1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics and Society
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Failed execution in inferential pragmatics
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study proposes a redefinition of the pragmatic foundations of linguistic communication, based on the notion of as an autonomous analytical category. Drawing on qualitative analysis of a curated illustrative set of context-light digital utterances marked by syntactic incompleteness, referential opacity, and intentional suspension, the study demonstrates that communicative success need not hinge on classical felicity conditions or on strict adherence to conversational maxims. Instead, it is stabilized through inferential uptake and implicature derivation within relevance-guided interpretation. Through utterance types such as ‘This changes everything,’ the paper argues that failed execution is a recurrent and productive module of natural discourse. The research thus positions itself at the intersection of formal pragmatics, cognitive linguistics, and discourse analysis, proposing an extension of implicature theory and a departure from traditional locutionary models, through an inferential theory grounded in and interpretive convergence. The paper concludes by offering a theoretical systematization of as a regulative principle of contemporary communication, and by outlining new avenues of inquiry into opaque and underdetermined linguistic practices.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.25114.mer
2026-05-19
2026-06-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ps.25114.mer
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Attardo, Salvatore
    2002 Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. InLuigi Anolli, Rita Ciceri & Giuseppe Riva (eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication, –. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin, John L.
    1962 How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Carston, Robyn
    2002 Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470754603
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chierchia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet
    2000 Meaning and grammar: An introduction to semantics, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Du Bois, John W.
    2007 The stance triangle. InRobert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  6. Edmondson, Willis & Juliane House
    2023 Speech acts and interaction in second language pragmatics: A position paper. Language Teaching(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1971 Santa Cruz lectures on deixis. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Gal, Noa
    2019 Ironic humor on Facebook as participatory boundary work. New Media & Society(). –. 10.1177/1461444818805719
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818805719 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gärtner, Hans-Martin & Andreas Pankau
    2024 Recent advances in the syntax of speech acts. Lingua. .
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Giora, Rachel
    1997 Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goodwin, Charles
    2000 Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics(). –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00096‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X [Google Scholar]
  12. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, –. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  13. Herring, Susan C.
    2013 Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. InDeborah Tannen & Anna Marie Trester (eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media, –. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Hu, Jena, Roger Levy, Judith Degen & Stefan Schuster
    2023 Expectations over unspoken alternatives predict pragmatic inferences. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2304.04758. 10.1162/tacl_a_00579
     https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00579 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jakobson, Roman
    1960 Closing statements: Linguistics and poetics. InThomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, –. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Jucker, Andreas H., Sara W. Smith & Tanja Lüdge
    2003 Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics(). –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00188‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00188-1 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kaplan, David
    1989 Demonstratives. InJoseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Kennedy, Christopher
    2007 Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy(). –. 10.1007/s10988‑006‑9008‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kiparsky, Carol & Paul Kiparsky
    1970 Fact. InManfred Bierwisch & Karl Erich Heidolph (eds.), Progress in linguistics, –. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783111350219.143
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111350219.143 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kiss, É. Katalin
    1998 Identificational focus versus information focus. Language(). –. 10.2307/417867
     https://doi.org/10.2307/417867 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
    2009 La linguistica pragmatica. Roma: Carocci.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Lyons, John
    1977 Semantics, vols.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Malinowski, Bronisław
    1923 The problem of meaning in primitive languages. InC. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (eds.), The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, –. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Metsä-Ketelä, Maria
    2012 Direct quotes as part of the grammar of conversation: A sociolinguistic study. Discourse Studies(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Ochs, Elinor
    1990 Indexicality and socialization. InJames W. Stigler, Richard A. Shweder & Gilbert Herdt (eds.), Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173728.009
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173728.009 [Google Scholar]
  26. Padilla Cruz, Manuel & Agnieszka Piskorska
    (eds.) 2022 New developments in relevance theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pc.28.2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.28.2 [Google Scholar]
  27. Portner, Paul
    2005 What is meaning? Fundamentals of formal semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Potts, Christopher
    2007 The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/TL.2007.011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
  29. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. InLiliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, –. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  30. Sbisà, Marina
    2024 Essays on speech acts and other topics in pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Simons, Mandy
    2007 Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition. Lingua(). –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1986 Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Stainton, Robert J.
    2006 Words and thoughts: Subsentences, ellipsis, and the philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250387.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250387.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Trotzke, Andreas
    2022 Empirical approaches to elliptical constructions. Theoretical Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. von Fintel, Kai
    2004 Would you believe it? The King of France is back! Presuppositions and truthvalue intuitions. InMarga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and beyond, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199270514.003.009
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199270514.003.009 [Google Scholar]
  36. Weigand, Edda
    1999 Misunderstanding: The standard case. Journal of Pragmatics(). –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00068‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00068-X [Google Scholar]
  37. Wharton, Tim
    2022 Relevance theory: New horizons. Lingua. .
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Wilson, Deirdre
    2024 Relevance theory and context. InYan Huang (ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Yuan, William & Robin Cooper
    2017 Relevance theory, pragmatic inference and cognitive architecture. Philosophical Psychology(). –. 10.1080/09515089.2018.1497788
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2018.1497788 [Google Scholar]
  40. Yus, Francisco
    2011 Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.213
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.25114.mer
Loading
Failed execution in inferential pragmatics
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.25114.mer
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.25114.mer
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.25114.mer
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: felicity conditions ; implicature ; inferential pragmatics ; failed execution ; digital language ; suspended deixis

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error