A multimodal cognitive analysis of visual metonymies in picture books featuring same-sex-parent families

References

1. Barcelona, A.
   (2002) Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics: An update. InR. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp.202–277). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219197.207
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.207 [Google Scholar]
2. Cerrillo, P., & Yubero, S.
   (2007) Qué leer y en qué momento ‘What to read and when’. InP. Cerrillo & S. Yubero (Eds.), La formación de mediadores para la promoción de la lectura. Segunda Edición, ‘Training specialists in the promotion of reading’ (pp.285–293). Cuenca: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Evans, J.
   (Ed.) (2015) Challenging and controversial picture books. Creative and critical responses to visual texts. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315756912
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315756912 [Google Scholar]
4. Dziallas, K.
   (2019) The head and sexualized body parts as fruit and vegetables. Metaphor and the Social World, 92, 199–220. 10.1075/msw.18007.dzi
   https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.18007.dzi [Google Scholar]
5. Forceville, Ch.
   (1996) Pictorial metaphors in advertising. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203272305
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203272305 [Google Scholar]
6. Forceville, Ch.
   (2009) Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. InE. Ventola & A. J. Moya-Guijarro (Eds.), The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic issues (pp.57–74). Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Forceville, Ch.
   (2014) Relevance Theory as model for analyzing visual and multimodal vommunication. InD. Machin (Ed.), Visual Communication (pp.51–70). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110255492.51
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255492.51 [Google Scholar]
8. Forceville, Ch.
   (2019) Developments in multimodal metaphor studies: A response to Górska, Coëgnarts, Porto and Romano and Muelas-Gil. InI. Navarro & I. Ferrando (Eds.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse (pp.367–378). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110629460‑017
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110629460-017 [Google Scholar]
9. Forceville, Ch., & Urios-Aparisi, E.
   (Eds.) (2009) Multimodal metaphor. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110215366
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366 [Google Scholar]
10. Hamilton, M., Anderson, D., Broaddus, M., & Young, K.
    (2006) Gender stereotyping and under-representation of female characters in 200 popular children’s picture books: A twenty-first century update. Sex Roles, 55, 757–65. 10.1007/s11199‑006‑9128‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9128-6 [Google Scholar]
11. Hidalgo-Downing, L., & Kraljevic-Mujic, B.
    (2011) Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 153–178. 10.1075/rcl.9.1.08hid
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.08hid [Google Scholar]
12. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
13. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Littlemore, J.
    (2015) Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107338814
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814 [Google Scholar]
15. McCabe, J., Fairchild, E., Grauerholz, L., Pescosolido, B., & Tope, D.
    (2011) Gender in twentieth-century children’s books: Patterns of disparity in titles and central characters. Gender & Society, 25(2), 197–226. 10.1177/0891243211398358
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211398358 [Google Scholar]
16. Moya-Guijarro, A. J.
    (2013) Visual metonymy in children’s picture books. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 336–352. 10.1075/rcl.11.2.08moy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.11.2.08moy [Google Scholar]
17. Moya-Guijarro, A. J.
    (2014) A multimodal analysis of picture books for children: A systemic functional approach. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Moya-Guijarro, A. J.
    (2019) Textual functions of metonymies in Anthony Browne’s picture books: A multimodal approach. Text & Talk, 39(3), 389–413. 10.1515/text‑2019‑2034
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2034 [Google Scholar]
19. Nodelman, P.
    (1988) Words about pictures: The narrative art of children’s picture books. Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Painter, C., Martin, J., & Unsworth, L.
    (2013) Reading visual narratives: Image analysis of children’s picture books. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Pinar, M. J.
    (Ed.) (2013) Special Issue: Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Pinar, M. J.
    (Ed.) (2015) Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.78
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78 [Google Scholar]
23. Rowell, E.
    (2007) Missing! Picture books reflecting gay and lesbian families. Make the curriculum inclusive for all children. Young Children, 62(3),24–30.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
    (2000) The role of mapping and domains in understanding metonymy. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp.109–132). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Diez, I. O.
    (2002) Patterns of conceptual interaction. InR. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp.489–532). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219197.489
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.489 [Google Scholar]
26. Pérez-Sobrino, P.
    (2017) Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.2 [Google Scholar]
27. Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
    (1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. InK. Panther and G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp.17–59). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad [Google Scholar]
28. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
    (1985) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Second Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Sunderland, J.
    (2012) Language, gender and children’s fiction. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sunderland, J., & McGlashan, M.
    (2012) Stories featuring two-mum and two-dad families. InJ. Sunderland (Ed.), Language, gender and children’s fiction (pp.142–172). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Villacañas, B., & White, M.
    (2013) Pictorial metonymy as creativity source in Purificación García advertising campaigns. InL. Hidalgo & B. Kraljevic (Eds.), Metaphorical creativity across modes: Special issue of Metaphor and the Social World, 3(2),220–239. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Yu, N.
    (2009) Nonverbal and multimodal manifestations of metaphors and metonymies: A case study. InC. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp.119–143). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Yus, F.
    (2009) Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: a unified account. InC. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor, (pp.47–172). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Bryan, J., & Hosler, D.
    (2006) The different dragon. USA: Two Lives Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Clay, G. A., & Krebs, L.
    (2008) Why don’t I have a daddy?Bloomington: Author House.
    [Google Scholar]
36. De Haan, L., & Nijland, S.
    (2004) King and king and family. Berkeley: Tricycle Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Newman, L., & Dutton, M.
    (2011) Donovan’s big day. Berkeley: Tricycle Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Oelschlager, V., Backwood, K., & Blanc, M.
    (2010) A tale of two daddies. China: Vanita Books.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Richardson, J., Parnell, P., & Cole, H.
    (2005) And Tango makes three. New York & London: Simon and Schuster Books for Young Readers.
    [Google Scholar]