But as a stance marker in Nigerian investigative public hearings

References

1. Aijmer, Karin
   2013 Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748635511
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748635511 [Google Scholar]
2. Anthonissen, Christine
   2006 “Critical Discourse Analysis as an Analytic Tool in Considering Selected Prominent Features of TRC Testimonies.” Journal of Language and Politics5(1):171–196. doi:  10.1075/jlp.5.1.05ant
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.5.1.05ant [Google Scholar]
3. Aull, L. Laura , and Zak Lancaster
   2014 “Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writings: A corpus-based comparison.” Written Communication32(2):151–183. doi:  10.1177/0741088314527055
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314527055 [Google Scholar]
4. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
   1981 The Dialogic Imagination (translated by C. Emerson & M. Holquist ). Austin: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baratta, Alexander M.
   2009 “Revealing Stance through Passive Voice.” Journal of Pragmatics411: 1406–1421. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.010
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.010 [Google Scholar]
6. Berlin, Lawrence N.
   2007 “Cooperative Conflict and Evasive Language: The Case of the 9–11 Commission Hearings.” InContext and Appropriateness, ed. by A. Fetzer , 167–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:  10.1075/pbns.162.10ber
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.162.10ber [Google Scholar]
7. Berlin, Lawrence N.
   2008 “‘I Think, Therefore …’ Commitment in Political Testimony.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology27 (4): 372–383. doi:  10.1177/0261927X08322480
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322480 [Google Scholar]
8. Bernard, Taryn
   2009 Justificatory Discourse of the Perpetrator in TRC Testimonies: A discourse-historical Analysis. Unpublished MA Thesis. Stellenbosch University.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Biber, Douglas
   2006 “Stance in Spoken and Written University Registers.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes51: 97–116. doi:  10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001 [Google Scholar]
10. Biber, Douglas , Stig Johansson , Geoffrey Leech , Susan Conrad , and Edward Finegan
    1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bock, Zanni
    2007 A Discourse Analysis of Selected Truth and Reconciliation Commission Testimonies: Appraisal and Genre. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of the Western Cape.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bock, Zanni
    2008 “‘Language has a heart’: Linguistic markers of evaluation in selected TRC testimonies.” Language of Multicultural Discourses3(3):189–203. doi:  10.1080/17447140802381201
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17447140802381201 [Google Scholar]
13. Bock, Zanni
    2011 Code-switching: An appraisal resource in TRC testimonies. Functions of Language, 18 (2): 183–209 doi:  10.1075/fol.18.2.02boc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.18.2.02boc [Google Scholar]
14. Bock, Zanni , Ngwanya Mazwi , Sifundo Metula , and Nosisi Mpolweni-Zantsi
    2006 “An Analysis of What Has Been ‘Lost’ in the Interpretation and Transcription Process of Selected TRC Testimonies.” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS331:1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cavalieri, Silvia
    2009 “Reformulation and Conflict in the Witness Examination: The case of Public Inquiries.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law22 (2): 209–221. doi:  10.1007/s11196‑009‑9103‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-009-9103-y [Google Scholar]
16. Du Bois, John W.
    2007 “The Stance Triangle.” InStancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson , 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
17. Du Bois, John W. , Stephan Schuetze-Coburn , Susanna Cumming , & Danae Paolino
    1993 “Outline of discourse transcription.” InTalking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Researched. by Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert , 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Englebretson, Robert
    2007 “Stancetaking in Discourse: An Introduction.” InStancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson , 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/pbns.164.02eng
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.02eng [Google Scholar]
19. Fraser, Bruce
    1996 “Pragmatic Markers.” Pragmatics6 (2): 167–190. doi:  10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra [Google Scholar]
20. Fraser, Bruce
    2006 “Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers.” InApproaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by K. Fischer , 189–204. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fraser, Bruce
    2009 “An Account of Discourse Markers.” International Review of Pragmatics11: 293–320. doi:  10.1163/187730909X12538045489818
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187730909X12538045489818 [Google Scholar]
22. Fraser, Bruce
    2011 “The Sequencing of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English.” Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture11: 29–35
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fraser, Bruce
    2013 “Combinations of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English.” International Review of Pragmatics51: 318–340. doi:  10.1163/18773109‑13050209
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-13050209 [Google Scholar]
24. Fraser, Bruce
    2015 “The Combining of Discourse Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics861: 48–53, doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.007 [Google Scholar]
25. Gray, Bethany and Douglas Biber
    2015 “Stance Markers.” InCorpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann , 219–248 doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139057493.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057493.012 [Google Scholar]
26. Hyland, Ken
    2005 “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies7 (2): 173–192. doi:  10.1177/1461445605050365
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 [Google Scholar]
27. Keisanen, Tina and Elise Kärkkäinen
    2014 “Stance.” InPragmatics of Discourse, ed. by Klaus P. Schneider and Anne Baron , 295–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, doi:  10.1515/9783110214406‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214406-012 [Google Scholar]
28. Martin, J. R. & Peter White
    2005 the Language age of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:  10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
29. Mei, S. Wu
    2006 “Creating a Contrastive Rhetorical Stance: Investigating the Strategy of Problemitisation in Students’ Argumentation.” RELC37 (3): 329–353. doi:  10.1177/0033688206071316
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206071316 [Google Scholar]
30. Meinig, Bob
    1998 Public Hearings: When and How to Hold Them. MRSC Publications. RetrievedJune 2, 2008fromwww.mrsc.org/focuspub/hearings.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
31. Mey, Jacob L.
    2001 Pragmatics: An Introduction. Malden: Blackwell Publishers
    [Google Scholar]
32. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
33. Szczyrbak, Magdalena
    2014 “Stancetaking Strategies in Judicial Discourse: Evidence from US Supreme Court Opinions.” Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis1311: 91–120.
    [Google Scholar]
34. The Law Reform Commission
    The Law Reform Commission (2003) Consultation Paper on Public Inquiries including Tribunals of Inquiry. Dublin: The Law Reform Commission.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Unuabonah, Foluke
    2011 “Event Models: A Socio-Cognitive Study of Selected Interrogations in 2008 Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing on Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Administration In Nigeria.” Studies in Literature and Language3 (1): 37–44.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Unuabonah, Foluke
    2012a “The Generic Structure of Presentations in Quasi-Judicial Public Hearings on the FCT Administration in Nigeria in 2008.” California Linguistic Notes37 (2): 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Unuabonah, Foluke
    2012b Interaction Structure and Pragmatic Features in 2008 National Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing on Federal Capital Territory Administration in Nigeria. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Ibadan.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Unuabonah, Foluke
    2016 “Contextual Beliefs in a Nigerian Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing”. Journal of Asian and African studies5 (5): 619-633. doi:  10.1177/0021909614553238.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909614553238 [Google Scholar]
39. Unuabonah, Foluke
    2017 “‘Are you saying?’ Metapragmatic comments in Nigerian quasi-judicial public hearings”. Pragmatics27 (1): 115-143. doi:  10.1075/prag.27.1.05unu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.1.05unu [Google Scholar]
40. Unuabonah, Foluke
    2015 “The Generic Structure of a Public Hearing.” InEssays on Language, Communication and Literature in Africa, ed. by Akin Odebunmi and Joyce Mathangwane , 105–130. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Verdoolaege, Annelies
    2009a “The Audience as Actor: The Participation Status of the Audience at the Victim Hearings of the South African TRC”. Discourse Studies, 11(4): 441–463. doi:  10.1177/1461445609105219
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609105219 [Google Scholar]
42. Verdoolaege, Annelies
    2009b “Dealing with a Traumatic Past: The Victim Hearings of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission and their Reconciliation Discourse”. Critical Discourse Studies6(4): 297–309. doi:  10.1080/17405900903181135
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903181135 [Google Scholar]
43. White, Peter R. R.
    2011 “Appraisal.” InDiscursive Pragmaticsed. by Jan Zienkowski , Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren , 14–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/hoph.8.02whi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.8.02whi [Google Scholar]