Foreign relations law as an interdiscursive continuum

References

1. Bhatia, Vijay K.
   1993 Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bhatia, Vijay K.
   2004 Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bhatia, Vijay K.
   2010 “Interdiscursivity in Professional Communication.” Discourse & Communication(): –. 10.1177/1750481309351208
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481309351208 [Google Scholar]
4. Bhatia, Vijay K.
   2017 Critical Genre Analysis: Investigating Interdiscursive Performance in Professional Practice. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bhatia, Vijay K.
   2023 “Legal Genres in Interdiscursive Contexts.” InResearch Handbook on Jurilinguistics, ed. byAnne Wagner, and Aleksandra Matulewska, –. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781802207248.00019
   https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802207248.00019 [Google Scholar]
6. Bradley, Curtis
   2019 “What Is Foreign Relations Law?” InThe Oxford Handbook of Comparative Foreign Relations Law, ed. byCurtis Bradley, –. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190653330.013.1
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190653330.013.1 [Google Scholar]
7. Bradley, Curtis
   2021 International Law in the U.S. Legal System (3rd Edition). New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Butler, Christopher
   2003 Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cai, Congyan
   2017 “Chinese Foreign Relations Law.” AJIL Unbound: –. 10.1017/aju.2017.91
   https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2017.91 [Google Scholar]
10. Cai, Congyan
    2019 “International Law in Chinese Courts.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Comparative Foreign Relations Law, ed. byCurtis Bradley, –. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190653330.013.31
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190653330.013.31 [Google Scholar]
11. Campbell, Neil, and Alasdair Kean
    1997 American Cultural Studies: An Introduction to American Culture. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cao, Deborah
    2009 “Illocutionary acts of Chinese legislative language.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.003 [Google Scholar]
13. Cheng, Le, and King Kui Sin
    2008 “A Court Judgment as Dialogue.” InDialogue and Rhetoric, ed. byEdda Weigand, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.2.21che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.2.21che [Google Scholar]
14. Cheng, Le, and Marcel Danesi
    2019 “Exploring Legal Discourse: A Sociosemiotic (Re)construction.” Social Semiotics(): –. 10.1080/10350330.2019.1587841
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1587841 [Google Scholar]
15. Cleveland, Sarah, and Paul Stephan
    2020 “Introduction: The Role of the Restatements in U.S. Foreign Relations Law.” InThe Restatement and Beyond: The Past, Present, and Future of U.S. Foreign Relations Law, ed. byPaul Stephan, and Sarah Cleveland, –. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197533154.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197533154.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. Cope, Kevin, Pierre-Hugues Verdier, and Mila Versteeg
    2021 “The Global Evolution of Foreign Relations Law.” American Journal of International Law(): –. 10.1017/ajil.2021.58
    https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2021.58 [Google Scholar]
17. Coulthard, Malcolm, Alison May, and Rui Sousa-Silva
    (eds) 2020 The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (2nd Edition). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dayter, Daria
    2016 Discursive Self in Microblogging: Speech Acts, Stories and Self-Praise. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.260
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.260 [Google Scholar]
19. De Tocqueville, Alexis
    1965 Democracy in America. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Deng, Liming, Tania Laghari, and Xiaoping Gao
    2021 “A Genre-Based Exploration of Intertextuality and Interdiscursivity in Advertorial Discourse.” English for Specific Purposes: –. 10.1016/j.esp.2020.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.11.003 [Google Scholar]
21. Dodge, William
    2017 “Jurisdiction in the Fourth Restatement of Foreign Relations Law.” 18 Yearbook of Private International Law: –. 10.2139/ssrn.2972612
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2972612 [Google Scholar]
22. Dong, Xiaobo, and Yafang Zhang
    2023 On the Standardization of Chinese Legislative Language. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑99‑2633‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2633-6 [Google Scholar]
23. Fotion, Nicholas
    1971 “Master Speech Acts.” Philosophical Quarterly(): –. 10.2307/2218128
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2218128 [Google Scholar]
24. Ge, Yunfeng, and Hong Wang
    2019 “Understanding the Discourse of Chinese Civil Trials: The Perspective of Critical Genre Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.024
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.024 [Google Scholar]
25. Global Times
    Global Times 2023 “The Foreign Relations Law Puts China’s Attitude on the Table: Global Times Editorial.” https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202306/1293454.shtml
26. Gong, Mingyu, Winnie Cheng, and Le Cheng
    2020 “Development of Deontic Modality in Chinese Civil Laws: A Corpus Study.” Pragmatics and Society(): –. 10.1075/ps.16058.gon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16058.gon [Google Scholar]
27. Haverkate, Henk
    1984 Speech Acts, Speakers, and Hearers: Reference and Referential Strategies in Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.v.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.v.4 [Google Scholar]
28. Huang, Huikang
    2023 “Milestone of China’s Foreign Relations Legislation: Historical Background, Great Significance, System Integration, Inheritance and Innovation of the Law on Foreign Relations of the People’s Republic of China (中国对外关系立法的里程碑——论中国首部《对外关系法》应运而生的时代背景、重大意义、系统集成和守正创新).” International Law Review of Wuhan University (武大国际法评论) (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hyon, Sunny
    2018 Introducing Genre and English for Specific Purposes. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Koskela, Merja
    2013 “Same, Same, But Different: Intertextual and Interdiscursive Features of Communication Strategy Texts.” Discourse & Communication(): –. 10.1177/1750481313498655
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313498655 [Google Scholar]
31. Kristeva, Julia
    1986 “Revolution in Poetic Language.” InThe Kristeva Reader, ed. byToril Moi, –. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kurzon, Dennis
    1986 It Is Hereby Performed … Explorations in Legal Speech Acts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.vii.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.vii.6 [Google Scholar]
33. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983 Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Li, Jian, Le Cheng, and Winnie Cheng
    2016 “Deontic Meaning Making in Legislative Discourse.” Semiotica: –. 10.1515/sem‑2016‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0002 [Google Scholar]
35. Maley, Yon
    1987 “The Language of Legislation”. Language in Society: –. 10.1017/S0047404500012112
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012112 [Google Scholar]
36. Maley, Yon
    1994 “The Language of the Law.” InLanguage and the Law, ed. byJohn Gibbons, –. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Marco, Marta
    2018 “Evidentials as a Mark of Genre: A Study of Four Oral and Written Genres.” Pragmatics and Society(): –. 10.1075/ps.16035.alb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16035.alb [Google Scholar]
38. Martin, James R.
    1985 “Process and Text: Two Aspects of Human Semiosis.” InSystemic Perspectives on Discourse, Volume, ed. byJames D. Benson and William S. Greaves, –. Norwood: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Massey, David
    1997 “How the American Law Institute Influences Customary Law: The Reasonableness Requirement of the Restatement of Foreign Relations Law.” Yale Journal of International Law: –.
    [Google Scholar]
40. McLachlan, Campbell
    2019 “Five Conceptions of the Functions of Foreign Relations Law.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Comparative Foreign Relations Law, ed. byCurtis Bradley, –. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190653330.013.2
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190653330.013.2 [Google Scholar]
41. Mey, Jacob
    2017 “Discourse, Interests, and the Law: Some Pragma-Legal Reflections.” International Journal of Legal Discourse(): –. 10.1515/ijld‑2017‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2017-0004 [Google Scholar]
42. Mezey, Naomi
    2001 “Law as Culture.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities: –.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Ni, Shifeng, and King Kui Sin
    2011 “A Matrix of Legislative Speech Acts for Chinese and British Statutes.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.012 [Google Scholar]
44. Nzelibe, Jide
    2020 “Can the Fourth Restatement of Foreign Relations Law Foster Legal Stability?” InThe Restatement and Beyond: The Past, Present, and Future of U.S. Foreign Relations Law, ed. byPaul Stephan, and Sarah Cleveland, –. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197533154.003.0026
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197533154.003.0026 [Google Scholar]
45. Poon, Vinton
    2017 “Is Variety as Neutral as It Seems? Re-Visiting the Concept of Linguistic Variety (and Other Basic Linguistic Terms)”. Pragmatics and Society(): –. 10.1075/ps.8.3.03poo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.3.03poo [Google Scholar]
46. Ren, Wei, Vijay K. Bhatia, and Zhengrui Han
    2020 “Analyzing Interdiscursivity in Legal Genres: The Case of Chinese Lawyers’ Written Opinions.” Pragmatics and Society(): –. 10.1075/ps.17030.han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.17030.han [Google Scholar]
47. Ross, Lauren
    2012 “Using Foreign Relations Law to Limit Extraterritorial Application of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.” Duke Law Journal: –.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Schauer, Frederick
    2023 “The Restatements as Law.” InThe American Law Institute: A Centennial History, ed. byAndrew Gold, and Robert Gordon, –. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197685341.003.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197685341.003.0020 [Google Scholar]
49. Searle, John
    1976 “The Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society: –. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
50. Shaw, Malcolm
    2021 International Law (9th Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108774802
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108774802 [Google Scholar]
51. Tardy, Christine M., and John Swales
    2014 “Genre Analysis.” InPragmatics of Discourse, ed. byKlaus Schneider, and Anne Barron, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214406‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214406-007 [Google Scholar]
52. Tiersma, Peter
    1999 Legal Language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Todorov, Tzvetan
    2000 “The Origin of Genres.” InModern Genre Theory, ed. byDavid Duff, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Trosborg, Anna
    1995 “Statutes and Contracts: An Analysis of Legal Speech Acts in the English Language of the Law.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00034‑C
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00034-C [Google Scholar]
55. Widdowson, Henry G.
    2004 Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470758427
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758427 [Google Scholar]
56. Xu, Jiajin, and Yunlong Jia
    2011 BFSU Qualitative Coder 1.1. National Research Center for Foreign Language Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University.
    [Google Scholar]