Arbitrariness, motivation and idioms

References

1. Al-Jarf, R.
   (1994) English and Arabic word-formation processes. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Reima_Al-Jarf/publication/281003183_English_and_Arabic_Word-formation_Processes_for_Translation_Students/links/5873aa6708ae6eb871c64fe2/English-and-Arabic-Word-formation-Processes-for-Translation-Students.pdfaccessed19 Dec 2017
2. Baldi, P.
   (2000) Creative processes. InG. Booij, C. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphologie/Morphology (pp.963–972). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bauer, L.
   (1983) English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165846
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165846 [Google Scholar]
4. Bauer, L.
   (2001) Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486210
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486210 [Google Scholar]
5. Bauer, L.
   (2006) Compounds and minor word-formation types. InB. Arts & A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp.483–506). Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470753002.ch21
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch21 [Google Scholar]
6. Bybee, J.
   (1985) Morphology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
7. Campbell, L.
   (1998) Historical linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Casenhiser, D. M.
   (2005) Children’s resistance to homonymy: an experimental study of pseudohomonyms. Journal of Child Language32, 319–343. 10.1017/S0305000904006749
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000904006749 [Google Scholar]
9. Clark, E. V.
   (1983) The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cuyckens, Hu, Berg, T., & Dirven, R.
    (Eds.) (2003) Motivation in language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.243
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.243 [Google Scholar]
11. Di Sciullo, A. M., & Williams, E.
    (1987) On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Doherty, M. J.
    (2004) Children’s difficulty in learning homonyms. Journal of Child Language31, 203–214. 10.1017/S030500090300583X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090300583X [Google Scholar]
13. Dressler, W. U.
    (2005) Word-formation in natural morphology. InP. Štekauer & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (pp.267–284). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3596‑9_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_11 [Google Scholar]
14. Firth, J. R.
    (1930) Speech. InJ. R. Firth, The tongues of men and speech 1964 London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fleischer, W.
    (2000) Die Klassifiktion von Wortbildungsprozessen. InG. Booij, C. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphologie/Morphology (pp.886–897). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gilliéron, J., & Roques, M.
    (1910) Études de géographie linguistique XII. Mots en collision. A: Le coq et le chat. Revue de Philologie Française24, 278–288.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Grant, L., & Bauer, L.
    (2004) Criteria for redefining idioms. Applied Linguistics, 25, 38–61. 10.1093/applin/25.1.38
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.38 [Google Scholar]
18. Hinzen, W., Machery, E., & Werning, M.
    (Eds.) (2012) The Oxford handbook of compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
19. Julie, L.
    (n.d.). https://www.slideshare.net/LindaJulie/word-forming-proccess-coinageaccessed19 Dec 2017
20. Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Fischer, J.
    (2004) Word learning in a domestic dog evidence for ‘fast mapping’. Science, 304, 1682–1683. 10.1126/science.1097859
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097859 [Google Scholar]
21. Labov, W.
    (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lightfoot, D.
    (1979) Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lipka, L.
    (1994) Lexicalization and institutionalization. InR. E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol.4 (pp.2164–2167). Oxford: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lyons, J.
    (1977) Semantics. 2vols.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Marchand, H.
    (1969) The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. 2nd edition. Munich: Beck.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Mazzacocco, M. M.
    (1997) Children’s interpretations of homonyms: a developmental study. Journal of Child Language, 24, 441–467. 10.1017/S0305000997003103
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000997003103 [Google Scholar]
28. Orr, J.
    (1962) Three studies on homonymics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Panther, K. U., & Radden, G.
    (Eds.) (2011) Motivation in grammar and the lexicon. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.27
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.27 [Google Scholar]
30. Plag, I.
    (1999) Morphological productivity: structural constraints on English derivation. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Radden, G., & Panther, K. U.
    (Eds.) (2004a) Studies in linguistic motivation. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Radden, G., & Panther, K. U.
    (2004b) Introduction: Reflections on motivation. InRadden & Günter (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (pp.1–46). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1075/hcp.27.02pan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.27.02pan [Google Scholar]
33. Renner, V., Maniez, F., & Arnaud, P. J. L.
    (Eds.) (2012) Cross-disciplinary perspectives on lexical blending. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110289572
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110289572 [Google Scholar]
34. Ruhl, C.
    (1989) On monosemy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Saussure, F.
    (1969) [1916] Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Schultink, H.
    (1961) Produktiviteit als morfologisch fenomeen. Forum der Letteren, 2, 110–125.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sinclair, J. M.
    (1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Storkel, H. L., & Maekawa, J.
    (2005) A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: the role of phonotactic probability and word frequency. Journal of Child Language, 32, 827–853. 10.1017/S0305000905007099
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000905007099 [Google Scholar]
39. Tulloch, S.
    (1991) The Oxford dictionary of new words. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ullmann, S.
    (1957) The principles of semantics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Vennemann, T.
    (1972) Phonetic analogy and conceptual analogy. InT. Vennemann & T. H. Wilbur (Eds.), Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the transformational theory of phonological change: Four essays (pp.181–204). Frankfurt: Athenaeum. (Cited inHock, H. H. (2003) Analogical change. InB. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp.441–460). Malden, MA: Blackwell.)
    [Google Scholar]
42. Weinreich, U.
    (1964) Languages in contact. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Wray, A.
    (2012) What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 231–254. 10.1017/S026719051200013X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719051200013X [Google Scholar]