1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

While compliments are usually intended to give credit and insults offense, the latter cannot simply be treated as opposites of the former. For example, a speaker can give credit to others as well as himself/herself. But while a speaker can offend others, it is less clear that a speaker can offend himself/herself. Understanding why this should be so provides us with a key insight into the nature of insults, namely, that it is predicated on the presumption that some dissimilarity exists between the speaker and the target of the insult. Various interesting implications follow from this insight, allowing us to (i) understand why competitive ritualized exchanges of insults are more commonly attested than are analogous competitions involving compliments; (ii) better appreciate the ideological bases of politically correct speech; and (iii) adjudicate on the relative merits of various theories of politeness, in particular, on claims concerning the relationship between politeness and face.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.6.1.01wee
2015-01-01
2019-09-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.6.1.01wee
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): compliments , face , impoliteness , insults , political correctness and sounding
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error