Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This paper reports on conversation analytic research for the Dutch national emergency call-centre. In a corpus study of 120 emergency calls we show that callers’ orientations to their communicative tasks are not aligned to the institutional communicative tasks of the call-takers. In a subsequent workplace experiment involving over 2000 calls, it appeared that the use of an alternative question rather than a wh-question, significantly altered callers’ emergency deliveries and adapted them to call-takers’ communicative needs. The analysis shows two aspects of callers’ responses to the different question formats: (i) The alternative questions produced significantly more type-conforming answers than the wh-questions, and also (ii) callers treated their non-conforming answer to alternative question more often as dispreferred than their non-conforming answers to wh-questions. Callers thus treated the preference for type-conformity to be stronger for alternative questions than for wh-questions.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Antaki, Charles
    (ed.) 2011Applied Conversation Analysis. Intervention and change in institutional talk. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230316874
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230316874 [Google Scholar]
  2. Clayman, Steven & John Heritage
    2002The News Interview. Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cromdal, Jakob , Karin Osvaldsson & Daniel Persson-Thunqvist
    2008 Context that matters: Producing “thick-enough descriptions” in initial emergency reports. Journal of Pragmatics40 (2008) 927–959. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.006 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cromdal, Jakob , Hakan Landqvist , Daniel Persson-Thunqvist & Karin Osvaldsson
    2012 Finding out what’s happened: Two procedures for opening emergency calls. Discourse Studies14(4) 371–397. doi: 10.1177/1461445612439960
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612439960 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dovigo, Fabio & Ilaria Redaelli
    2010 Knowledge Management in Locating the Patient in an Emergency Medical Service in Italy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work19, 457–481. doi: 10.1007/s10606‑010‑9118‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9118-7 [Google Scholar]
  6. Drew, Paul
    2005 Conversation analysis. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 71–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Englert, Christina
    2010 Questions and responses in Dutch conversations. Journal of Pragmatics42, 2666–2684. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  8. Fele, Giolo
    2008 The Collaborative Production of Responses and Dispatching on the Radio: Video Analysis in a Medical Emergency Call Center. Forum: Qualitative social research, 9(3), Art. 40.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gaskell, George D. , Colm A. O’Muircheataigh , and Daniel B. Wright
    1994 Survey questions about the frequency of vaguely defined events: The effects of response alternatives. Public Opinion Quarterly58 (2), 241–254. doi: 10.1086/269420
    https://doi.org/10.1086/269420 [Google Scholar]
  10. Heritage, John
    2008 Conversation Analysis as Social Theory. In Bryan Turner (ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 300–320.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2009 Negotiating the Legitimacy of Medical Problems A Multiphase Concern for Patients and Physicians. in: Dale Brashers and Deana Goldsmith (eds.), Communicating to Manage Health and Illness. New York: Routledge, 147–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heritage, John & Jeffrey D. Robinson
    2006 The Structure of Patients’ Presenting Concerns: Physicians’ Opening Questions. Health Communication19(2), 89–102. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1902_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1902_1 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2011 ‘Some’ vs ‘Any’ Medical Issues: Encouraging Patients to Reveal Their Unmet Concerns. In Charles Antaki (ed.), Applied Conversation Analysis: Changing Institutional Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 15–31. doi: 10.1057/9780230316874_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230316874_2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Huiskes, Mike
    2010The role of the clause for turn-taking in Dutch conversation. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke & Charles Antaki
    1997 Creating Happy People by Asking Yes-No Questions. Research On Language and Social Interaction30, 4, 285–315. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3004_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3004_2 [Google Scholar]
  16. Imbens-Bailey, Alison & Allyssa McCabe
    2000 The discourse of distress: a narrative analysis of emergency calls to 911. Language & Communication20, 275–296. doi: 10.1016/S0271‑5309(99)00025‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00025-7 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis. Studies from the first generation. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 13–31. doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  18. Kitzinger, Celia
    2011 Working with Childbirth Helplines: The Contributions and Limitations of Conversation Analysis. In Charles Antaki (ed.), Applied Conversation Analysis. Intervention and change in institutional talk. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 98–118. doi: 10.1057/9780230316874.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230316874.0011 [Google Scholar]
  19. Koole, Tom
    2010 Displays of epistemic access. Student responses to teacher explanations. Research on Language and Social Interaction43, 2, 183–209. doi: 10.1080/08351811003737846
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351811003737846 [Google Scholar]
  20. Koole, Tom , Nina Verberg & Claudia de Widt
    2013 Omgaan met de onervaren beller: de opening van 112-gesprekken [Dealing with the inexperienced caller: the opening of emergency calls], Ronny Boogaart & Henrike Jansen (red.). Studies in Taalbeheersing4. Assen: Van Gorcum, 223–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Koole, Tom & Pim Mak
    2014 Using conversation analysis to improve an augmented communication tool. Research on Language and Social Interaction47(3), 280–291. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2014.925665
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.925665 [Google Scholar]
  22. Larsen, Tine
    2013 Dispatching Emergency Assistance: Callers’ Claims of Entitlement and Call Takers’ Decisions. Research on Language and Social Interaction46(3), 205–230. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2013.810401
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.810401 [Google Scholar]
  23. Margutti, Piera
    2006 Are you human beings? Order and knowledge construction through questioning in primary classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education17, 313–346. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2006.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Paoletti, Isabella
    2012 The issue of conversationally constituted context and localization problems in emergency calls. Text & Talk32(2), 191–210.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Peräkylä, Anssi & Sanna Vehviläinen
    2003 Conversation Analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge, Discourse & Society14 (6), 727–750. doi: 10.1177/09579265030146003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030146003 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pomerantz, Anita
    1978 Compliment responses: notes on the cooperation of multiple constraints. In J. N. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press, 79–112. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50010‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50010-0 [Google Scholar]
  27. 1984 Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some featrues of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pomerantz, Anita B. J. Fehr
    1997 Conversation Analysis: An Approach to the Study of Social Action as Sense Making Practices. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 64–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Pomerantz, Anita & John Heritage
    2013 Preference. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers . 2013. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 210–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Raymond, Geoffrey
    2003 Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding. American Sociological Review68, 6, 939–967. doi: 10.2307/1519752
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752 [Google Scholar]
  31. Raymond, Geoffrey & Don H. Zimmerman
    2007 Rights and responsibilities in calls for help: The case of the Mountain Glade Fire. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40, (1): 33–61. doi: 10.1080/08351810701331232
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701331232 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sacks, Harvey
    1987 On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 54–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 1992Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
    1974 A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation, Language50, 4, 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sacks, Harvey & Emanuel A. Schegloff
    1979 Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons and Their Interaction. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, 15–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1968 Sequencing in Conversational Openings. American Anthropologist70, 1075–1095. doi: 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  37. 1972 Notes on a Conversation Practice: Formulating Place. In David Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction. New York: The Free Press, 75–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  39. Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Gene H. Lerner
    2009 Beginning to Respond: Well-Prefaced Responses to Wh-Questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction42(2), 91–115. doi: 10.1080/08351810902864511
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810902864511 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sidnell, Jack & Tanya Stivers
    2013The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Stivers, Tanya & John Heritage
    2001 Breaking the sequential mold: Answering ‘more than the question’ during comprehensive history taking. Text21 (1.2), 151–185.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ten Have, Paul
    2007Doing Conversation Analysis. A Practical Guide. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781849208895
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895 [Google Scholar]
  43. Tracy, Sarah J. & Karen Tracy
    1998 Emotion Labor at 911: a Case Study and Theoretical Critique. Journal of Applied Communication Research26, 390–411. doi: 10.1080/00909889809365516
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889809365516 [Google Scholar]
  44. Vinkhuyzen, Erik , Marilyn Whalen & Margaret Szymanski
    2006 Security, efficiency, and customer service in calls to a financial services organization. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée11/2. 53–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Whalen, Marilyn R. & Don H. Zimmerman
    1987 Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly50. 172–185. doi: 10.2307/2786750
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786750 [Google Scholar]
  46. 1990 Describing trouble: Practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police. Language in Society19, 465–492. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500014779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014779 [Google Scholar]
  47. Whalen, Jack , Don H. Zimmerman
    1998 Observations on the display and managment of emotion in naturally occurring activities: the case of “Hysteria” in calls to 9-1-1. Social Psychological Quarterly61. 141–159. doi: 10.2307/2787066
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2787066 [Google Scholar]
  48. Zimmerman, Don H.
    1984 Talk and Its Occasion: The Case of Calling the Police. In D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 172–185.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 1992 The interactional organization of calls for emergency. In P. Drew , J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 418–469.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error