Metaphors of parliamentary budget debates in times of crisis

References

1. Anderson, Richard
   2004 “The Causal Power of Metaphor in Politics: Cueing Democratic Identities in Russia and Beyond.” InMetaphorical World Politics: Rhetorics of Democracy, War and Globalization, ed. by Francis Beer and Christ'l De Landtsheer , 91–120. East Lansing, Mich.: Michigan University Press
   [Google Scholar]
2. Archakis, Argiris , and Villy Tsakona
   2010 “'The Wolf Wakes up inside Them, Grows Werewolf Hair and Reveals All Their Bullying': The Representation of Parliamentary Discourse in Greek Newspapers”. Journal of Pragmatics42: 912–923. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.015
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.015 [Google Scholar]
3. Bailey, Richard
   2003 “Conceptual Metaphor, Language, Literature and Pedagogy.” Journal of Language and Learning1 (2): 59–72.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bayley, Paul
   2004 “The Whys and Wherefores of Analysing Parliamentary Discourse.” InCross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley , 1–44. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.10.01bay
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10.01bay [Google Scholar]
5. Cameron, Lynne
   2008 “Metaphor Shifting in the Dynamics of Talk”. InConfronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic Approach, ed. by Mara Sophia Zanotto , Lynne Cameron and Marinda Cavalcanti , 45–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.173.04cam
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.173.04cam [Google Scholar]
6. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
   2000 “Metaphor and Vocabulary Reaching in ESP Economics”. English for Specific Purposes: An International Journal19 (2): 149–165. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(98)00025‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00025-8 [Google Scholar]
7. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
   2004 Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230000612
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
8. Chifane, Cristina
   2013 “Metaphors of the Crisis – A Reflection of the Global Financial Situation.” Management Strategies Journal22 (4): 78–84.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chilton, Paul , and Mikhail Ilyin
   1993 “Metaphor in Political Discourse: The Case of the ‘Common European House’”. Discourse & Society4 (7): 7–31. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004001002
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004001002 [Google Scholar]
10. Chung, Siaw-Fong , and Kathleen Ahrens
    2004 “Teaching Economy Metaphors: A Psycholinguistic Perspective through the CMM.” In theProceedings of the Thirteenth International Symposium and Book Fair on English Teaching, Vol.2, 1–12. Taipei, Taiwan: English Teachers Association.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cortés de los Ríos , María Enriqueta
    2010 “Cognitive Devices to Communicate the Economic Crisis: An Analysis through Covers in the Economist.” Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE)20: 81–106.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dorst, Aletta G.
    2011 Metaphor in fiction: Language, Thought and Communication. Oisterwijk, Netherlands: BOXpress.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fairclough, Norman
    1995 Critical Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ferrari, Federica
    2007 “Metaphor at Work in the Analysis of Political Discourse: Investigating a ‘Preventive War’ Persuasion Strategy”. Discourse & Society18 (5): 603–625. doi: 10.1177/0957926507079737
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507079737 [Google Scholar]
15. Gadavanij, Savitri
    2002 “Intertextuality as Discourse Strategy: The Case of No-Confidence Debates in Thailand”. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics9: 35–55.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gelabert-Desnoyer, Jaime
    2008 “Not So Impersonal: Intentionality in the Use of Pronoun Uno in Contemporary Spanish Political Discourse”. Pragmatics18 (3): 407–424. doi: 10.1075/prag.18.3.03gel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18.3.03gel [Google Scholar]
17. Goatly, Andrew
    1997 The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203210000
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203210000 [Google Scholar]
18. Hanks, Patrick
    2006 “Metaphoricity is Gradable”. InCorpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch and Stefan Gries , 17–35. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hart, Christopher
    2005 “Analysing Political Discourse: Toward a Cognitive Approach”. Critical Discourse Studies2 (2): 189–94. doi: 10.1080/17405900500283706
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900500283706 [Google Scholar]
20. Heritage, John
    1985 “Analysing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an “Overhearing” Audience”. InHandbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol.III, ed. by Teun van Dijk , 95–119. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Herrmann, J. Berenike
    2013 Metaphor in Academic Discourse: Linguistic Forms, Conceptual Structures, Communicative Functions and Cognitive Representations. LOT Dissertation Series, 333. Utrecht: Utrecht Univversity/LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Huang, Chu-Ren , Siaw-Fong Chung , and Kathleen Ahrens
    2006 “An Ontology-Based Exploration of Knowledge Systems for Metaphor.” InOntologies: A Handbook of Principles, Concepts and Applications in Information Systems. Volume14, ed. by Raj Sharman , Rajiv Kishore , and Ram Ramesh , 489–517. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ilie, Cornelia
    2003 “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates”. Journal of Language and Politics2 (1): 71–92. doi: 10.1075/jlp.2.1.05ili
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.2.1.05ili [Google Scholar]
24. Ilie, Cornelia
    2004 “Insulting as (Un)Parliamentary Practice in the British and Swedish Parliaments: A Rhetorical Approach. InCross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley , 45–86. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.10.02ili
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10.02ili [Google Scholar]
25. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2010 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lakoff, George
    2003 “Metaphor and War, Again”. www.alternet.org/story/15414/?page=entire (accessed on27.01.2010)
27. Lakoff, George , and Mark Johnson
    1980 Metaphors We Live by. London: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lakoff, George , and Mark Turner
    1989 More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
29. Moser, Karin
    2004 “The Role of Metaphors in Acquiring and Transmitting Knowledge”. InEuropean Perspectives on Learning at Work: The Acquisition of Work Process Knowledge, ed. by Martin Fischer , Nicholas Boreham , and Barry Nyhan , 148–165. Luxembourg: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Muller, Cornelia
    2008 Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226548265.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226548265.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
31. Müller, Ralph
    2005 “Creative Metaphors in Political Discourse. Theoretical Considerations on the Basis of Swiss Speeches”. Metaphoric.de9: 53–73.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Musolff, Andreas
    2004 Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230504516
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
33. Musolff, Andreas
    2012 “The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies9 (3): 301–310. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2012.688300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688300 [Google Scholar]
34. Mutua, Makau
    2001 “Savages, Victims, and Saviors: The Metaphor of Human Rights.” Harvard International Law Journal42 (1): 201–245.
    [Google Scholar]
35. O’Connor, Kathleen Therese
    1998 “Money and Finance as Solid, Liquid, and Gas in Spanish”. Metaphor and Symbol13 (2): 141–157. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms1302_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1302_4 [Google Scholar]
36. Orts, María Angeles , and Ana Rojo
    2009 “Metaphor Framing in Spanish Economic Discourse: A Corpus-Based Approach to Metaphor Analysis in the Global Systemic Crisis”. InA Survey of Corpus-Based Research [Recurso electrónico], ed. by Pascual Cantos Gómez and Aquilino Sánchez Pérez , 182–195. Universidad de Murcia: AELINCO.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pasma, Tryntje
    2011 Metaphor and Register Variation: The Personalisation of Dutch News Discourse. Oisterwijk, Netherlands: BOXpress.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Perović, Slavica
    2009 Jezik u akciji ['Language in Action']. Podgorica: CID.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Rasiah, Parameswary
    2007 Evasion in Australia’s Parliamentary Question Time. Perth: University of Western Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ritchie, David
    2003 “ argument is war – Or Is It a Game of Chess? Multiple Meanings in the Analysis of Implicit Metaphors.” Metaphor and Symbol18 (2): 125–146. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1802_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1802_4 [Google Scholar]
41. Rječnik srpsko­hrvatskoga književnog jezika ['Dictionary of written Serbo-Croatian']
    Rječnik srpsko­hrvatskoga književnog jezika ['Dictionary of written Serbo-Croatian'] 1967 Novi Sad & Zagreb: Matica srpska i Matica hrvatska.
42. Semino, Elena , and Michela Masci
    1996 “Politics is Football: Metaphor in the Discourse of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy”. Discourse and Society7 (2): 243–269. doi: 10.1177/0957926596007002005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926596007002005 [Google Scholar]
43. Shenhav, Shaul
    2008 “Showing and Telling in Parliamentary Discourse: The Case of Repeated Interjections to Rabin’s Speeches in the Israeli Parliament”. Discourse and Society19(2): 223–255. doi: 10.1177/0957926507085953
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507085953 [Google Scholar]
44. Silaški, Nadežda and Tatjana Đurović
    2010 “The Conceptualisation of the Global Financial Crisis via the Economy Is a Person Metaphor – A Contrastive Study of English and Serbian”. Belgrade: Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature8 (2): 129–139.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Silaški, Nadežda
    2013 “Translating Metaphorical Economic Terms from English into Serbian – Some Strategies and Challenges.” InPhilological Reasearch Today – Language, Literature and Communication: Current Issues in Linguistic Research, ed. by Julijana Vučo and Vesna Polovina , 351–370. Belgrade: University of Belgrade.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Silaški, Nadežda and Annamaria Kilyeni
    2014 “The Money is Solid Metaphor in Economic and Business Terminology in English.” Professional Communication and Translation Studies7: 73–80.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Škara, Danica
    2009 “Jezična/mentalna rekonstrukcija EU prostora: nove konceptualne metafore“. ['Linguistic/mental reconstruction of the EU space: New conceptual metaphors']. InHrvatski na putu u EU [‘Croatia on its way to the EU’], ed. by Maja Bratanić , 1–28. Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Takahashi, Hiroshi
    2010 “Central Banking as Fluid Dynamics: A Comparative Study of English and Japanese Metaphors of Money”. Language Research Bulletin25: 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
49. van der Valk, Ineke
    2003 “Right-Wing Parliamentary Discourse on Immigration in France”. Discourse and Society14(3): 309–348. doi: 10.1177/0957926503014003084
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014003084 [Google Scholar]
50. van Dijk, Teun
    1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis”. Discourse & Society4 (2): 249–283. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
51. van Dijk, Teun
    2001 “Critical Discourse Analysis”. InHandbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Tannen et al. , 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Wipf, Bettina
    2010 Wine Writing Meets MIPVU: Linguistic Metaphor. Amsterdam: VU University.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Wodak, Ruth
    (ed.) 1989 Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/ct.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ct.7 [Google Scholar]