“And the right wants to hang and relax”

References

1. Antaki, C., and S. Widdicombe
   1998 Identities in Talk. London: Sage Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Antaki, C., S. Condor, and M. Levine
   1996 “Social identities in talk: speakers’ own orientations.” British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 35, no. 4: –. 10.1111/j.2044‑8309.1996.tb01109.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01109.x [Google Scholar]
3. Bergmann, J. R.
   1992 “Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry.” InTalk at Work: Interaction in institutional settings, byP. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.), –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bolden, G. B.
   2010 “‘Articulating the unsaid’ via and-prefaced formulations of others’ talk.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445609346770
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609346770 [Google Scholar]
5. Deppermann, A.
   2020 “Lean syntax: How argument structure is adapted to its interactive, material, and temporal ecology.” Linguistische Berichte: –. 10.46771/2366077500263_1
   https://doi.org/10.46771/2366077500263_1 [Google Scholar]
6. Drew, P.
   1987 “Po-faced receipts of teases.” Linguistics, vol. 25, no. 1: –. 10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219 [Google Scholar]
7. Drew, P.
   2018 “Inferences and Indirectness in Interaction.” Open Linguistics, vol. 4, no. 1: –. 10.1515/opli‑2018‑0013
   https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0013 [Google Scholar]
8. Drew, P., and A. Hepburn
   2016 “Absent Apologies.” Discourse Processes: –. 10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056690
   https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056690 [Google Scholar]
9. Drew, P., and E. Holt
   1998 “Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation.” Language in Society: –. 10.1017/S0047404500020200
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500020200 [Google Scholar]
10. Drew, P., T. Walker, and R. Ogden
    2013 “Self-repair and action construction.” InConversational Repair and Human Understanding, byJack Sidnell, Makoto Hayashi and Geoffrey Raymond (eds.), –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Evans, B., and R. Fitzgerald
    2016 “‘It’s Training Man’! Membership Categorization and the Institutional Moral Order of Basketball Training.” Australian Journal of Linguistics, vol. 36, no. 2: –. 10.1080/07268602.2015.1121531
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2015.1121531 [Google Scholar]
12. Evans, B., and R. Fitzgerald
    2017 “‘You Gotta See Both at the Same Time’: Visually Analyzing Player Performances in Basketball Coaching.” Human Studies, vol. 40: –. 10.1007/s10746‑016‑9415‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-016-9415-3 [Google Scholar]
13. Fitzgerald, R., and W. Housley
    2015 Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. London: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781473917873
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473917873 [Google Scholar]
14. Garfinkel, H.
    1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Goodwin, C., and M. H. Goodwin
    1987 “Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments.” IPRA Papers in Pragmatics, vol. 1, no. 1: –.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Grice, H. P.
    1975 “Syntax and semantics.” InLogic and Conversation, byP. Cole and J. L. Morgan, –. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gutierrez, J. P. D. L., T. R. Silva, Y. Dittrich, and A. S. Sørensen
    2024 “Design Goals for End-User Development of Robot-Assisted Physical Training Activities: A Participatory Design Study.” Computer Interaction.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Heritage, J.
    1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hernandez, E., K. Carmichael, S. Kiliç, and J. C. Dunsmore
    2019 “Linguistic indirectness in parent-preschooler reminiscing about emotion-related events: Links with emotion regulation and psychosocial adjustment.” Social Development: –. 10.1111/sode.12345
    https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12345 [Google Scholar]
20. Housley, W., and R. Fitzgerald
    2002 “The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis.” Qualitative Research, vol. 2, no. 1: –. 10.1177/146879410200200104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200104 [Google Scholar]
21. Jefferson, G.
    2004 Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InG. H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
22. Lindholm, C.
    2024 “Positive assessments, monitoring of activities, and dementia.” Discourse Studies: –.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Livnat, Z., P. Shukrun-Nagar, and G. Hirsch
    2020 The Discourse of Indirectness: Cues, Voices and Functions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.316
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.316 [Google Scholar]
24. Maynard, D. W.
    1997 “The News Delivery Sequence: Bad News and Good News in Conversational Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 30, no. 2: –. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3002_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3002_1 [Google Scholar]
25. Maynard, D. W.
    2003 Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mondada, L.
    2013 “Interactional space and the study of embodied talk-in-interaction.” InSpace in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional and Cognitive Perspectives, byPeter Auer, Martin Hilpert, Anja Stukenbrock and Bernd Szmrecsanyi (eds.), –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110312027.247
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110312027.247 [Google Scholar]
27. Mondada, L.
    2018 Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
28. Nicolaisen, E. M.
    2025 Seeing or Feeling? Evaluations and Their Social Organization in Tests of Robot-Assisted Walking for Young Adults With Mobility Impairments. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, vol., no.. 10.3138/jircd‑2024‑0019
    https://doi.org/10.3138/jircd-2024-0019 [Google Scholar]
29. Pedersen, M. B., C. E. Fronvig, P. Aagaard, G. M. Hasen, K. J. Jørgensen, and A. Holsgaard-Larsen
    2021 “Body-weight-supported gait training for mobility and quality of life in adults with acquired and congenital, non-progressive brain injuries: a systematic review.” PROSPERO.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pomerantz, A.
    1984a “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” InStructures of Social Action, byJ. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pomerantz, A.
    1984b “Pursuing a response.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, byJ. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Pomerantz, A.
    2017 “Inferring the purpose of a prior query and responding accordingly.” InEnabling Human Conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff, byGeoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner and John Heritage (eds.), –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/pbns.273.04pom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.273.04pom [Google Scholar]
33. Rafaely, D.
    2024 “Self-categorization: a resource for the management of experiential entitlement in talk about child death.” Text&Talk, vol. 44, no. 2: –. 10.1515/text‑2021‑0112
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2021-0112 [Google Scholar]
34. Rasmussen, G.
    2010 “‘Going mental’: The risks of assessment activities (in teenage talk).” Discourse Studies, vol. 12, no. 6: –. 10.1177/1461445610381863
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610381863 [Google Scholar]
35. Rasmussen, G.
    2012 “Triumphing: When ‘mental state’ evaluations become insults.” InEvaluating Cognitive Competences in Interaction, byGitte Rasmussen, Catherine E. Brouwer and Dennis Day (eds.), –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.225.10ras
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.225.10ras [Google Scholar]
36. Sacks, H.
    1972a “An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology.” InStudies in Social Interaction, byDavid Sudnow (ed.), –. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sacks, H.
    1972b “On the analyzability of stories by children.” InDirections in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, byJohn J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes (eds.), –. New York: Rinehart & Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Sacks, H.
    1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sacks, H. E. A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language, vol. 50, no. 4: –.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schegloff, E. A.
    1982 “Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences.” InAnalyzing discourse: Text and talk, byD. Tannen (ed.), –. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Schegloff, E. A.
    1984 “On some questions and ambiguities in conversation.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, byJ. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Schegloff, E. A.
    1988 “On an actual virtual servo-mechanism for guessing bad news: single case conjecture.” Social Problems, vol. 35, no. 4: –. 10.2307/800596
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800596 [Google Scholar]
43. Schegloff, E. A.
    1996 “Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action.” American Journal of Sociology, (): –. 10.1086/230911
    https://doi.org/10.1086/230911 [Google Scholar]
44. Schegloff, E. A.
    2007a “A tutorial on membership categorization.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 39, no. 3: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007 [Google Scholar]
45. Schegloff, E. A.
    2007b Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
46. Searle, J. R.
    1976 “A classification of illocutionary acts.” Language in Society, vol. 5: –. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
47. Sørensen, A. S., and G. Rasmussen
    2018 “RoBody Interaction — A new approach at Kinesthetic Human Robot Interaction.” Proceedings of the 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. 10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525844
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525844 [Google Scholar]
48. Tracy, K., and J. S. Robles
    2013 Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. New York: The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Visapää, L.
    2021 “Self-description in everyday interaction: Generalizations about oneself as accounts of behavior.” Discourse Studies, vol. 23, no. 3: –. 10.1177/14614456211009044
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456211009044 [Google Scholar]
50. Weiste, E., A. Peräkylä, T. Valkeapää, E. Savander, and J. Hintikka
    2018 “Institutionalised otherness: Patients references to psychiatric diagnostic categories.” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 207: –. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.048
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.048 [Google Scholar]
51. Wong, J.
    2000 “The Token “Yeah” in Nonnative Speaker English Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 33, no. 1: –. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3301_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3301_2 [Google Scholar]