en la Palabra. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Salvador, Vicent
    2022 “The Social Debate on Energy Sources.” InDiscursive Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarization and Conflict, ed. byLaura Filardo-Llamas, Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, 235–252. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Scollon, Ron, and Susanne Wong Scollon
    2001 Intercultural Communication. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Shi, Wen, Haohuan Fu, Peinan Wang, Changfeng Chen, and Jie Xiong
    2020 “#Climatechange vs. #Globalwarming: Characterizing Two Competing Climate Discourses on Twitter with Semantic Network and Temporal Analyses.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health171, 1062. 10.3390/ijerph17031062
    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031062 [Google Scholar]
28. van Dijk, Teun A.
    2003 Ideología y Discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
29. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
    2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. van Eemeren, Frans H.
    2018 Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95381‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6 [Google Scholar]
31. Verschueren, Jef
    2012 Ideology in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. White, Hayden
    1973 Metahistory. The Historical Imagination in the Ninetheenth Century in Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]