APO X, Y

References

1. Bortone, P.
   (2010) Greek prepositions: From antiquity to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556854.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556854.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Dancygier, B., & Vandelanotte, L.
   (2009) Judging distances: Mental spaces, distance, and viewpoint in literary discourse. InG. Brône & J. Vandaele (Eds.), Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains and gaps (pp.319–369). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dik, S. C.
   (1997a) [Hengeveld, K. (Ed.)] The theory of Functional Grammar. Part1: The structure of the clause. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dik, S. C.
   (1997b) [Hengeveld, K. (Ed.)]. The theory of Functional Grammar. Part2: Complex and derived constructions. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110218374
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218374 [Google Scholar]
5. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
   (2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Goldberg, A.
   (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Goldberg, A.
   (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Grady, J.
   (1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. InR. W. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp.79–100). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.175.06gra
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.06gra [Google Scholar]
9. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
   (2004) An introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd revised edition). London: Edward Arnold.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hengeveld, K., & Mackenzie, L.
    (2008) Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
11. Herring, S. C.
    (2001) Computer-mediated discourse. InD. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp.612–634). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Katis, D., & Nikiforidou, K.
    (2017) Spatial prepositions in early child Greek: Implications for acquisition, polysemy and historical change. InProceedings of the 12th ICGL (pp.525–537).
    [Google Scholar]
13. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
14. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol.1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Langacker, R. W.
    (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol.2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Langacker, R. W.
    (1993) Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 1–38. 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1 [Google Scholar]
17. Langacker, R. W.
    (2001) Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 143–188. 10.1515/cogl.12.2.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143 [Google Scholar]
18. Langacker, R. W.
    (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
19. McCracken, H.
    (2009) What I know about Twitter. Available at: technologizer.com/2009/03/15/what-i-know-about-twitter/
20. Mairal, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
    (2009) Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. InC. Butler & J. Martín Arista (Eds.), Deconstructing constructions (pp.153–198). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.107.08lev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.107.08lev [Google Scholar]
21. Nikiforidou, K.
    (1991) The meanings of the genitive: A case study in semantic structure and semantic change. Cognitive Linguistics, 2(2), 149–205. 10.1515/cogl.1991.2.2.149
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1991.2.2.149 [Google Scholar]
22. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
    (2002) From semantic underdetermination, via metaphor and metonymy to conceptual interaction. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum: An International Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(6), 107–143.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
    (2013) Meaning construction, meaning interpretation and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model. InB. Nolan & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Linking constructions into functional linguistics (pp.231–270). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.145.09ib225
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.145.09ib225 [Google Scholar]
24. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
    (2014) On the nature and scope of metonymy in linguistic description and explanation: towards settling some controversies. InJ. Littlemore & J. Taylor (Eds.), Bloomsbury companion to Cognitive Linguistics (pp.143–166). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
    (2017) Metaphor and other cognitive operations in interaction: From basicity to complexity. InB. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition, and discourse (pp.138–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A.
    (2014) Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.45 [Google Scholar]
27. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Mairal, R.
    (2008) Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: An introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Linguistica, 42(2), 355–400.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Mairal, R.
    (2011) Constraints on syntactic alternation: Lexical-constructional subsumption in the Lexical Constructional Model. InP. Guerrero (Ed.), Morphosyntactic alternations in English: Functional and cognitive perspectives (pp.62–82). London, UK/Oakville, CT: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Skopeteas, S.
    (1999) NE sisxetistes tou topou me tis kiries prothesis se kai apo. InA. Mozer (Ed.), Greek Linguistics ’97: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Greek Linguistics (pp.249–57). Athens: Ellinika Grammata.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
    (1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Tachibana, T.
    (1994) Spatial expressions in Modern Greek. Studies in Greek Linguistics, 14, 525–39.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Talmy, L.
    (1988) The relation of grammar to cognition. InB. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics (pp.165–205). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.50.08tal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.50.08tal [Google Scholar]
33. Tzartzanos, A.
    (1991) Neoelliniki sintaxis (tis kinis dimotikis). Thessaloniki: Kyriakides.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Vandelanotte, L.
    (2012) “Wait till you get started”: How to submerge another’s discourse in your own. InB. Dancygier & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint In language: A multimodal perspective (pp.198–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084727.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084727.015 [Google Scholar]
35. Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
    (2012) Explaining irony. InD. Wilson, & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp.123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008 [Google Scholar]
36. Zafeiriadou, K.
    (2010) Εvent Structure: An instantiation with Από. PhD dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
37. Zappavigna, M.
    (2011) Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. Journal of New Media and Society, 13(5), 788–806. 10.1177/1461444810385097
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097 [Google Scholar]
38. Zappavigna, M.
    (2012) Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. London/New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]