1887
Volume 8, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper conceptualizes dictionary bilingualization as a recontextualizing practice and explores how ideology and power play out in the recontextualization of lexicographic discourse across languages and cultures to result in the transformation of meaning. It first proposes viewing the (bilingualized) dictionary as discourse and emphasizes bilingual lexicography as a site of an asymmetrical linguistic and cultural power dynamics. The paper then argues that a synergy of critical discourse analysis and postcolonial studies can reveal the inter-cultural ideological struggle implicit in the bilingualizing lexicographic practice. The body of the study is devoted to the analysis of those shifts taking place in the entries, definition, illustrative examples and pragmatic labels in a bilingualized English-Chinese dictionary, which, when viewed cumulatively, significantly reshape the ideological positioning of the dictionary. The paper discusses the implications for critical lexicographic studies and for research into the interplay between power and resistance between dominating and dominated cultures. It concludes that Periphery English dictionary compilers are able to negotiate the different subjectivities and ideologies inherent in dictionary making and to adopt a subject position favorable to their empowerment in the international English lexicography, although such resistance is far from capable of restructuring the order of lexicography.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.8.4.06che
2018-01-19
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Annoni, Marco
    2014 Culture, Power, Dictionaries: What Lexicography Reveals about Cultural Objects. Semiotica198: 261–269.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Béjoint, Henry
    1994Tradition and Innovation in Modern English Dictionaries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Benson, Phil
    2002Ethnocentrism and the English Dictionary. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, Douglas et al.
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brutt-Griffler, Janina
    2002World English: A Study of Its Development. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Burchfield, Robert
    1991Unlocking the English Language. New York: Hill and Wang.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Canagarajah, Suresh
    1999Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Wenge
    2015 Bilingual Lexicography as Recontextualization: A Case Study of Illustrative Examples in a New English–Chinese Dictionary. Australian Journal of Linguistics35(4):311–333. doi: 10.1080/07268602.2015.1067133
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2015.1067133 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2017 The Construction of the Lexicographer’s Identity in a Learner’s Dictionary: A Systemic Functional Perspective. International Journal of Lexicography30 (3): 322–349. doi: 10.1093/ijl/ecw011.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecw011 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chouliaraki, Lilie and Norman Fairclough
    1999Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Compiling Team of The History of PRC
    Compiling Team of The History of PRC 2013The History of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ezquerra, Manuel A.
    1995 Political Considerations on Spanish Dictionaries. In: Cultures, Ideologies and the Dictionary: Studies in Honor of Ladislav Zgusta, Braj B. Kachru and Henry Kahane (eds), 143–152. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110957075.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110957075.143 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fairclough, Norman
    1995Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak
    1997 Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Introduction to Discourse Analysis, Teun van Dijk (ed), 258–284. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fairclough, Norman
    1989Language and Power. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 1992Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fishman, Joshua A.
    1995 Dictionaries as Culturally Constructed and as Culture-Constructing Artifacts: The Reciprocity View as Seen From Yiddish Sources. In: Cultures, Ideologies and the Dictionary: Studies in Honor of Ladislav Zgusta, Braj B. Kachru and Henry Kahane (eds), 29–34. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110957075.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110957075.29 [Google Scholar]
  18. Flowerdew, John and Yongyan Li
    2009 English or Chinese? The Trade-Off Between Local and International Publication Among Chinese Academics in the Humanities and Social sciences. Journal of Second Language Writing18:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.09.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  19. Foucault, Michel
    1979Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1990The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. García, Ofelia and Ricardo Otheguy
    (eds) 1989English Across Cultures. Cultures Across English: A Reader in Cross-cultural Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110848328
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110848328 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hardy, Cynthia and Nelson Phillips
    2004 Discourse and Power. In: The Sage Handbook of Organizational Discourse, David Grant , Cynthia Hardy , Cliff Oswick and Linda Putnam (eds), 237–258. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781848608122.n14
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608122.n14 [Google Scholar]
  23. Harley, Brian
    1988 Maps, Knowledge and Power. In: The Iconography of Landscape, Denis Cosgrove and Stephen Daniels (eds), 277–312. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hanks, Patrick
    2000 Do Word Meanings Exist?Computers and the Humanities34(1–2): 205–215. doi: 10.1023/A:1002471322828
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002471322828 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hartmann, Reinhard and Gregory James
    1998Dictionary of Lexicography. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203159040
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203159040 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hennessy, Margaret
    1994 Propagating Half a Species: Gender in Learners’ Dictionaries. In: Exploring Gender: Questions and Implications for English Language Education, Jane Sunderland (ed), 104–111. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hodge, Robert and Gunther Kress
    1993Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hoey, Michael
    2001 A Clause-Relational Analysis of Selected Dictionary Entries: Contrast and Compatibility in the Definitions of ‘Man’ and ‘Woman’. In: Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard (eds), 178–190. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hornscheidt, Antje
    2008 A Concrete Research Agenda for Critical Lexicographic Research within Critical Discourse Studies: An Investigation into Racism/Colonialism in Monolingual Danish, German, and Swedish Dictionaries. Critical Discourse Studies, 5(2): 107–132. doi: 10.1080/17405900801990066
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900801990066 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2011 An Analysis of Post-Colonial Continuities in Danish Monolingual Dictionaries: Toward a Critical Postcolonial Linguistics. In: Postcolonial Linguistic Voices: Identity Choices and Representations, Eric Anchimbe and Stephen Mforteh (eds), 265–298. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110260694.265
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110260694.265 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jacob, G. P.
    1996 Coming to terms with imperialism: safeguarding local knowledge and experience in ELT curriculum development. Unpublished paper, Department of English, University of Pune, India; cited in Adrian Holliday 2005: The Struggle to Teach English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kachru, Braj B.
    1985 The Power and Politics of English. World Englishes, 5(2–3): 121–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kang, Ji-Hae
    2007 Recontextualization of News Discourse: A Case Study of Translation of News Discourse on North Korea. The Translator1(2): 219–242. doi: 10.1080/13556509.2007.10799239
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2007.10799239 [Google Scholar]
  34. Knights, David and Theo Vurdubakis
    1994 Foucault, Power, Resistance and All That. In: Resistance and Power in Organizations, John Jermier , David Knights , and Walter R. Nord (eds), 167–198. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kramsch, Klaire and Patricia Sullivan
    1996 Appropriate Pedagogy. ELT Journal50(3): 199–212. doi: 10.1093/elt/50.3.199
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.3.199 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kwon, Winston , Ian Clarke and Ruth Wodak
    2009 Organizational Decision-Making, Discourse, and Power: Integrating across Contexts and Scales. Discourse & Communication3(3): 273–302. doi: 10.1177/1750481309337208
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481309337208 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lefevere, André
    1992Translation, Rewriting, and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Liang, Dechao
    . The Nature of Falun Gong as Anti-society and Anti-government. Guangming Daily, May22 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. McEwan, Cheryl
    2008Postcolonialism and Development. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. McKay, Sandra
    2003 Toward an Appropriate EIL Pedagogy: Re-examining Common ELT Assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics13(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1111/1473‑4192.00035
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00035 [Google Scholar]
  41. Mayor, Michael
    1992 [1998] [2005]Longman Dictionary of English Language and Culture (English Edition). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2004 [2011]Longman Dictionary of English Language and Culture (English-Chinese Edition). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Moon, Rosamund
    1989 Objective or Objectionable: Ideological Aspects of Dictionaries, or the Subversive Dictionary. English Language Research3: 58–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2014 Meaning, Ideologies and Learners’ Dictionary. In: Proceedings of the XVI EURALEX International Congress: The User in Focus, Andrea Abel , Chiara Vettori and Natascia Ralli (eds), Bolzano/Bozen: Institute for Specialised Communication and Multilingualism.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Munday, Jeremy
    2007 Translation and Ideology: A Textual Approach. The Translator13(2): 195–217. doi: 10.1080/13556509.2007.10799238
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2007.10799238 [Google Scholar]
  46. Nasunbayar
    Nasunbayar 2010 Historical Evolution of Cult of Genghis Khan and Its Modern Situation. Journal of Minzu University of China2: 35–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Ogilvie, Sarah
    2013Words of the World: A Global History of the Oxford English Dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Orwell, George
    19491984. London: Secker & Warburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Pennycook, Alastair
    1998English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2001Critical Applied Linguistics: A Critical Introduction. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Phan, Le-Ha
    2008Teaching English as an International Language: Identity, Resistance and Negotiation. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Phillipson, Robert
    1992Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Reed, Mike
    1998 Organisational Analysis as Discourse Analysis: A Critique. In: Discourse and Organisation, David Grant , Cliff Oswick and Tom Keenoy (eds), 193–213. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781446280270.n12
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280270.n12 [Google Scholar]
  54. Said, Edward
    1978Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Seargeant, Philip
    2009The Idea of English in Japan: Ideology and the Evolution of a Global Language. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 2011 Lexicography as a Philosophy of Language. Language Sciences33:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2010.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  57. Shome, Raka
    1996 Postcolonial Interventions in the Rhetorical Canon: An ‘Other’ View. Communication Theory6: 40–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑2885.1996.tb00119.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00119.x [Google Scholar]
  58. Simpson, John and Edmund Weiner
    1989The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Sudan, Rajani
    1998 Lost in Lexicography: Legitimating Cultual Identity in Johnson’s ‘Preface’ to ‘The Dictionary’. The Eighteenth Century39(2): 127–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Thompson, John
    1990Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Theory in the Era of Mass Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1998 Opinions and Ideologies in the Press. In: Approaches to Media Discourse, Allan Bell and Peter Garrett (eds), 21–63. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Volosinov, Valentin N.
    1973Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Tranlated by Ladislav Matejka and Irwin Titunik . New York: Seminar Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Weedon, Chris
    1997Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Whitcut, Janet
    1984 Sexism in Dictionaries. In: LEXeter’ 83 Proceedings Papers from the International Conference on Lexicography at Exeter, Reinhard Hartmann (ed),141–144. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. doi: 10.1515/9783111593166‑020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111593166-020 [Google Scholar]
  65. Willinsky, John
    1994Empire of Words: The Reign of the OED. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. doi: 10.1515/9781400821358
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821358 [Google Scholar]
  66. Wodak, Ruth
    1989 Introduction. In: Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse, Ruth Wodak (ed), xiii–xix. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ct.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ct.7 [Google Scholar]
  67. Wodak, Ruth and Norman Fairclough
    2010 Recontextualizing European Higher Education Policies: The Cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies7(1): 19–40. doi: 10.1080/17405900903453922
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903453922 [Google Scholar]
  68. Yasukata, Yano
    2001 World Englishes in 2000 and Beyond. World Englishes20(2): 119–132. doi: 10.1111/1467‑971X.00204
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00204 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.8.4.06che
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): critical lexicography , dictionary bilingualization , ideology , lexicography , power and resistance
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error