1887
Volume 16, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Evidentiality revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives

 

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00020.cel
2018-11-05
2024-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, A.
    (2004) Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (2014) The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. InA. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic typology (pp.1–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boye, K.
    (2012) Epistemic meaning: A crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219036
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219036 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boye, K., & Harder, P.
    (2009) Evidentiality: Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language, 16, 9–43. 10.1075/fol.16.1.03boy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.03boy [Google Scholar]
  5. Celle, A.
    (2009a) Hearsay adverbs and modality. InR. Salkie, P. Busuttil, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), Modality in English: Theory and description (pp.269–293). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110213331.269
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213331.269 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2009b) The intersubjective function of modal adverbs: A contrastive English-French study of adverbs in journalistic discourse. Languages in Contrast, 9(1), 23–36. 10.1075/lic.9.1.03cel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.9.1.03cel [Google Scholar]
  7. Chafe, W., & Nichols, J.
    (Eds.) (1986) Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. de Haan, F.
    (1999) Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18, 83–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E.
    (Eds.) (2010) Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110223972
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223972 [Google Scholar]
  10. Du Bois, J.
    (2007) The stance triangle. InR. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse (pp.139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  11. Guentchéva, Z.
    (Ed.) (1996) L’énonciation médiatisée. Louvain: Editions Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Korotkova, N.
    (2016) Heterogeneity and uniformity in the evidential domain. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mushin, I.
    (2012) ‘Watching for witness’ evidential strategies and epistemic authority in Garrwa conversation. Pragmatics and Society, 3(2), 270–293. 10.1075/ps.3.2.07mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.3.2.07mus [Google Scholar]
  14. Palmer, F.
    (1986) Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V.
    (1998) Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2, 79–124. 10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79 [Google Scholar]
  16. von Fintel, K., & Gillies, A. S.
    (2010) Must … stay … strong!Natural Language Semantics, 18(4), 351–383. 10.1007/s11050‑010‑9058‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-010-9058-2 [Google Scholar]
  17. Willett, T.
    (1988) A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12(1), 51–97. 10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00020.cel
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error