Conceptual metaphors and performativity in the Sunshine Policy

References

1. Butler, J.
   (1988) Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531. 10.2307/3207893
   https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893 [Google Scholar]
2. Deignan, A., & Armstrong, S.
   (2015) Payback and punishment. InJ. B. Herrmann & T. B. Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor in specialist discourse (pp.79–100). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.4.04dei
   https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.4.04dei [Google Scholar]
3. de Man, P.
   (1996) The concept of irony. InA. Warminski (Ed.), Aesthetic ideology (pp.163–184). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Derrida, J.
   (2002) Without alibi. Trans. byP. Kamuf. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Feldman, J.
   (2006) From molecule to metaphor: A neural theory of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3135.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3135.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
6. Fish, S. E.
   (1976) How to do things with Austin and Searle: Speech act theory and literary criticism. Modern Language Notes, 91, 983–1025.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G.
   (2005) The brain’s concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3), 455–479.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Lakoff, G.
   (1991) Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Paper presented at theAlumni House on the campus of the University of California at Berkeley, January 30.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lakoff, G.
   (1996) Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Lakoff, G.
    (2006a) Thinking points: Communicating our American values and vision. New York: Tides Center/Rockridge Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Lakoff, G.
    (2006b) Whose freedom?: The battle over America’s most important idea. New York: Picador.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Lakoff, G.
    (2006c) [1993] The contemporary theory of metaphor. InD. Geeraerts, (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic readings (pp.185–238). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199901.185
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.185 [Google Scholar]
13. Lakoff, G.
    (2008a) The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st-century American politics with an 18th-century brain. New York: Viking Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lakoff, G.
    (2008b) The neural theory of metaphor. InR. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.17–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.003 [Google Scholar]
15. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R.
    (2000) Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Moon, C. I.
    (2002) The Sunshine Policy and the Korean summit: Assessments and prospects. InT. Akaha (Ed.), The future of North Korea (pp.26–46). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Schwartz, A.
    (1992) Contested concepts in cognitive social science. Unpublished thesis. Berkeley: University of California.
19. Searle, J.
    (1989) How performatives work. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 535–558. 10.1007/BF00627773
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627773 [Google Scholar]
20. Sullivan, K.
    (2013) Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.14 [Google Scholar]
21. Sweetser, E.
    (2000) Blended spaces and performativity. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3), 305–333.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Todd, Z., & Low, G.
    (2010) A selective survey of research practive in published studies using metaphor analysis. InL. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and humanities (pp.26–41). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]