1887
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper proposes a new way of analyzing the contrast between an ironic comment and the referent context by focusing on the structure of the dimension which the contrast belongs to. This new approach was stimulated by previous experimental studies demonstrating that dimensions are perceptually made up of two opposite poles and an intermediate region consisting either of point or range properties. Applying this schema it became clear that, on the one hand what previous evidence-based literature mostly focuses on is the idea that for an ironic meaning to be detected there must be a contrast two poles or a pole; on the other hand, that there is room for new investigations concerning whether it is possible to make ironic comments containing poles to refer to intermediate situations (i.e. situations perceived as ) or, vice versa, to make ironic comments containing intermediates to refer to polarized situations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00003.can
2018-05-31
2019-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akimoto, Y. , Miyazawa, S. , & Muramoto, T.
    (2012) Comprehension processes of verbal irony: The effects of salience, egocentric context and allocentric theory of mind. Metaphor & Symbol, 27(3), 217–242. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2012.691750
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2012.691750 [Google Scholar]
  2. Attardo, S.
    (2000) Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793–826. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00070‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2001) Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. In L. Anolli , R. Ciceri , & G. Riva (Eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication (pp.166–185). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barsalou, L. W.
    (2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2010) Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 716–724. doi: 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2010.01115.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergen, B. K.
    (2005) Mental simulation in literal and figurative language understanding. In S. Coulson & B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Eds.), The literal and nonliteral in language and thought (pp.255–280). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2012)  Louder than words . The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bianchi, I. , Burro, R. , Pezzola, R. , & Savardi, U.
    (2017) Matching visual and acoustic mirror forms. Symmetry, 9, 39–60. doi: 10.3390/sym9030039
    https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9030039 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bianchi, I. , Burro, R. , Torquati, S. , & Savardi, U.
    (2013) The middle of the road: Perceiving intermediates. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 121–135. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bianchi, I. , Canestrari, C. , Roncoroni, A. M. , Burro, R. , Branchini, E. , & Savardi, U.
    (2017) The effects of modulating contrast in verbal irony as a cue for giftedness. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 30(4), 383–415. doi: 10.1515/humor‑2017‑0028
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2017-0028 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bianchi, I. , Paradis, C. , Burro, R. , van de Weijer, J. , Nyström, M. , & Savardi, U.
    (2017) Identification of poles and intermediates by eye and by hand. Acta Psychologica, 180, 175–189. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.08.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.08.011 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bianchi, I. , & Savardi, U.
    (2008a) The perception of contraries. Rome: Aracne.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2008b) The relationship perceived between the real body and the mirror image. Perception, 5, 666–687. doi: org/10.1068/p5744
    https://doi.org/org/10.1068/p5744 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2009) Contrariety in plane mirror reflections. In U. Savardi (Ed.), The perception and cognition of contraries (pp.113–128). Milan: Mc-Graw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2012) The cognitive dimensions of contrariety. In J. Y. Bezieau & G. Payette (Eds.), The square of opposition: A general framework for cognition (pp.443–470). New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bianchi, I. , Savardi, U. , & Burro, R.
    (2011) Perceptual ratings of opposite spatial properties: Do they lie on the same dimension?. Acta Psychologica, 138(3), 405–418. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bianchi, I. , Savardi, U. , Burro, R. , & Martelli, M. F.
    (2014) Doing the opposite to what another person doing. Acta Psychologica, 151, 117–133. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bianchi, I. , Savardi, U. , Burro, R. , & Torquati, S.
    (2011) Negation and psychological dimensions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 275–301. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2011.493154
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.493154 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bianchi, I. , Savardi, U. , & Kubovy, M.
    (2011) Dimensions and their poles: A metric and topological approach to opposites. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(8), 1232–1265. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.520943
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.520943 [Google Scholar]
  20. Biederman, I.
    (1985) Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Understanding, 32(1), 29–73. doi: 10.1016/0734‑189X(85)90002‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-189X(85)90002-7 [Google Scholar]
  21. (1987) Recognition – by – components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 585–593.10.1037/0033‑295X.94.2.115
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115 [Google Scholar]
  22. Boucher, J. , & Osgood, C. E.
    (1969) The pollyanna hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(69)80002‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80002-2 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bressanelli, D. , & Parovel, G.
    (2012) The emotional effect of violation of causality, or how to make a square amusing. i-Perception, 3, 146–149. doi: 10.1068/i0465sas
    https://doi.org/10.1068/i0465sas [Google Scholar]
  24. Burgers, C. , & Beukeboom, C. J.
    (2016) Stereotype transmission and maintenance through interpersonal communication: The irony bias. Communication Research, 43(3), 414–441. doi: 10.1177/0093650214534975
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214534975 [Google Scholar]
  25. Caballero, R. , & Paradis, C.
    (2015) Making sense of sensory perceptions across languages and cultures. Functions of Language, 22(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1075/fol.22.1.01cab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.1.01cab [Google Scholar]
  26. Calmus, A. , & Caillies, S.
    (2014) Verbal irony processing: How do contrast and humour correlate?International Journal of Psychology, 49(1), 46–50. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12003
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Canestrari, C. , & Bianchi, I.
    (2009) The perception of humor: From script opposition to the phenomenological rules of contrariety. In U. Savardi (Ed.), The perception and cognition of contraries (pp.225–246). Milan: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2012) Perception of contrariety in jokes. Discourse Processes, 49(7), 539–564. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2012.710524
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.710524 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2013) From perception of contraries to humorous incongruities. In M. Dynel (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humour theory (pp.3–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2012.710524
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.710524 [Google Scholar]
  30. Canestrari, C. , Bianchi, I. , & Cori, V.
    (2018) De-polarizing verbal irony. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(1), 43–62. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2017.1368525
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2017.1368525 [Google Scholar]
  31. Canestrari, C. , Dionigi, A. , & Zuczkowski, A.
    (2014) Humor understanding and knowledge. Language and Dialogue, 4(1), 261–283. doi: 10.1075/ld.4.2.05can
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.2.05can [Google Scholar]
  32. Clark, H. , & Clark, E. V.
    (1977) Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Clark, H. H. , & Gerrig, R. J.
    (1984) On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 121–126. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.121
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121 [Google Scholar]
  34. Colston, H. L.
    (1997) I’ve never seen anything like it: Overstatement, understatement, irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(1), 43–58. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms1201_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1201_4 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2002) Contrast and assimilation in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 111–142. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)80008‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)80008-X [Google Scholar]
  36. Colston, H. L. , & Keller, S. B.
    (1998) You’ll never believe this: Irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(4), 499–513. doi: 10.1023/A:1023229304509
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023229304509 [Google Scholar]
  37. Colston, H. L. , & O’Brien, J.
    (2000a) Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: the pragmatic of accomplishments of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes, 30(2), 179–199. doi: 10.1207/S15326950DP3002_05
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3002_05 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2000b) Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language. Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(11), 1557–1583. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00110‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00110-1 [Google Scholar]
  39. Cori, V. , Canestrari, C. , & Bianchi, I.
    (2016) The perception of contrariety and the processing of verbal irony. Gestalt Theory, 38(2–3), 253–266.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Croft, W. , & Cruse, D. A.
    (2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  41. Cruse, D. A.
    (1986) Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Deckers, L.
    (1993) On the validity of weight-judging paradigm for the study of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 6(1), 43–56. doi: 10.1515/humr.1993.6.1.43
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1993.6.1.43 [Google Scholar]
  43. Dynel, M.
    (2013) Irony from a neo-Gricean perspective: On untruthfulness and evaluative implicature. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(3), 403–431. doi: 10.1515/ip‑2013‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0018 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2014) Isn’t it ironic? Defining the scope of humorous irony. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27(4), 619–639. doi: 10.1515/humor‑2014‑0096
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0096 [Google Scholar]
  45. Edelman, S. , & Bülthoff, H. H.
    (1992) Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three – dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32(12), 2385–2400. doi: 10.1016/0042‑6989(92)90102‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(92)90102-O [Google Scholar]
  46. Filik, R. , Leuthold, H. , Wallington, K. , & Page, J.
    (2014) Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition, 40(3), 811–828. doi: 10.1037/a0035658
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035658 [Google Scholar]
  47. Gerrig, R. J. , & Goldvarg, Y.
    (2000) Additive effects in the perception of sarcasm: Situational disparity and echoic mention. Metaphor and Symbol, 5(4), 197–208. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1504_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1504_1 [Google Scholar]
  48. Gibbs, R. W.
    (2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Giora, R.
    (1995) On Irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19(2), 239–264. doi: 10.1080/01638539509544916
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544916 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2003) On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  51. Giora, R. , Balaban, N. , Fein, O. , & Alkabets, I.
    (2004) Negation as positivity in disguise. In H. L. Colston & A. Katz (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp.233–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Giora, R. , & Fein, O.
    (1999) Irony: Context and salience. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(4), 241–257. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1404_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1404_1 [Google Scholar]
  53. Giora, R. , Fein, O. , Ganzi, J. , Levi, A. N. , & Sabah, H.
    (2005) On negation as mitigation: The case of negative irony. Discourse Processes, 39(1), 81–100. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp3901_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3901_3 [Google Scholar]
  54. Giora, R. , Fein, O. , & Schwartz, T.
    (1998) Irony: Graded salience and indirect negation. Metaphor and Symbol, 13(2), 83–101. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms1302_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1302_1 [Google Scholar]
  55. Giora, R. , Givoni, S. , & Fein, O.
    (2015) Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(4), 290–313. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2015.1074804
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1074804 [Google Scholar]
  56. Goldmeier, E.
    (1936/1972) Similarity in visually perceived forms. Psychological Issues, 29, Whole No.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Hancock, J. T. , Dunham, P. J. , & Purdy, K.
    (2000) Children’s comprehension of critical and complimentary forms of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition and Developments, 1(2), 227–248. doi: 10.1207/S15327647JCD010204
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD010204 [Google Scholar]
  58. Haverkate, H.
    (1990) A speech act analysis of irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(1), 77–109. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90065‑L
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90065-L [Google Scholar]
  59. Hempelmann, C. F. , & Attardo, S.
    (2011) Resolutions and their incongruities: Further thoughts on logical mechanisms. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 24(2), 125–149. doi: 10.1515/HUMR.2011.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2011.008 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ivanko, S. L. , & Pexman, P. M.
    (2003) Context incongruity and irony processing. Discourse Processes, 35(3), 241–279. doi: 10.1207/S15326950DP3503_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3503_2 [Google Scholar]
  61. Jones, S.
    (2002) Antonymy: A corpus-based perspective. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Jorgensen, J. , Miller, G. A. , & Sperber, D.
    (1984) Test of the mention theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 113(1), 112–120. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.112
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.112 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kowatch, K. , Whalen, J. M. , & Pexman, P. M.
    (2013) Irony comprehension in action: A new test of processing for verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 50(5), 301–315. doi: 0.1080/0163853X.2013.799934
    https://doi.org/0.1080/0163853X.2013.799934 [Google Scholar]
  64. Kreuz, R. J. , & Caucci, G. M.
    (2009) Social aspects of verbal irony use. In H. Pishwa (Ed.), Language and social cognition: Expression of the social mind (pp.325–348). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Kreuz, R. J. , & Glucksberg, S.
    (1989) How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(4), 374–386. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.118.4.374
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.4.374 [Google Scholar]
  66. Kreuz, R. J. , & Link, K. E.
    (2002) Asymmetries in the use of verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(2), 127–143. doi: 10.1177/02627X02021002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/02627X02021002002 [Google Scholar]
  67. Kumon-Nakamura, S. , Glucksberg, S. , & Brown, M.
    (1995) How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 124(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.124.1.3.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  68. Leggitt, J. S. , & Gibbs, R. W.
    (2000) Emotional reactions to verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 29(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1207/S15326950dp2901_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp2901_1 [Google Scholar]
  69. Lehrer, A. & Lehrer, K.
    (1982) Antonymy. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5(4), 483- doi: 10.1007/BF00355584
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355584 [Google Scholar]
  70. Lyons, J.
    (1977) Semantics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Maier, N. R. F.
    (1932) A Gestalt theory of humour. British Journal of Psychology, 23, 69–74. doi: 10.1111/j.2044‑8295.1932.tb00650.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1932.tb00650.x [Google Scholar]
  72. Marr, D.
    (1982) Vision. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Marr, D. , & Nishihara, H. K.
    (1978) Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three – dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 204, 301–328.10.1098/rspb.1979.0029
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0029 [Google Scholar]
  74. Medin, D. L. , Goldstone, R. L. , & Gentner, D.
    (1990) Similarity involving attributes and relations: judgments of similarity and difference are not inverses. Psychological Science, 1, 64–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.1990.tb00069.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00069.x [Google Scholar]
  75. Metz-Göckel, H.
    (1989) Witzstrukturen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.10.1007/978‑3‑322‑93823‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93823-7 [Google Scholar]
  76. (2008) Closure as a joke-principle. Gestalt Theory, 30(3), 331–336.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Muehleisen, V.
    (1997) Antonymy and semantic range in English. Doctoral dissertation in philosophy, field of linguistics. Evanston, Illinois
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Myers, A. R.
    (1977) Towards a definition of irony. In R. W. Fasold & R. Shuy (Eds.), Studies in language variation (pp.171–183). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Nerhardt, G.
    (1970) Humor and inclination to laugh: Emotional reactions to stimuli of different divergence from a range of expectancy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 185–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9450.1970.tb00734.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1970.tb00734.x [Google Scholar]
  80. (1976) Incongruity and funniness: Towards a new descriptive model. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), Humour and laughter: Theory, research and applications (pp.55–62). London: Transaction Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Okamoto, S.
    (2006) Perception of hiniku and oseji: How hyperbole and orthographically deviant styles influence irony-related perceptions in the Japanese language. Discourse Processes, 41(1), 25–50. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp4101_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4101_3 [Google Scholar]
  82. Osmańska-Lipka, I.
    (2012) Elements of Gestalt psychology in American cognitive linguistics. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie – Skłodowska Lublin –, 30(2), 47–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Palmer, S. E.
    (1978) Structural aspects of visual similarity. Memory & Cognition, 6(2), 91–97. doi: 10.3758/BF03197433
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197433 [Google Scholar]
  84. Paradis, C.
    (2008) Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of DEGREE. English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 317–343. doi: 10.1017/S1360674308002645
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674308002645 [Google Scholar]
  85. Paradis, C. , & Willners, C.
    (2006) Antonyms and negation: the boundedness hypothesis. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(7), 1051–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  86. (2013) Negation and approximation as configuration construal in SPACE. In C. Paradis , J. Hudson & U. Magnusson (Eds.), The construal of spatial meaning: Windows into conceptual space (pp.287–311). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641635.003.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641635.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
  87. Paradis, C. , Willners, C. , & Jones, S.
    (2009) Good versus bad antonyms: using textual and experimental methods to measure canonicity. The Mental Lexicon, 4(3), 380–429. doi: 10.1075/ml.4.3.04par.
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.4.3.04par [Google Scholar]
  88. Parovel, G. , & Guidi, S.
    (2015) The psychophysics of comic: Effects of incongruity in causality and animacy. Acta Psychologica, 159, 22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  89. Pecher, D. , & Zwaan, R. A.
    (2005) Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511499968
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499968 [Google Scholar]
  90. Pexman, P. M. , & Olineck, K. M.
    (2002) Understanding irony how do stereotypes cue speaker intent. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 245–279. doi: 10.1177/0261927X02021003003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X02021003003 [Google Scholar]
  91. Roberts, R. M. , & Kreuz, R. J.
    (1994) Why do people use figurative language?Psychological Science, 5(3), 159–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.1994.tb00653.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00653.x [Google Scholar]
  92. Rock, I.
    (1973) Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Russell, R. E.
    (1996) Understanding laughter in terms of basic perceptual and response patterns. Humor. International Journal of Humor Research, 9(1), 39–55. doi: 10.1515/humr.1996.9.1.39
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1996.9.1.39 [Google Scholar]
  94. Savardi, U. , & Bianchi, I.
    (2009) The spatial path to contrariety. In U. Savardi (Ed.), The perception and cognition of contraries (pp.63–92). Milan: Mc-Graw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Savardi, U. , Bianchi, I. , & Burro, R.
    (2009) From opposites to dimensions: filling in the gaps. In U. Savardi (Ed.), The perception and cognition of contraries (pp.275–294). Milan: Mc-Graw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Schiller, P.
    (1938) A configurational theory of jokes and puzzles, The Journal of General Psychology, 18, 217–234. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1938.9709976
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1938.9709976 [Google Scholar]
  97. Schwoebel, J. , Dews, S. , Winner, E. , & Srinivas, K.
    (2000) Obligatory processing of the literal meaning of ironic utterances: Further evidence. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 47–61. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2000.9678864
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2000.9678864 [Google Scholar]
  98. Smith, K.
    (1996) Laughing at the way we see: The role of visual organization principles in cartoon humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 9(1), 19–38. doi: 10.1515/humr.1996.9.1.19
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1996.9.1.19 [Google Scholar]
  99. Talmy, L.
    (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Tarr, M. J. , & Pinker, S.
    (1989) Mental rotation and orientation – dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21 (2), 233–282. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0285(89)90009‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90009-1 [Google Scholar]
  101. Tversky, A.
    (1977) Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84(4), 327–352. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.84.4.327
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327 [Google Scholar]
  102. Utsumi, A.
    (2000) Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonironic. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12), 1777–1806. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00116‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00116-2 [Google Scholar]
  103. (2004) Stylistic and contextual effects in irony processing. In K. Forbus , D. Gentner , & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-six annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp.1369–1374). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Veale, T.
    (2008) Figure-ground duality in humour: A multi-modal perspective. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4(1), 63–81. doi: 10.2478/v10016‑008‑0009‑z
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0009-z [Google Scholar]
  105. Viana, A.
    (2010) Asymmetry in script opposition. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 23(4), 505–526. doi: 10.1515/humr.2010.023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2010.023 [Google Scholar]
  106. van de Weijer, J. , Paradis, C. , Willners, C. , & Lindgren, M.
    (2014) Antonym canonicity: Temporal and contextual manipulations. Brain and Language, 128(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.10.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.10.011 [Google Scholar]
  107. Willners, C. , & Paradis, C.
    (2006) Antonymy and negation: The boundedness hypothesis. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(7), 1051–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  108. Wilson, D.
    (2013) Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 40–56. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.016 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00003.can
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00003.can
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): contrast , irony and perceptual opposites
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error