The pragmatics of professional discourse
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This article starts from the observation of current changes in the nature of a globalizing public sphere for which older structural boundaries have lost much of their relevance. Though the public sphere has traditionally been a topic for social scientists (and philosophers), a redefinition in terms of the realm of publicly accessible meaning, and of struggles over socially and politically important meaning, necessitates a contribution from the humanities. In particular, linguistic pragmatics, providing tools for an analysis of the way in which explicit and implicit forms of meaning interact in the process of generating meanings, is argued to be a useful instrument. The argument is supported with an analysis of the differences in meaning landscapes that emerge even in different-­language versions of the ‘same’ text, illustrating how dependent publicly available meaning is on basic pragmatic processes. The article concludes that a maturing science of language use is therefore needed to understand variations in the accounts of social and political reality that people in a globalizing public sphere live by.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Auer, Peter , and Jürgen Erich Schmidt
    (eds) 2010Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker, Hannah , and Simon Burrows
    2002Press, Politics and the Public Sphere in Europe and North America, 1760–1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bastardas-Boada, Albert
    2012Sociolinguistics: Towards a Complex Ecological View. Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bateson, Gregory
    1972Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. New York: Ballantine Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 1979Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: E.P. Dutton.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauman, Zygmunt
    2000Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergen, Benjamin K
    2012Louder than Words: The New Science of how the Mind Makes Meaning. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bookchin, Murray
    1980Toward and Ecological Society. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Calvet, Louis-Jean
    2006Towards an Ecology of World Languages. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chilton, Paul
    2004Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dahlgren, Peter
    1995Television and the Public Sphere: Citizenship, Democracy and the Media. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Doran, Ryan , Gregory Ward , Meredith Larson , Yaron McNabb , and Rachel Baker
    2012 “A Novel Experimental Paradigm for Distinguishing between What is Said and What is Implicated.” Language88 (1): 124–154. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0008 [Google Scholar]
  13. Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah
    2002Multiple Modernities. Piscataway, N.J.: Transaction.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2003Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Enfield, Nick
    2010Human Sociality at the Heart of Language. Nijmegen: Radboud University.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Enninger, Werner , and Lilith M. Haynes
    (eds) 1984Studies in Language Ecology. (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beihefte, Heft 45). Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. European Convention
    2003 [Texts of the Draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe]. european-convention.eu.int/EN/DraftTreaty/DraftTreaty2352.html?lang=EN (October2013).
  18. Finke, Peter
    2005Die Ökologie des Wissens. Freiburg: Alber.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ghervas, Stella
    2004 “A propos des traductions du projet de Constitution européenne.” Geneva, unpublished ms.
  20. 2012 “Les valeurs de l’Europe: entre l’idéal, le discours et la réalité.” InRethinking Democracy, Kiev. rethinkingdemocracy.org.ua/themes/Ghervas_fr.html
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Giorgi, Liana , Ingmar von Homeyer , and Wayne Parsons
    (eds) 2006Democracy in the European Union: Towards the Emergence of a Public Sphere. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gripsrud, Jostein , and Hallvard Moe
    (eds) 2010The Digital Public Sphere: Challenges for Media Policy. Göteborg: Nordicom.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gripsrud, Jostein , Hallvard Moe , Anders Molander , and Graham Murdock
    (eds) 2011The Public Sphere (vols. 1–4). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Habermas, Jürgen
    1979Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1983 “Modernity – An Incomplete Project”. InPostmodern Culture, ed. by Hal Foster , 3–15. Port Townsend, Wash.: Bay Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1984The Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1989The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. [Original German version, 1962, Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit.]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Haugen, Einar
    1972The Ecology of Language. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hawley, Amos H
    1950Human Ecology: A Theory of Community Structure. New York: The Ronald Press Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Koopmans, Ruud , and Paul Statham
    (eds) 2010The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511761010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761010 [Google Scholar]
  31. Levinson, Stephen C
    2000Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McNair, Brian
    2000Journalism and Democracy: An Evaluation of the Political Public Sphere. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mufwene, Salikoko S
    2001The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511612862
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612862 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mühlhäusler, Peter
    1996Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Rim. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203211281
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203211281 [Google Scholar]
  35. Östman, Jan-Ola
    1986Pragmatics as Implicitness: An Analysis of Question Particles in Solf Swedish, with Implications for the study of Passive Clauses and the Language of Persuasion. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Price, Monroe E
    1995Television, the Public Sphere, and National Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schneider, Klaus P. , and Anne Barron
    (eds) 2008Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.178
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.178 [Google Scholar]
  38. Scollon, Ron
    2008Analyzing Public Discourse: Discourse Analysis in the Making of Public Policy. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Steward, Julian H
    1972Theory of Culture Change: The Methodology of Multilinear Evolution. Champaign, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Thompson, John B
    1990Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 1995The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Triandafyllidou, Anna , Ruth Wodak , and Michał Krzyżanowski
    (eds) 2009The European Public Sphere and the Media: Europe in Crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230271722
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230271722 [Google Scholar]
  43. Verschueren, Jef
    1999Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold/New York: Oxford University Press. (Now freely downloadable athttps://www.uantwerpen.be/en/rg/ipra/research/publications/books/)
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2001 “Predicaments of Criticism.” Critique of Anthropology21 (1): 59–81. doi: 10.1177/0308275X0102100104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X0102100104 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2008 “Context and Structure in a Theory of Pragmatics.” Studies in Pragmatics10: 14–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2012Ideology in Language Use: Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2013 “Markers of Implicit Meaning: A Pragmatic Paradox?” Foreign Language Education and Research1 (1): 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Verschueren, Jef , and Frank Brisard
    2002 “Adaptability.” InHandbook of Pragmatics(8th annual installment), ed. by Jan-Ola Östman , and Jef Verschueren . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hop.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.6 [Google Scholar]
  49. Vygotsky, Lev S
    1978Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wagner, Peter
    2012Modernity: Understanding the Present. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Winch, Peter
    1958The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wodak, Ruth , and Veronika Koller
    (eds) 2008Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110198980
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198980 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wodak, Ruth , and Michael Meyer
    (eds) 2009Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): globalization; humanities; ideology; implicit meaning; public sphere; social sciences
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error