On metaphorical views, dynamite, and doodlings

References

1. Beger, A.
   (2011) Deliberate metaphors?: An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American College lectures. Metaphorik.de, 20, 39–60.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
   (1999) The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cameron, L.
   (1999) Operationalising ‘metaphor’ for applied linguistic research. InL. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp.3–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524704.004
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524704.004 [Google Scholar]
4. Cameron, L.
   (2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Crisp, P., Heywood, J., & Steen, G. J.
   (2002) Metaphor identification and analysis, classification and quantification. Language and Literature, 11(1), 55–69. doi:  10.1177/096394700201100105
   https://doi.org/10.1177/096394700201100105 [Google Scholar]
6. Dorst, A. G., & Reijnierse, W. G.
   (2015) A dictionary gives definitions, not decisions: On using a dictionary to identify the basic senses of words. Metaphor and the Social World, 5(1), 137–144. doi:  10.1075/msw.5.1.08dor
   https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.1.08dor [Google Scholar]
7. Ernst, T.
   (1981) Grist for the linguistic mill: Idioms and “extra” adjectives. Journal of Linguistic Research, 1(3), 51–68.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ernst, T.
   (2001) The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486258
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486258 [Google Scholar]
9. Gibbs, R. W.
   (2015a) Do pragmatic signals affect conventional metaphor understanding?: A failed test of deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 77–87. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.021
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.021 [Google Scholar]
10. Gibbs, R. W.
    (2015b) Does deliberate metaphor theory have a future?Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 73–76. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.016 [Google Scholar]
11. Goatly, A.
    (1997) The language of metaphors. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203210000
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203210000 [Google Scholar]
12. Hanks, P.
    (2004) The syntagmatics of metaphor and idiom. International Journal of Lexicography, 17(3), 245–274. doi:  10.1093/ijl/17.3.245
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/17.3.245 [Google Scholar]
13. Hertzberger, R.
    (2013) Economen hebben geen flauw benul [Economists haven’t got a clue]. NRC Handelsblad, March2. Retrieved from: www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2013/03/02/economen-hebben-geen-flauw-benul-12624625-a728936.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Krennmayr, T.
    (2011) Metaphors in newspapers. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G.
    (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:  10.2307/2529310
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
17. Langlotz, A.
    (2006) Idiomatic creativity: A cognitive-linguistic model of idiom-representation and idiom-variation in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.17 [Google Scholar]
18. Macmillan English Dictionary Online
    Macmillan English Dictionary Online. July 2016 www.macmillandictionary.com/
19. Moshinsky, B.
    (2016) Get ready for an economic crash if Britain leaves the EU. Business Insider UK, May23. Retrieved from: uk.businessinsider.com/uk-treasury-report-on-brexit-2016-5.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Musolff, A.
    (2004) Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230504516
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
21. Nacey, S.
    (2013) Metaphors in learner English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.2 [Google Scholar]
22. Pasma, T.
    (2011) Metaphor and register variation: The personalisation of Dutch news discourse. Oisterwijk: Box Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M.
    (2014) Deliberate metaphors in political discourse: The case of citizen discourse. Metaphorik.de, 25, 7–41.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. doi:  10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
25. Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G. J.
    (2018) DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics, 2(2), 129–147. doi:  10.1007/s41701‑017‑0026‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-017-0026-7 [Google Scholar]
26. Semino, E.
    (2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Semino, E., Heywood, J., & Short, M.
    (2004) Methodological problems in the analysis of metaphors in a corpus of conversations about cancer. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1271–1294. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.013 [Google Scholar]
28. Steen, G. J.
    (2007) Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.10 [Google Scholar]
29. Steen, G. J.
    (2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. doi:  10.1080/10926480802426753
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753 [Google Scholar]
30. Steen, G. J.
    (2011a) From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik.de, 21, 83–110.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Steen, G. J.
    (2011b) The contemporary theory of metaphor: Now new and improved!Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64. doi:  10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste [Google Scholar]
32. Steen, G. J.
    (2015) Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013 [Google Scholar]
33. Steen, G. J.
    (2016) Mixed metaphor is a question of deliberateness. InR. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp.113–132). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Steen, G. J.
    (2017) Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics14(1), 1–24. doi:  10.1515/ip‑2017‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0001 [Google Scholar]
35. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
36. Sullivan, K.
    (2013) Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.14 [Google Scholar]
37. Sweetser, E.
    (1999) Compositionality and blending: Semantic composition in a cognitively realistic framework. InT. Janssen & G. Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope and methodology (pp.129–162). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110803464.129
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803464.129 [Google Scholar]
38. Thibodeau, P. H.
    (2017) The function of metaphor framing, deliberate or otherwise, in a social world. Metaphor and the Social World, 7(2), 270–290. 10.1075/msw.7.2.06thi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.7.2.06thi [Google Scholar]
39. Turner, M.
    (1991) Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]