The role of metapragmatic expressions as pragmatic manipulation in a TV panel discussion program

References

1. Caffi, Claudia
   1984 “Introduction”. Journal of Pragmatics8: 433–435. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(84)90035‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90035-3 [Google Scholar]
2. Caffi, Claudia
   1993 “Metapragmatics”. InEncyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2461–2466. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Caffi, Claudia
   2006 “Metapragmatics”. InEncyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edition, 82–88. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00317‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00317-5 [Google Scholar]
4. Caffi, Claudia
   2007 Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carston, Robyn
   2002 Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470754603
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603 [Google Scholar]
6. Ciliberti, Anna , and Laurie Anderson
   2007 “Metapragmatic Comments in Institutional Talk: A Comparative Analysis Across Settings.” InMetapragmatics in Use, ed. by Wolfram 
Bublitz and Axel Hübler , 143–166. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.165.11cil
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.165.11cil [Google Scholar]
7. de Saussure, Louis , and Peter Schulz
   (eds) 2005 Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, language, mind. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.17
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.17 [Google Scholar]
8. de Saussure, Louis
   2005 “Manipulation and Cognitive Pragmatics: Preliminary Hypotheses.” InManipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind, ed. by Louis de Saussure and Peter Schulz , 113–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.17.07sau
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.17.07sau [Google Scholar]
9. Goffman, Erving
   1963 Behavior in Public: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: The Free Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hübler, Axel
    2011 “Metapragmatics.” InFoundations of Pragmatics, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz and Neal R. Norrick , 107–136. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214260.107
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214260.107 [Google Scholar]
11. Hübler, Axel , and Wolfram Bublitz
    2007 “Introducing Metapragmatics in Use.” InMetapragmatics in Use, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz and Axel Hübler , 1–26. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.165.02hub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.165.02hub [Google Scholar]
12. Hyland, Ken
    2005/2008 Metadiscourse. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kleinke, Sonja , and Birte, Bös
    2015 “Intergroup Rudeness and the Metapragmatics of its Negotiation in Online Discussion Fora”. Pragmatics25(1): 47–71. doi: 10.1075/prag.25.1.03kle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25.1.03kle [Google Scholar]
14. Levinson, Stephen C
    1988 Generalized Conversational Implicatures and the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Levinson, Stephen C
    2000 Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Mey, Jacob L
    1993/2001 Pragmatics: An Introduction, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Penz, Hermine
    2007 “Building Common Ground through Metapragmatic Comments in International Project Work.” InMetapragmatics in Use, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz and Axel Hübler , 263–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.165.17pen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.165.17pen [Google Scholar]
18. Ran, Yongping
    2013 “The Metapragmatic Negation as a Rapport-Oriented Mitigating Device”. Journal of Pragmatics48: 98–111. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.012 [Google Scholar]
19. Rigotti, Eddo
    2005 “Towards a Typology of Manipulative Processes.” InManipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, language, mind, ed. by Louis de Saussure and Peter Schulz . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.17.05rig
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.17.05rig [Google Scholar]
20. Silverstein, Michael
    1993 “Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function.” InReflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by John A. Lucy , 33–58. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004 [Google Scholar]
21. Smith, Sara W. , and Xiaoping Liang
    2007 “Metapragmatic Expressions in Physics Lectures.” InMetapragmatics in Use, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz and Axel Hübler , 167–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.165.12smi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.165.12smi [Google Scholar]
22. Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa
    2007 “Metapragmatic Utterances in Computer-Mediated Interaction.” InMetapragmatics in Use, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz and Axel Hübler , 87–106. Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.165.07tan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.165.07tan [Google Scholar]
23. Van Dijk, Teun A
    2006 “Discourse and Manipulation”. Discourse and Society17(2): 359–383. doi: 10.1177/0957926506060250
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250 [Google Scholar]
24. Verschueren, Jef
    1999/2000 Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Verschueren, Jef
    2000 “Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use”. Pragmatics10(4): 439–456. doi: 10.1075/prag.10.4.02ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.10.4.02ver [Google Scholar]