1887
Volume 8, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Since MacKinnon’s (1979) ground-breaking work in which she coined the term sexual harassment, there has been very little consensus as to what it actually is. Using callers’ stories of male sexual harassment taken from Kenyan talk radio, the purpose of this paper is to analyse the in situ production of an emic definition of (male) sexual harassment. Further, using positioning theory as a methodology, this paper aims (1) to make visible the gendered identity work that defining, or not defining, an event as male sexual harassment occasions and (2) to show how hegemonic masculinity is achieved through stories and their evaluation by the radio host and other callers who talk certain masculinities into being as normative and others as deviant.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.8.3.06mue
2017-10-13
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Atkinson, J. Maxwell
    1982 “Understanding formality: the categorization and production of ‘formal’ interaction.” British Journal of Sociology33: 86–117. doi: 10.2307/589338
    https://doi.org/10.2307/589338 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bamberg, Michael
    1997 “Positioning between structure and performance”. Journal of Narrative and Life History7: 335–342. doi: 10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos [Google Scholar]
  3. 2004 “Considering counter narrative”. InConsidering counter-narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense, ed. by Michael Bamberg and Molly Andrews , 351–372. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sin.4.43bam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.4.43bam [Google Scholar]
  4. 2011 “Narrative practice and identity navigation”. InVarieties of narrative analysised. by James Holstein and Jaber Gubrium , 99–124. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bamberg, Michael , and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
    2008 “Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis”. Text & Talk28(3): 377–396. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2008.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bamberg, Michael , Anna De Fina , and Deborah Schiffrin
    2011 “Discourse and identity construction”. InHandbook of identity theory and researched. by Seth Schwartz , Koen Luyckx and Vivan Vignoles , 177–199. Berlin & New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4419‑7988‑9_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_8 [Google Scholar]
  7. Beach, Wayne
    1993 “Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “okay” usages”. Journal of Pragmatics19(4): 325–352. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90092‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4 [Google Scholar]
  8. Berdahl, Jennifer
    2007 “Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy”. Academy of Management Review32(2): 641–658. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.24351879
    https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.24351879 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bingham, Shereen
    1994 “Introduction: Framing sexual harassment – defining a discursive focus of study”. InConceptualizing sexual harassment as discursive practiceed. by Shereen Bingham , 1–16. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonuke, Paul
    2016 End of Maina Kageni and Mwalimu King’ang’i. Business Today (June25th). Available at: www.businesstoday.co.ke/end-of-maina-kageni-and-mwalimu-kingangi/
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1979Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Clair, Robin
    1994 “Hegemony and harassment: A discursive practice”. InConceptualizing sexual harassment as discursive practiceed. by Shereen Bingham , 59–70. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clifton, Jonathan and Dorien Van De Mieroop
    2016Master narratives, identities, and the stories of former slaves. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sin.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.22 [Google Scholar]
  14. Connell, R. W. [Raewyn]
    1995Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. De Fina, Anna
    2015 “Narrative and identities”. InThe Handbook of Narrative Analysised. by Anna De Fina and Alexandra Georgakopoulou , 351–368. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell,
    [Google Scholar]
  16. De Fina, Anna and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
    2008 “Analysing narratives as practices”. Qualitative Research8(3): 379–387. doi: 10.1177/1468794106093634
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106093634 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dougherty, Debbie
    1999 “Dialogue through standpoint understanding women’s and men’s standpoints of sexual harassment”. Management Communication Quarterly12(3): 436–468. doi: 10.1177/0893318999123003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318999123003 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dworkin, Andrea
    1987Intercourse. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Eglin, Peter , and Stephen Hester
    1992 “Category, predicate and task: The pragmatics of practical action.” Semiotica88: 243–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Eyre, Linda
    2000 “The discursive framing of sexual harassment in a university community”. Gender and Education12(3): 293–307. doi: 10.1080/713668301
    https://doi.org/10.1080/713668301 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fitzgerald, Louise
    1996 “Sexual harassment: the definition and measurement of a construct”. InSexual Harassment on College Campuses: Abusing the Ivory Power (2nd edition) ed. by Michele Paludi , 25–47. New York: SUNY Press,
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fitzgerald, Richard , and William Housley
    2002 “Identity, categorization and sequential organization: the sequential and categorial flow of identity in a radio phone-in””. Discourse & Society13(5): 579–602. doi: 10.1177/0957926502013005275
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013005275 [Google Scholar]
  23. Freeman, Mark
    2006 “Life on holiday? In defense of big stories”. Narrative Inquiry16(1): 131–138. doi: 10.1075/ni.16.1.17fre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.17fre [Google Scholar]
  24. Gee, James
    1999An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    2007Small stories, interaction and identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sin.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.8 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gramsci, Antonio
    1971Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence Wishart,
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Grauerholz, Elizabeth
    1994 “Gender socialization and communication: The inscription of sexual harassment in social life”. InConceptualizing sexual harassment as discursive practiceed. by Shereen Bingham , 33–42. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hakim, Catherine
    2010, “Erotic capital”. European Sociological Review2(5): 499–518. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcq014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcq014 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hale, Angela , and Maggie Opondo
    2005 “Humanising the cut flower chain: Confronting the realities of flower production for workers in Kenya.” Antipode37 (2): 301–323. doi: 10.1111/j.0066‑4812.2005.00494.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00494.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Heritage, John
    1997 “Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analysing data”. InQualitative research: Theory, method and practiceed. by David Silverman , 161–182. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hutchby, Ian
    1992 “Confrontation talk: Aspects of ‘interruption’ in argument sequences on talk radio”. Text and Talk12(3): 343–372.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 1996 “Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show”. Discourse & Society7(4): 481–497. doi: 10.1177/0957926596007004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926596007004003 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2006Media talk: Conversation analysis and the study of broadcasting. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Jefferson, Gail
    1978 “Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation”. InStudies in the organization of conversational interactioned. by Jim Schenkein 219–248. New York: Academic. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kameri-Mbote, Patricia
    2000 “Violence against women in Kenya: an analysis of law, policy and institutions”. International Environmental Law Research Centre (IELRC) Working Paper.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kiesling, Scott
    2006 “Hegemonic identity making in narrative”. InDiscourse and identityed. by Anna De Fina , Deborah Schiffrin , and Michael Bamberg , 261–297. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511584459.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584459.014 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2007 “Men, masculinities, and language”. Language and Linguistics Compass1(6): 653–673. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00035.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00035.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Kitzinger, Celia , and Alison Thomas
    1995 “Sexual harassment: A discursive approach”. InFeminism and discourse: Psychological perspectivesed. by Sue Wilkinson and Celia Kitzinger , 32–48. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Labov, William , and Joshua Waletzky
    1967 “Narrative Analysis”, InEssays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. by June Helm , 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Landis-Schiff, Tom
    1996 “Sexual harassment: Why men don’t understand it”. Initiatives57(2): 15–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lee, Deborah
    2000 “Hegemonic masculinity and male feminisation: The sexual harassment of men at work”. Journal of Gender Studies9(2): 141–155. doi: 10.1080/713677986
    https://doi.org/10.1080/713677986 [Google Scholar]
  42. Lukes, Steven
    1974Power: A radical view. Vol.1. Macmillan, London. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑02248‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 [Google Scholar]
  43. MacKinnon, Catharine
    1979Sexual harassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mahugu, Mary , Wanjiku Jennifer Khamasi , Kisilu Kitainge , G. Were , Rachel Karei , Fatuma Karei and Hosea Kiplagat
    2013 “Reversed roles? Sexual harassment of male students by female colleagues”. Journal of African Studies in Educational Management and Leadership2:23–38
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Mazeland, Harrie , and Huiskes, Mike
    2001 “Dutch ‘BUT’ as a sequential conjunction: Its use as a resumption marker”. InStudies in Interactional Linguisticsed. by Margret Selting and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen , 141–169. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.10.08maz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10.08maz [Google Scholar]
  46. Media Council of Kenya
    Media Council of Kenya 2014Free Speech or Cheap Talk. Assessing the application of ethical standards and professionalism in talk radio. Media Council of Kenya. Nairobi. Kenya. Available at: www.mediacouncil.or.ke/en/mck/jdownloads/MEDIA%20MONITORING%20REPORTS/media_monitoring_report_on_radiotalk_shows_19_may_2014.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Montemurro, Beth , and Jenna Marie Siefken
    2014 “Cougars on the prowl? New perceptions of older women’s sexuality”. Journal of Aging Studies28: 35–43 doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2013.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2013.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  48. Muasya, Juliet
    2014 “Effects of sexual harassment on women student’s access to opportunities and facilities: a case study of the University of Nairobi, Kenya”. Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences3: 83–90
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Muir, Janette and Kathryn Mangus
    1994 “Talk about sexual harassment: women’s stories on a woman’s story”. InConceptualizing sexual harassment as discursive practiceed. by Shereen Bingham , 91–106. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Onsongo, Jane
    2006 “Gender inequalities in universities in Kenya.” InGender inequalities in Kenyaeds. by Colin Creighton and Felicia Yieke , 31–48. UNESCO
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” InSocial Action: Studies in Conversation Analysised. by J. M. Atkinson and John Heritage , 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Psathas, George
    1995Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781412983792
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983792 [Google Scholar]
  53. Peräkylä, Anssi
    2011 “Validity in research on naturally occurring social interaction.” InQualitative researched. by David Silverman (Third Edition), 365–382. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Pina, Afroditi , Theresa Gannon , and, Benjamin Saunders
    2009 “An overview of the literature on sexual harassment: Perpetrator, theory, and treatment issues”. Aggression and Violent Behavior14(2): 126–138. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  55. Quinn, Beth
    2002 “Sexual harassment and masculinity. The power and meaning of “girl watching”. Gender & Society16(3): 386–402. doi: 10.1177/0891243202016003007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243202016003007 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sacks, Harvey
    1974 “An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation”. InExplorations in the ethnography of speakinged. by Richard Bauman & Joel Sherzer , 337–353. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 1992Lectures on conversation. Oxford & Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Scarduzio, Jennifer , and Patricia Geist-Martin
    2010 “Accounting for victimization: Male professors’ ideological positioning in stories of sexual harassment”. Management Communication Quarterly24(3): 419–445. doi: 10.1177/0893318909358746
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909358746 [Google Scholar]
  59. Sifuna, Daniel N.
    2006 “A review of major obstacles to women’s participation in higher education in Kenya.” Research in Post‐Compulsory Education11(1): 85–105. doi: 10.1080/13596740500507995
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13596740500507995 [Google Scholar]
  60. Stivers, Tanya
    2008 “Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction41(1): 31–57. doi: 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
  61. Thornborrow, Joanna
    2007 “Narrative, opinion and situated argument in talk show discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics39(8): 1436–1453. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  62. Vohlídalová, Marta
    2011 “The perception and construction of sexual harassment by Czech university students”. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review6: 1119–1147.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.8.3.06mue
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): assessments , hegemonic masculinity , Kenya , radio talk , sexual harassment and small stories
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error