When questioners count on recipients’ lack of knowledge

References

1. Auer, Peter
   2002 “Projection in Conversation and Projection in Grammar.” InLiSt33, www.inlist.uni-bayreuth.de/issues/33/Inlist33.pdf.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bruner, Jerome
   1983 Child’s Talk: Learning to Use Language. New York: Norton.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Clayman, Steven E
   1993 “Reformulating the Question: A Device for Answering/Not Answering Questions in News Interviews and Press Conferences.” Text13: 159–188.
   [Google Scholar]
4. De Stefani, Elwys
   2010 “Reference as an Interactively and Multimodally Accomplished Practice: Organizing Spatial Reorientation in Guided Tours.” InSpoken Communication, ed. by Massimo Pettorino , Antonella Giannini , Isabella Chiari , and Francesca Dovetto , 137–170. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
5. De Stefani, Elwys , and Lorenza Mondada
   2007 “L’organizzazione multimodale e interazionale dell’orientamento spaziale in movimento.” Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée85: 131–159.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gardner, Rod
   2004 “On Delaying the Answer: Question Sequences Extended after the Question.” InSecond Language Conversations, ed. by Rod Gardner and Johannes Wagner , 246–267. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Glenn, Phillip , and Elizabeth Holt
   2014 “Introduction.” InStudies of Laughter in Interaction, ed. by Phillip Glenn and Elizabeth Holt , 1–22. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Goffman, Erving
   1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Haakana, Markku
   2001 “Laughter as a Patient’s Resource: Dealing with Delicate Aspects of Medical Interaction.” Text21: 187–219.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Heritage, John
    2002 “The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content.” Journal of Pragmatics34: 1427–1446. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00072‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3 [Google Scholar]
11. Heritage, John , and David Greatbatch
    1991 “On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interview Interaction.” InTalk and Social Structure, ed. by Deirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman , 93–137. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke
    1995 “Meeting Both Ends: Between Standardization and Recipient Design in Telephone Survey Interviews.” InSituated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities, ed. by Paul ten Have and George Psathas , 91–106. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, and University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Koshik, Irene
    2005 Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.16
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.16 [Google Scholar]
14. Mehan, Hugh
    1979 Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674420106
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674420106 [Google Scholar]
15. Mondada, Lorenza
    2005 “La constitution de l’origo déictique comme travail interactionnel des participants: une approche praxéologique de la spatialité.” Intellectica41–42 : 75–100.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Peräkylä, Anssi
    2007 “Conversation Analysis. ” InBlackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, ed. by George Ritzer , 791–794. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.”Language50: 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
18. Schegloff, Emanuel
    2007 Sequence Organization. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
19. Seedhouse, Paul
    2004 The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Sidnell, Jack , and Tanya Stivers
    (eds) 2012 Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118325001
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001 [Google Scholar]
21. Streeck, Jürgen
    1995 “On Projection.” InInteraction and Social Intelligence, ed. by Esther Goody , 84–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Traverso, Véronique
    2008 “Cadres, espaces, objets et multimodalité dans l’interaction en site commercial.” InLes interactions en site commercial: Invariants et variations, ed. by Cathérine Kerbrat-Orecchioni and Véronique Traverso , 45–77. Lyon: ENS Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Traverso, Véronique
    2012 “’Le salon bibliothèque’: délimitation et partage des espaces. Usage des annonces dénominatives désignatives dans la visite guidée.” InLes visites guidées. Discours, interaction, multimodalité, ed. by Jean-Paul Dufiet , 56–84. Trento: Collezione Labirinti.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Traverso, Véronique
    2014a “Compétences montrées, compétences partagées, compétences situées: nomination et définition des objets dans les visites guidées.” InDe compétences en performances, ed. by Sandra Bornand and Cécile Leguy , 137–163. Paris: Karthala.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Traverso, Véronique
    2014b “La construction de (l’attention visuelle sur) l’objet au cours de la visite guidée: étude d’un cas limite.” InL’objet d’art et de culture à la lumière de ses médiations, ed. by Jean-Paul Dufiet , 43–85. Trento: Collezione Labirinti.
    [Google Scholar]
26. vom Lehn, Dirk , Christian Heath , and Jon Hindmarsh
    2001 “Exhibiting Interaction: Conduct and Collaboration in Museums and Galleries.” Symbolic Interaction24 (2): 189–216. doi: 10.1525/si.2001.24.2.189
    https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2001.24.2.189 [Google Scholar]