1887
Volume 18, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Cognitive Linguistics and lexical change. Motion verbs from Latin to Romance

 

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00059.iba
2020-08-17
2020-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blank, A.
    (2003) Words and concepts in time: Towards diachronic cognitive onomasiology. InR. Eckardt, K. von Heusinger & Ch. Schwarze (Eds.), Words in time: Diachronic semantics from different points of view (pp.37–65). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110899979.37
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110899979.37 [Google Scholar]
  2. Iacobini, C.
    (2012) Grammaticalization and innovation in the encoding of motion events. Folia Linguistica, 46, 359–385. 10.1515/flin.2012.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2012.013 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2015) Particle-verbs in Romance. InP. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (Eds.), Word-formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe (pp.626–658). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110246254‑038
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-038 [Google Scholar]
  4. Koch, P.
    (2000a) Pour une approche cognitive du changement sémantique lexical: Aspect onomasiologique. Inthe Société de Linguistique de Paris (Ed.), Théories contemporaines du changement sémantique (pp.75–95). Leuven: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2000b) Indirizzi cognitivi per una tipologia lessicale dell’italiano. Italienische Studien, 21, 99–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2004) Diachronic onomasiology and semantic reconstruction. InW. Mihatsch & R. Steinberg (Eds.), Lexical data and universals of semantic change (pp.79–106). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Koch, P., & Marzo, D.
    (2007) A two-dimensional approach to the study of motivation in lexical typology and its first application to French high-frequency vocabulary. Studies in Language, 31(2), 259–291. 10.1075/sl.31.2.02koc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.2.02koc [Google Scholar]
  8. Kopecka, A.
    (2006) The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. InM. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp.83–101). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.66.06kop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.06kop [Google Scholar]
  9. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pountain, Ch. J.
    (2000) Pragmatic factors in the evolution of the Romance reflexive (with special reference to Spanish). Hispanic Research Journal, 1(1), 5–25. 10.1179/hrj.2000.1.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.1179/hrj.2000.1.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  12. Pourcel, S., & Kopecka, A.
    (2005) Motion expression in French: Typological diversity. Durham & Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, 139–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Simone, R.
    (2008) Verbi sintagmatici come categoria e come costruzione. InM. Cini (Ed.), I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali: Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca. Atti delle giornate di studio (Torino, 19–20 febbraio 2007) (pp.13–30). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Stefenelli, A.
    (1992) Das Schicksal des lateinischen Wortschatzes in den romanischen Sprachen. Passau: Richard Rothe.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Stolova, N. I.
    (2008) From satellite-framed Latin to verb-framed Romance: Late Latin as an intermediate stage. InR. Wright (Ed.), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif VIII: Actes du VIIIe Colloque International sur le Latin Vulgaire et Tardif, Oxford, 6–9 septembre 2006 (pp.253–262). Hildesheim: Georg Olms; Zürich: Weidmann.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Talmy, L.
    (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Traugott, E. C.
    (1985) On regularity in semantic change. Journal of Literary Semantics: An international review, 14(3), 155–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Traugott, E. C., & Dascher, R. B.
    (2002) Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
    (2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00059.iba
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error