1887
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore the metaphoric imprint the global financial crisis has left on the discourse of parliamentary budget debates, which are at the intersection of political and economic discourse, as well as the imprint the MPs have tried to leave on the electorate by carefully selecting metaphors to hide agency, disclaim responsibility and project themselves as saviours. We focus both on conceptual and linguistic metaphors, trying, simultaneously, to account for how the metaphors are developed in the debate. The corpus comprises two budget debates held at the time the financial crisis was in full swing (conducted in the Parliament of Montenegro and the UK House of Commons). The recurrent conceptual metaphors related to the economic crisis were analysed for the two parts of the corpus respectively – the results were compared and similarities were observed in terms of the metaphors used and the discourse strategies behind their selection.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.8.2.06sta
2017-07-31
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Richard
    2004 “The Causal Power of Metaphor in Politics: Cueing Democratic Identities in Russia and Beyond.” InMetaphorical World Politics: Rhetorics of Democracy, War and Globalization, ed. by Francis Beer and Christ'l De Landtsheer , 91–120. East Lansing, Mich.: Michigan University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Archakis, Argiris , and Villy Tsakona
    2010 “'The Wolf Wakes up inside Them, Grows Werewolf Hair and Reveals All Their Bullying': The Representation of Parliamentary Discourse in Greek Newspapers”. Journal of Pragmatics42: 912–923. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.015 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey, Richard
    2003 “Conceptual Metaphor, Language, Literature and Pedagogy.” Journal of Language and Learning1 (2): 59–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bayley, Paul
    2004 “The Whys and Wherefores of Analysing Parliamentary Discourse.” InCross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley , 1–44. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.10.01bay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10.01bay [Google Scholar]
  5. Cameron, Lynne
    2008 “Metaphor Shifting in the Dynamics of Talk”. InConfronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic Approach, ed. by Mara Sophia Zanotto , Lynne Cameron and Marinda Cavalcanti , 45–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.173.04cam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.173.04cam [Google Scholar]
  6. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2000 “Metaphor and Vocabulary Reaching in ESP Economics”. English for Specific Purposes: An International Journal19 (2): 149–165. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(98)00025‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00025-8 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2004Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chifane, Cristina
    2013 “Metaphors of the Crisis – A Reflection of the Global Financial Situation.” Management Strategies Journal22 (4): 78–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chilton, Paul , and Mikhail Ilyin
    1993 “Metaphor in Political Discourse: The Case of the ‘Common European House’”. Discourse & Society4 (7): 7–31. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004001002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004001002 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chung, Siaw-Fong , and Kathleen Ahrens
    2004 “Teaching Economy Metaphors: A Psycholinguistic Perspective through the CMM.” In theProceedings of the Thirteenth International Symposium and Book Fair on English Teaching, Vol.2, 1–12. Taipei, Taiwan: English Teachers Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cortés de los Ríos , María Enriqueta
    2010 “Cognitive Devices to Communicate the Economic Crisis: An Analysis through Covers in the Economist.” Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE)20: 81–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dorst, Aletta G.
    2011Metaphor in fiction: Language, Thought and Communication. Oisterwijk, Netherlands: BOXpress.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fairclough, Norman
    1995Critical Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferrari, Federica
    2007 “Metaphor at Work in the Analysis of Political Discourse: Investigating a ‘Preventive War’ Persuasion Strategy”. Discourse & Society18 (5): 603–625. doi: 10.1177/0957926507079737
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507079737 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gadavanij, Savitri
    2002 “Intertextuality as Discourse Strategy: The Case of No-Confidence Debates in Thailand”. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics9: 35–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gelabert-Desnoyer, Jaime
    2008 “Not So Impersonal: Intentionality in the Use of Pronoun Uno in Contemporary Spanish Political Discourse”. Pragmatics18 (3): 407–424. doi: 10.1075/prag.18.3.03gel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18.3.03gel [Google Scholar]
  17. Goatly, Andrew
    1997The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203210000
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203210000 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hanks, Patrick
    2006 “Metaphoricity is Gradable”. InCorpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch and Stefan Gries , 17–35. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hart, Christopher
    2005 “Analysing Political Discourse: Toward a Cognitive Approach”. Critical Discourse Studies2 (2): 189–94. doi: 10.1080/17405900500283706
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900500283706 [Google Scholar]
  20. Heritage, John
    1985 “Analysing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an “Overhearing” Audience”. InHandbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol.III, ed. by Teun van Dijk , 95–119. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Herrmann, J. Berenike
    2013Metaphor in Academic Discourse: Linguistic Forms, Conceptual Structures, Communicative Functions and Cognitive Representations. LOT Dissertation Series, 333. Utrecht: Utrecht Univversity/LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang, Chu-Ren , Siaw-Fong Chung , and Kathleen Ahrens
    2006 “An Ontology-Based Exploration of Knowledge Systems for Metaphor.” InOntologies: A Handbook of Principles, Concepts and Applications in Information Systems. Volume14, ed. by Raj Sharman , Rajiv Kishore , and Ram Ramesh , 489–517. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ilie, Cornelia
    2003 “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates”. Journal of Language and Politics2 (1): 71–92. doi: 10.1075/jlp.2.1.05ili
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.2.1.05ili [Google Scholar]
  24. 2004 “Insulting as (Un)Parliamentary Practice in the British and Swedish Parliaments: A Rhetorical Approach. InCross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley , 45–86. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.10.02ili
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10.02ili [Google Scholar]
  25. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2010Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lakoff, George
    2003 “Metaphor and War, Again”. www.alternet.org/story/15414/?page=entire (accessed on27.01.2010)
  27. Lakoff, George , and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live by. London: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lakoff, George , and Mark Turner
    1989More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Moser, Karin
    2004 “The Role of Metaphors in Acquiring and Transmitting Knowledge”. InEuropean Perspectives on Learning at Work: The Acquisition of Work Process Knowledge, ed. by Martin Fischer , Nicholas Boreham , and Barry Nyhan , 148–165. Luxembourg: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Muller, Cornelia
    2008Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226548265.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226548265.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Müller, Ralph
    2005 “Creative Metaphors in Political Discourse. Theoretical Considerations on the Basis of Swiss Speeches”. Metaphoric.de9: 53–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Musolff, Andreas
    2004Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230504516
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2012 “The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies9 (3): 301–310. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2012.688300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688300 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mutua, Makau
    2001 “Savages, Victims, and Saviors: The Metaphor of Human Rights.” Harvard International Law Journal42 (1): 201–245.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. O’Connor, Kathleen Therese
    1998 “Money and Finance as Solid, Liquid, and Gas in Spanish”. Metaphor and Symbol13 (2): 141–157. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms1302_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1302_4 [Google Scholar]
  36. Orts, María Angeles , and Ana Rojo
    2009 “Metaphor Framing in Spanish Economic Discourse: A Corpus-Based Approach to Metaphor Analysis in the Global Systemic Crisis”. InA Survey of Corpus-Based Research [Recurso electrónico], ed. by Pascual Cantos Gómez and Aquilino Sánchez Pérez , 182–195. Universidad de Murcia: AELINCO.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Pasma, Tryntje
    2011Metaphor and Register Variation: The Personalisation of Dutch News Discourse. Oisterwijk, Netherlands: BOXpress.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Perović, Slavica
    2009Jezik u akciji ['Language in Action']. Podgorica: CID.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rasiah, Parameswary
    2007Evasion in Australia’s Parliamentary Question Time. Perth: University of Western Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Ritchie, David
    2003 “ argument is war – Or Is It a Game of Chess? Multiple Meanings in the Analysis of Implicit Metaphors.” Metaphor and Symbol18 (2): 125–146. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1802_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1802_4 [Google Scholar]
  41. Rječnik srpsko­hrvatskoga književnog jezika ['Dictionary of written Serbo-Croatian']
    Rječnik srpsko­hrvatskoga književnog jezika ['Dictionary of written Serbo-Croatian'] 1967 Novi Sad & Zagreb: Matica srpska i Matica hrvatska.
  42. Semino, Elena , and Michela Masci
    1996 “Politics is Football: Metaphor in the Discourse of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy”. Discourse and Society7 (2): 243–269. doi: 10.1177/0957926596007002005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926596007002005 [Google Scholar]
  43. Shenhav, Shaul
    2008 “Showing and Telling in Parliamentary Discourse: The Case of Repeated Interjections to Rabin’s Speeches in the Israeli Parliament”. Discourse and Society19(2): 223–255. doi: 10.1177/0957926507085953
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507085953 [Google Scholar]
  44. Silaški, Nadežda and Tatjana Đurović
    2010 “The Conceptualisation of the Global Financial Crisis via the Economy Is a Person Metaphor – A Contrastive Study of English and Serbian”. Belgrade: Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature8 (2): 129–139.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Silaški, Nadežda
    2013 “Translating Metaphorical Economic Terms from English into Serbian – Some Strategies and Challenges.” InPhilological Reasearch Today – Language, Literature and Communication: Current Issues in Linguistic Research, ed. by Julijana Vučo and Vesna Polovina , 351–370. Belgrade: University of Belgrade.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Silaški, Nadežda and Annamaria Kilyeni
    2014 “The Money is Solid Metaphor in Economic and Business Terminology in English.” Professional Communication and Translation Studies7: 73–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Škara, Danica
    2009 “Jezična/mentalna rekonstrukcija EU prostora: nove konceptualne metafore“. ['Linguistic/mental reconstruction of the EU space: New conceptual metaphors']. InHrvatski na putu u EU [‘Croatia on its way to the EU’], ed. by Maja Bratanić , 1–28. Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Takahashi, Hiroshi
    2010 “Central Banking as Fluid Dynamics: A Comparative Study of English and Japanese Metaphors of Money”. Language Research Bulletin25: 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. van der Valk, Ineke
    2003 “Right-Wing Parliamentary Discourse on Immigration in France”. Discourse and Society14(3): 309–348. doi: 10.1177/0957926503014003084
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014003084 [Google Scholar]
  50. van Dijk, Teun
    1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis”. Discourse & Society4 (2): 249–283. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
  51. 2001 “Critical Discourse Analysis”. InHandbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Tannen et al. , 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wipf, Bettina
    2010Wine Writing Meets MIPVU: Linguistic Metaphor. Amsterdam: VU University.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Wodak, Ruth
    (ed.) 1989Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/ct.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ct.7 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.8.2.06sta
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.8.2.06sta
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error