Volume 18, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



What causes metaphors to be similar or different across languages? It can be tempting to associate differences with culture and similarities with embodiment, since human cultures are diverse and human bodies are comparable. However, we argue that the death of a loved one is such a widespread experience that it forms part of every human culture. We argue that linguistic instantiations of tend to focus on the starting point of the deceased person’s journey and the arrival of the person’s remains in their final resting place. We attribute these trends to the fact that living people around the world are focused on their loved ones’ absence in the here-and-now, and living people often place importance on physical sites associated with deceased loved ones, such as the location of their remains. These cross-linguistic trends emphasize that culture can lead to similarities as well as differences in metaphoric structures.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adair, L.
    (2015) The D.C. connection. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biela-Wołońciej, A.
    (2013) “Death is -the essence of all evil” – but not equally everywhere: Polish-English study on valuing and masking. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(2), 235–264. 10.1515/ip‑2013‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0011 [Google Scholar]
  3. Berndt, R. M., & Berndt, C. H.
    (1964) The world of the first Australians. Sydney: Ure Smith.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dąbrowska, A.
    (1998) Słownik eufemizmów polskich: Czyli w rzeczy mocno, w sposobie łagodnie. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN SA.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwards, B.
    (2013) Changes in Pitjantjatjara mourning and burial practices. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 1, 31–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
    (2002) The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fauconnier, G.
    (1997) Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139174220
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174220 [Google Scholar]
  8. Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
    (2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & Colston, H. L.
    (1995) The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 347–378. 10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.347
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.347 [Google Scholar]
  10. Grady, J. E.
    (1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. PhD Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley: Department of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Grady, J. E., & Johnson, C.
    (2002) Converging evidence for the notions of subscene and primary scene. InR. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp.533–554). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219197.533
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.533 [Google Scholar]
  12. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S.
    (1986) The causes and consequences of the need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. InR. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp.189–212). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑1‑4613‑9564‑5_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9564-5_10 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
    (2013) The relationship between conceptual metaphor and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(2), 315–339. 10.1515/ip‑2013‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0014 [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson, M.
    (1993) Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226223230.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226223230.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaberry, P. M.
    (1939) Aboriginal woman sacred and profane. London: G. Routledge and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kövecses, Z.
    (2005) Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
    (1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Pound, L.
    (1936) American euphemisms for dying, death, and burial: An anthology. American Speech, 11(3), 195–202. 10.2307/452239
    https://doi.org/10.2307/452239 [Google Scholar]
  21. Quinn, N.
    (1991) The cultural basis of metaphor. InJ. Fernandez (Ed.), Beyond metaphor. The theory of tropes in anthropology (pp.56–93). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Thomas, D.
    (1952) The Poems of Dylan Thomas. New York: New Directions Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tu, B. D., & Wang, G. N.
    (2013) A comparative study on “death” terms in Chinese and Vietnamese. InP. Liu & Q. Su (Eds.), Chinese lexical semantics 14th workshop, CLSW 2013 (pp.117–125). Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Wachowski, W.
    (2017) Metonymic hiding and cross-cultural communication. InW. Wachowski, Z. Kövecses, & M. B. Zooming (Eds), Micro-scale perspectives on cognition, translation and cross-cultural communication (pp.33–53). Oxford: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2018) Towards a better understanding of metonymy. Oxford: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Whittier, J. G.
    (1866) Snow-bound: A winter idyl. Boston, MA: Ticknor & Fields.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): blending; conceptual integration; cultural filter; death; embodiment; primary metaphor
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error