M. Prandi. Conceptual conflicts in metaphors and figurative language

References

1. Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
   (2014) Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Goddard, C.
   (2004) The ethnopragmatics and semantics of ‘active metaphors’. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1211–1230. 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.011
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.011 [Google Scholar]
3. Krenmayr, T.
   (2012) How linguists manipulate metaphors. Metaphor and the Social World, 2(1), 115–120. 10.1075/msw.2.1.06kre
   https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.2.1.06kre [Google Scholar]
4. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
   (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Le Guern, M.
   (1973) Sémantique de la métaphore et de la métonymie. Paris: Larousse.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Prandi, M.
   (1992) Grammaire philosophique des tropes. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Prandi, M.
   (2004) The building blocks of meaning ideas for a philosophical grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.13
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.13 [Google Scholar]
8. Prandi, M., & de Santis, C.
   (2011) Le regole e le scelte: Manuale di linguistica e di grammatica italiana. Novara: De Agostini.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Richards, I. A.
   (1936) The philosophy of rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ricoeur, P.
    (1975) La métaphore vive. Paris: Éd. du Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Steen, G.J.
    (2015) Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013 [Google Scholar]
12. Steen, G.J.
    (2017) Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. 10.1515/ip‑2017‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0001 [Google Scholar]