Massive corpora and models of cross‑cultural communication styles in Cognitive Linguitics

References

1. Croft, W.
   (2009) Toward a social cognitive linguistics. InV. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive science (pp.395–420). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.24.25cro
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.24.25cro [Google Scholar]
2. Cuyckens, H., & De Smet, H.
   (2007) For…to-infinitives from Early to Late Modern English. InJ. Pérez-Guerra, D. González-Álvarez, J. L. Bueno-Alonso, & E. Rama-Martínez (Eds.), ‘Of varying language and opposing creed’: New insights into Late Modern English (pp.77–102). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Davies, M.
   (2012) Expanding horizons in historical linguistics with the 400-million word Corpus of Historical American English. Corpora, 7(2), 121–157. 10.3366/cor.2012.0024
   https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2012.0024 [Google Scholar]
4. Davies, M.
   (2013) Recent shifts with three non-finite verbal complements in English: Data from the 100-million-word Time corpus (1920s–2000s). InB. Aarts, J. Close, G. Leech, & S. Wallis (Eds.), The verb phrase in English: Investigating recent language change with corpora (pp.46–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139060998.004
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060998.004 [Google Scholar]
5. Davies, M., & Fuchs, R.
   (2015) Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9-billion-word Global Web-based English Corpus (GloWbE). English World-Wide, 36(1), 1–28. 10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav
   https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav [Google Scholar]
6. De Smet, H.
   (2007) For…to-infinitives as verbal complements in Late Modern and Present-Day English: Between motivation and change. English Studies, 88, 67–94. 10.1080/00138380601042766
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00138380601042766 [Google Scholar]
7. Fanego, T.
   (2007) Drift and the development of sentential complements in British and American English from 1700 to the present day. Linguistic Insights: Studies in Language and Communication, 28, 161–235.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fischer, O.
   (2000) Grammaticalisation: unidirectional, non-reversible?: The case of to before the infinitive in English. InO. Fischer, A. Rosenbach, & D. Stein (Eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English (pp.149–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.53.08fis
   https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.08fis [Google Scholar]
9. Geeraerts, D., & Kristiansen, G.
   (2014) Cognitive Linguistics and language variation. InJ. Littlemore & J. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to Cognitive Linguistics (pp.202–217). London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Goldberg, A.
    (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gries, S. T.
    (2001) A multifactorial analysis of syntactic variation: Particle movement revisited. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 8, 33–50. 10.1076/jqul.8.1.33.4092
    https://doi.org/10.1076/jqul.8.1.33.4092 [Google Scholar]
12. Gries, S. T.
    (2002) The influence of processing on grammatical variation: Particle placement in English. InN. Dehé, R. Jackendoff, A. McIntyre, & S. Urban (Eds.), Verb-particle explorations (pp.269–288). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110902341.269
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110902341.269 [Google Scholar]
13. Gries, S. T.
    (2003) Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. London/New York: Continuum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2004) Co-varying collexemes in the into-causative. InM. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture and mind (pp.225–36). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Grondelaers, S.
    (2008) National variation in the use of er ‘there’: Regional and diachronic constraints on cognitive explanations. InG. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems (pp.153–203). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199154.2.153
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199154.2.153 [Google Scholar]
16. Hall, E.
    (1976) Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hilpert, M.
    (2014) Corpus-based approaches to constructional change. InT. Hoffman & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp.457–475). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hofstede, G.
    (1980) Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hofstede, G.
    (1991) Cultures and organizations. Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hollmann, W. B.
    (2013) Constructions in cognitive sociolinguistics. InT. Hoffman & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp.491–509). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.
    (2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
22. Ivorra Pérez, F. M.
    (2014) Cultural values and digital discourse: An intercultural communication approach to the transactional discourse of Spanish and US sales websites. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 36, 50–76.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lewis, R. D.
    (2005) Finland, cultural lone wolf. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lewis, R. D.
    (2006) [1996] When cultures collide: Managing successfully across cultures (revised edition.) London: Nicholas Brealey.
    [Google Scholar]
26. McFadden, T.
    (2008) Overt subjects of infinitives and for-to in the history of English. Paper presented at the10th Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference. Cornell University, 7 August 2008. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/2849136/Overt_subjects_of_infinitives_and_for-to_in_the_history_of_English?auto=downloadinAugust 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Nishimura, S., Nevgi, A., & Tella, S.
    (2008) Communication style and cultural features in high/low context communication cultures: A case study of Finland, Japan and India. InA. Kallioniemi (Ed.), Renovating and developing subject didactics: Proceedings of a subject-didactic symposium in Helsinki on Feb. 2, 2008 (pp.783–796). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Piller, I.
    (2007) Linguistics and intercultural communication. Language and Linguistic Compass, 1(3), 208–226. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00012.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00012.x [Google Scholar]
29. Prykarpatska, I.
    (2008) Why are you late?: Cross-cultural pragmatic study of complaints in American English and Ukrainian. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 21, 87–102. 10.14198/raei.2008.21.05
    https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2008.21.05 [Google Scholar]
30. Radford, A.
    (2004) English syntax: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511841675
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841675 [Google Scholar]
31. Uhrig, P.
    (2015) Why the principle of no synonymy is overrated. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 63(3), 323–337. 10.1515/zaa‑2015‑0030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2015-0030 [Google Scholar]
32. Wagner, S.
    (2000) Depends how long you want for it to take: For/to clauses in present-day spoken British English. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 25(2), 191–211.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Wierzbicka, A.
    (1988) The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.18 [Google Scholar]
34. Wierzbicka, A.
    (2003) Cross-cultural pragmatics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110220964
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220964 [Google Scholar]
35. Wulff, S., Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T.
    (2007) Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: Variety-specific meaning construction in the into-causative. InG. Radden, K. M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction in lexicon and grammar (pp.265–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.136.17wul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.17wul [Google Scholar]