The question of power in language classes from a critical discourse analysis perspective

References

1. Baker, Paul
   2006 Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, Paul and Sibonile Ellece
   2011 Key terms in discourse analysis. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barnes, Douglas
   1969 “Language in the secondary classroom”. InLanguage, the learner and the school, ed. by Douglas Barnes , James Britton , and Harold Rosen . 11–77.Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bellack, Arno A. , Herbert Kliebard , Ronald Hyman , and Frank Smith
   1966 The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brookfield, Stephen
   2005 The power of critical theory for adult learning and teaching. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Fairclough, Norman
   1995 Critical Discourse Analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Fairclough, Norman
   2001 Language and Power (2nd ed.). Harlow, U.K.: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Flanders, Ned A.
   1970 Analyzing teaching behavior. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fisher, Ros and Shirley Larkin
   2008 “Pedagogy or ideological struggle? An examination of pupils’ and teachers’ expectations for talk in the classroom.” Language and Education22 (1): 1–16. doi: 10.2167/le706.0
   https://doi.org/10.2167/le706.0 [Google Scholar]
10. Fröhlich, Maria , Nina Spada , and Patrick Allen
    1985 “Differences in the communicative orientation of L2 classrooms.” TESOL Quarterly19 (1): 28–57. doi: 10.2307/3586771
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586771 [Google Scholar]
11. Gee, James Paul
    1996 The social linguistics and literacies: Ideology discourses. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gee, James Paul
    1999 An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gee, James Paul
    2004 “Discourse analysis: what makes it critical?” InAn introduction to critical discourse analysis in education, ed. by Rebecca Rogers . 19–50. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Giddens, Anthony
    1984 The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hofstede, Geert
    2001 Culture’s Consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Berkeley, Calif.: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hunt, Kellogg W.
    1970 “Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults.” Society for the Research in Child Development Monograph134 (1): 1–67.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kumaravadivelu, B.
    1999 “Critical classroom discourse analysis.” TESOL Quarterly33(3): 453–84. doi: 10.2307/3587674
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587674 [Google Scholar]
18. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2000 Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Marcuse, Herbert
    1964 One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Matusov, Eugene
    2007 “Applying Bakhtin scholarship on discourse in education: A critical review essay”. Educational Theory57(2): 215–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1741‑5446.2007.00253.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2007.00253.x [Google Scholar]
21. Menard-Warwick, Julia
    2008 “Because she made beds every day: Social positioning, classroom discourse, and language learning.” Applied Linguistics29 (2): 267–89. doi: 10.1093/applin/amm053
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm053 [Google Scholar]
22. Partington, Alan
    2004 “Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast.” InCorpora and discourse, ed. by Alan Partington , John Morley , and Louann Haarman , 11–20. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak
    2001 Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Sinclair, John and Malcolm Coulthard
    1975 Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Van Dijk, Teun
    1998 Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Van Dijk, Teun
    2001 “Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity”. InMethods of critical discourse analysisby Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer , 95–120. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9780857028020.d7
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.d7 [Google Scholar]
27. Walsh, Steve
    2006 Investigating classroom discourse. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Wodak, Ruth
    2001 “What CDA is about – a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments.” InMethods of critical discourse analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer , 1–13. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]