Volume 8, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This conversation analytic paper investigates how speakers self-position or are other-positioned as members of a certain social group (e.g., competent speakers of a language) through other-initiated repair. Findings illustrate the complexity of linguistic membership categories by demonstrating that they continually shift depending on local interactional goals and documenting how shifts are accomplished. The different levels and types of linguistic and cultural knowledge that are invoked in instances of repair on specific lexical items demonstrate the complexity of linguistic membership categorization, and this indicates a need to problematize the use of a priori and overly-vague labels like ‘non-native speaker’. Findings contribute to our understanding of the functions of other-initiated repair and the mechanisms of co-constructing membership (categorization) and thus social identity in interaction. They also raise questions about the relationship between amounts and types of knowledge and further our understanding of the construction of expert/novice categories via knowledge displays and negotiation.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Antaki, Charles , Susan Condor , and Mark Levine
    1996 “Social Identities in Talk: Speakers’ own Orientations.” British Journal of Social Psychology35 (4): 473–492. doi:  10.1111/j.2044‑8309.1996.tb01109.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01109.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson, J. Maxwell , and John Heritage
    eds. 1984Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Betz, Emma , Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm , Veronica Drake , and Andrea Golato
    2013 “Third-position Repeats in German: The Case of Repair-and-Request-for-Information Sequences.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion141: 133–166 (www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carroll, Donald
    2000 “Precision Timing in Novice-to-Novice L2 Conversations.” Issues in Applied Linguistics11 (1): 67–110. 10.5070/L4111005025
    https://doi.org/10.5070/L4111005025 [Google Scholar]
  5. Egbert, Maria
    1997 “Some Interactional Achievements of Other-initiated Repair in Multiperson Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics27 (5): 611–34. doi:  10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00039‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00039-2 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2004 “Other-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization – Some Conversational Events that Trigger Linguistic and Regional Membership Categorization.” Journal of Pragmatics36 (8): 1467–98. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2003.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2009Der Reparaturmechanismus in deutschen Gesprächen [The repair mechanism in German talk-in-interaction]. Gesprächsforschung, Mannheim.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Firth, Alan , and Johannes Wagner
    1997 “On Discourse, Communication, and (Some) Fundamental Concepts in SLA Research.” The Modern Language Journal81 (3): 285–300. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1997.tb05480.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Goodwin, Charles
    1979 “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas , 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodwin, Marjorie
    1983 “Searching for a Word as an Interactive Activity.” InSemiotics, ed. by John N. Deely and Margot D. Lenhart , 129–138. New York: Plenum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Heritage, John
    1989 “Current Developments in Conversation Analysis.” InConversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspectiveed. by Derek Roger , and Peter Bull , 21–47. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2013 “Epistemics in Conversation.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysised. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers , 370–394. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heritage, John , and Geoffrey Raymond
    2005 “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly68 (1): 15–38. doi:  10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hosoda, Yuri
    2000 “Other-repair in Japanese Conversations between Nonnative and Native Speakers.” Issues in Applied Linguistics11 (1): 39–63. 10.5070/L4111005023
    https://doi.org/10.5070/L4111005023 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2002 “Analyzing Japanese Native-Nonnative Speaker Conversation: Categories, Other-repair, and Production Delay.” PhD diss., Temple University.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kasper, Gabriele
    2004 “Participant Orientations in German Conversation-for-Learning.” The Modern Language Journal88 (4): 551–567. doi:  10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑18‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-18-.x [Google Scholar]
  17. 2009 “Locating Cognition in Second Language Interaction and Learning: Inside the Skull or in Public View?” International Review of Applied Linguistics47 (1): 11–36. doi:  10.1515/iral.2009.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kurhila, Salla
    2006Second Language Interaction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/pbns.145
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.145 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lave, Jean , and Wenger, Etienne
    1991Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  20. Maheux-Pelletier, Geneviève , and Andrea Golato
    2008 “Repair in Membership Categorization in French.” Language in Society37 (5): 689–712. doi:  10.1017/S0047404508080998
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404508080998 [Google Scholar]
  21. Olsher, David
    2004 “Collaborative Group Work in Second and Foreign Language Classrooms: Talk, Embodiment and Sequential Organization.” PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Raymond, Geoffrey , and John Heritage
    2006 The Epistemics of Social Relations: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society35 (5): 677–705. doi:  10.1017/S0047404506060325
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325 [Google Scholar]
  23. Sacks, Harvey
    1972a “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Data for Doing Sociology.” InStudies in Social Interactioned. by David N. Sudnow , 31–74. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1972b “On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” InDirections in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communicationed. by John J. Gumperz , and Dell Hymes , 325–345. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1992 InLectures on Conversation (Vol.21), ed. by Gail Jefferson . Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1987 “Recycled Turn Beginnings: A Precise Repair Mechanism in Conversation’s Turntaking Organization.” InTalk and Social Organization, ed. by Graham Button and John R. E. Lee , 70–85. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Schegloff, Emmanuel A.
    2000 “When ‘Others’ Initiate Repair.” Applied Linguistics21 (2): 205–243. doi:  10.1093/applin/21.2.205
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.2.205 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2007a “A Tutorial on Membership Categorization.” Journal of Pragmatics39 (3): 462–482. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2007bSequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  30. Schegloff, Emmanuel A. , Gail Jefferson , and Harvey Sacks
    1977 “The Preference for Self-correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language53 (2): 361–382. doi:  10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  31. Schegloff, Emmanuel A. , Irene Koshik , Sally Jacoby , and David Olsher
    2002 “Conversation Analysis and Applied Linguistics.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics221: 3–31. doi:  10.1017/S0267190502000016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000016 [Google Scholar]
  32. Seedhouse, Paul
    2004The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen
    2015 “On Multimodal and Coordinated Participation in Second Language Interaction: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” InDialogue in Multilingual and Multimodal Communities, ed. by Dale A. Koike and Carl S. Blyth , 79–103. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/ds.27.03tal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.27.03tal [Google Scholar]
  34. Wong, Jean
    2000 “Delayed Next Turn Repair Initiation in Native/non-native Speaker English Conversation.” Applied Linguistics21 (2): 244–267. doi:  10.1093/applin/21.2.244
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.2.244 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wong, Jean , and David Olsher
    2000 “Reflections on Conversation Analysis and Nonnative Speaker Talk: An Interview with Emanuel A. Schegloff.” Issues in Applied Linguistics11 (1): 111–128.. 10.5070/L4111005026
    https://doi.org/10.5070/L4111005026 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): epistemics; expert/novice interaction; identity; membership categories; positioning; repair
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error