1887
(Co-)Constructing Interpersonally Sensitive Activities Across Institutional Settings
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

I investigate patterns of usage of thanking formulae in the closing section of a corpus of 94 telephone calls made by tenants to a UK housing association. The data suggest that unilateral thanking is the norm when calls are institutionally and interactionally unmarked. In contrast, mutual thanking correlates mainly with the presence of interactional problems of various kinds, or, in a few cases, with features that are not problematic as such, but simply interactionally marked given the nature of the activity. When initiated by agents rather than by callers, thanking is frequently hearable as conveying an apologetic stance. Participants thus seem to orient to different thanking patterns as devices which may be used either to mark the preceding interaction as an instance of ‘business-as-usual’ or, if such is not the case, to restore interpersonal harmony or index awareness that aspects of the preceding interaction have otherwise deviated from situational expectations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.7.4.07mos
2016-12-05
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aijmer, Karin
    1996Conversational Routines in English. Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Antaki, Charles
    2002 “‘Lovely’: Turn-initial High-grade Assessments in Telephone Closings.” Discourse Studies4 (1): 5–23. doi: 10.1177/14614456020040010101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040010101 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aston, Guy
    1995 “‘Say ‘”Thank You”’: Some Pragmatic Constraints on Conversational Closings.” Applied Linguistics16 (1): 57–86. doi: 10.1093/applin/16.1.57
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.1.57 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Penelope , and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness. Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Button, Graham
    1987 “Moving out of Closings.” InTalk and Social Organisation, ed. by Gene Button and John R.E. Lee , 101–151. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, Herbert H. , and J. Wade French
    1981 “Telephone Goodbyes.” Language in Society10: 1–19. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500008393
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500008393 [Google Scholar]
  7. Coulmas, Florian
    1981 “‘Poison to Your Soul’. Thanks and Apologies Contrastively Viewed.” InConversational Routine. Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas , 69–91. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Emerson, Robert M. , and Sheldon L. Messinger
    1977 “The Micro-politics of Trouble.” Social Problems25 (2): 121–134. doi: 10.2307/800289
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800289 [Google Scholar]
  9. Erman, Britt , and Ulla-Britt Kotsinas
    1993 “Pragmaticalization: The case of ba’ and you know .” Studier i modern språkvetenskap10: 76–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goffman, Erving
    1967 “On Face-Work. An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” InInteraction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior, 5–45. Chicago: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Heritage, John
    1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heritage, John , and Steven Clayman
    2010Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heritage, John , and Sue Sefi
    1992 “Dilemmas of Advice: Aspects of the Delivery and Reception of Advice in Interactions between Health Visitors and First-Time Mothers.” InTalk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage , 359–417. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hymes, Dell
    1971 “Sociolinguistics and the Ethnography of Speaking.” InSocial Anthropology and Language, ed. by Edwin Ardener , 47–93. London: Tavistock.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jautz, Sabine
    2013Thanking Formulae in English. Explorations Across Varieties and Genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.230
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.230 [Google Scholar]
  16. Karttunen, Lauri
    1971 “Implicative Verbs.” Language47 (2): 340–358. doi: 10.2307/412084
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412084 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lerner, Gene, H
    2004 “Collaborative Turn Sequences.” InConversation Analysis. Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner , 225–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.12ler
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.12ler [Google Scholar]
  18. Levinson, Stephen C
    1979 “Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics17: 365–399. doi: 10.1515/ling.1979.17.5‑6.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1979.17.5-6.365 [Google Scholar]
  19. 1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lindström, Anna , and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
    2013 “Affiliation in Conversation.” InHandbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers , 350–369. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Murphy, James
    2015 “Revisiting the Apology as a Speech Act. The Case of Parliamentary Apologies.” Journal of Language and Politics14 (2): 175–204. doi: 10.1075/jlp.14.2.01mur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.2.01mur [Google Scholar]
  22. Okamoto, Shinichiro , and W. Peter Robinson
    1997 “Determinants of Gratitude Expressions in England.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology16 (4): 411–433. doi: 10.1177/0261927X970164003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970164003 [Google Scholar]
  23. Sacks, Harvey
    1995Lectures on Conversation, vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444328301
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301 [Google Scholar]
  24. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  25. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  26. Schegloff, Emanuel A. , and Harvey Sacks
    1974 “Opening up Closings.” InEthnomethodology: Selected Readings, ed. by Roy Turner , 233–263. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sidnell, Jack
    2010Conversation Analysis. An Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Woods, Catherine J. , Paul Drew , and Geraldine M. Leydon
    2015 “Closing Calls to a Cancer Helpline: Expressions of Caller Satisfaction.” Patient Education and Counseling98 (8): 943–953. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.015 [Google Scholar]
  29. Yngve, Victor
    1970 “On getting a word in edgewise.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society6: 567–578.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.7.4.07mos
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conversation , institutional discourse , interpersonal relations , service calls and thanking
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error