Volume 8, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Informed by the major tenets of critical discourse analysis, the present study attempted to expose the chasm between veteran English teachers enjoying a nation-wide popularity and those linguistically talented novices achieving locally mediocre fame in the Iranian EFL context. In so doing, two highly competent English teachers, each as a prime example of the above-mentioned camps, were selected to serve as the main participants of the research. The analysis of their classroom talk indicated that linguistic excellence could not fulfill the role of educated experience as far as discourse competence was concerned. In all, the discursive strategies used by the experienced teacher seemed to manifest his recognition of students' voices and created a more heteroglossic atmosphere in the classroom.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baker, Paul
    2006Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Paul and Sibonile Ellece
    2011Key terms in discourse analysis. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnes, Douglas
    1969 “Language in the secondary classroom”. InLanguage, the learner and the school, ed. by Douglas Barnes , James Britton , and Harold Rosen . 11–77.Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bellack, Arno A. , Herbert Kliebard , Ronald Hyman , and Frank Smith
    1966The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brookfield, Stephen
    2005The power of critical theory for adult learning and teaching. Berkshire: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fairclough, Norman
    1995Critical Discourse Analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2001Language and Power (2nd ed.). Harlow, U.K.: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Flanders, Ned A.
    1970Analyzing teaching behavior. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fisher, Ros and Shirley Larkin
    2008 “Pedagogy or ideological struggle? An examination of pupils’ and teachers’ expectations for talk in the classroom.” Language and Education22 (1): 1–16. doi: 10.2167/le706.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/le706.0 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fröhlich, Maria , Nina Spada , and Patrick Allen
    1985 “Differences in the communicative orientation of L2 classrooms.” TESOL Quarterly19 (1): 28–57. doi: 10.2307/3586771
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586771 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gee, James Paul
    1996The social linguistics and literacies: Ideology discourses. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 1999An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2004 “Discourse analysis: what makes it critical?” InAn introduction to critical discourse analysis in education, ed. by Rebecca Rogers . 19–50. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Giddens, Anthony
    1984The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hofstede, Geert
    2001Culture’s Consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Berkeley, Calif.: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hunt, Kellogg W.
    1970 “Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults.” Society for the Research in Child Development Monograph134 (1): 1–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumaravadivelu, B.
    1999 “Critical classroom discourse analysis.” TESOL Quarterly33(3): 453–84. doi: 10.2307/3587674
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587674 [Google Scholar]
  18. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Marcuse, Herbert
    1964One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Matusov, Eugene
    2007 “Applying Bakhtin scholarship on discourse in education: A critical review essay”. Educational Theory57(2): 215–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1741‑5446.2007.00253.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2007.00253.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Menard-Warwick, Julia
    2008 “Because she made beds every day: Social positioning, classroom discourse, and language learning.” Applied Linguistics29 (2): 267–89. doi: 10.1093/applin/amm053
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm053 [Google Scholar]
  22. Partington, Alan
    2004 “Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast.” InCorpora and discourse, ed. by Alan Partington , John Morley , and Louann Haarman , 11–20. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak
    2001Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sinclair, John and Malcolm Coulthard
    1975Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Dijk, Teun
    1998Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2001 “Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity”. InMethods of critical discourse analysisby Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer , 95–120. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9780857028020.d7
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.d7 [Google Scholar]
  27. Walsh, Steve
    2006Investigating classroom discourse. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wodak, Ruth
    2001 “What CDA is about – a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments.” InMethods of critical discourse analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer , 1–13. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error