1887
Volume 18, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

According to the Body-Specificity Hypothesis, humans preferentially associate positive features with their dominant side with which they interact more fluently, and negatives features with their non-dominant side with which they act more clumsily. The current research investigated implicit space-valence mappings in two clinical populations, namely, patients with unilateral stroke and individuals who suffered the loss of a limb. Across the two studies, our findings offered general support for the Body-Specificity Hypothesis with important caveats. Specifically, the body-specificity effect was more detectable in the two groups of right-handed individuals with motor fluency impairment on their left side than healthy controls. This is possibly because the former can gain more fluent experience with their dominant hand since they exclusively use the intact hand for self-sufficiency, which may increase their bias toward “right-is-good” pattern. Taken together, the results provided converging evidence that individual differences in action fluency may moderate the body-specificity effect.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00069.li
2020-12-04
2021-02-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beilock, S. L. , & Holt, L. E.
    (2007) Embodied preference judgments: Can likeability be driven by the motor system?. Psychological Science, 18(1), 51–57. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2007.01848.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01848.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Boroditsky, L. , & Gaby, A.
    (2010) Remembrances of times East: absolute spatial representations of time in an Australian aboriginal community. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1635–1639. 10.1177/0956797610386621
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610386621 [Google Scholar]
  3. Button, K. S. , Ioannidis, J. P. , Mokrysz, C. , Nosek, B. A. , Flint, J. , Robinson, E. S. , & Munafò, M. R.
    (2013) Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365. 10.1038/nrn3475
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475 [Google Scholar]
  4. Casasanto, D.
    (2009) Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351–356. 10.1037/a0015854
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015854 [Google Scholar]
  5. Casasanto, D. , & Chrysikou, E. G.
    (2011) When left is “right”: Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychological Science, 22, 419–422. 10.1177/0956797611401755
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611401755 [Google Scholar]
  6. Casasanto, D. , & Henetz, T.
    (2012) Handedness shapes children’s abstract concepts. Cognitive Science, 36(2), 359–72. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2011.01199.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01199.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, M. , & Lin, C. H.
    (2019) What is in your hand influences your purchase intention: Effect of motor fluency on motor simulation. Current Psychology, 1–9. doi:  10.1007/s12144‑019‑00261‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00261-6 [Google Scholar]
  8. De la Fuente, J. , Casasanto, D. , & Santiago, J.
    (2015) Observed actions affect body-specific associations between space and valence. Acta Psychologica, 156, 32–36. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  9. De la Fuente, J. , Casasanto, D. , Martínez-Cascales, J. I. , & Santiago, J.
    (2017) Motor imagery shapes abstract concepts. Cognitive Science, 41(5), 1350–1360. 10.1111/cogs.12406
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12406 [Google Scholar]
  10. De la Fuente, J. , Casasanto, D. , Román, A. , & Santiago, J.
    (2015) Can culture influence body-specific associations between space and valence?. Cognitive Science, 39(4), 821–832. 10.1111/cogs.12177
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12177 [Google Scholar]
  11. Diedrichsen, J. , Hazeltine, E. , Kennerley, S. , & Ivry, R. B.
    (2001) Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychological Science, 12(6), 493–498. 10.1111/1467‑9280.00391
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00391 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dumas-Mallet, E. , Button, K. S. , Boraud, T. , Gonon, F. , & Munafò, M. R.
    (2017) Low statistical power in biomedical science: a review of three human research domains. Royal Society Open Science, 4(2), 160254. 10.1098/rsos.160254
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160254 [Google Scholar]
  13. Foolen, A.
    (2019) The value of left and right. In Mackenzie, J. L. & Alba-Juez, L. (Eds.). Emotion in discourse (pp.139–158). Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.302.06foo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.302.06foo [Google Scholar]
  14. Forth, G.
    (1985) Right and left as a hierarchical opposition: Reflections on eastern Sumbanese hairstyles. In R. H. Barnes , D. de Coppet & R. J. Parkin (Eds.), Contexts and levels: Anthropological essays on hierarchy (pp.103–116). Oxford: JASO.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gebruers, N. , Vanroy, C. , Truijen, S. , Engelborghs, S. , & De Deyn, P. P.
    (2010) Monitoring of physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of accelerometry-based measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(2), 288–297. 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.025 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gibbs, Jr. R. W.
    (2005) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805844
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805844 [Google Scholar]
  17. Granet, M.
    (1973) Right and left in China, transl. by Rodney Needham. In R. Needham (Ed.), Right and left (pp.43–58). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Henrich, J. , Heine, S. J. , & Norenzayan, A.
    (2010) The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X [Google Scholar]
  19. Hertz, R.
    (1909) La prééminence de la main droite: étude sur la polarité religieuse. Revue Philosophique de la France et de L’Étranger, 68, 553–580.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Holmes, K. J. , Alcat, C. , & Lourenco, S. F.
    (2019) Is emotional magnitude spatialized? A further investigation. Cognitive Science, 43(4), e12727. 10.1111/cogs.12727
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12727 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jang, C. H. , Yang, H. S. , Yang, H. E. , Lee, S. Y. , Kwon, J. W. , Yun, B. D. , & Jeong, H. W.
    (2011) A survey on activities of daily living and occupations of upper extremity amputees. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35(6), 907–921. 10.5535/arm.2011.35.6.907
    https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2011.35.6.907 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim, N. , Krosnick, J. , & Casasanto, D.
    (2015) Moderators of candidate name-order effects in elections: An experiment. Political Psychology, 36(5), 525–542. 10.1111/pops.12178
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12178 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kong, F.
    (2013) Space–valence associations depend on handedness: Evidence from a bimanual output task. Psychological Research, 77(6), 773–779. 10.1007/s00426‑012‑0471‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0471-7 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kövecses, Z.
    (2003) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, A. Y. , & Labroo, A. A.
    (2004) The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151–165. 10.1509/jmkr.41.2.151.28665
    https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.41.2.151.28665 [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, H. , & Cao, Y.
    (2019) The body in religion: The spatial mapping of valence in Tibetan practitioners of Bön. Cognitive Science, 43(4), e12728. 10.1111/cogs.12728
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12728 [Google Scholar]
  28. Loffing, F. , Prelle, L. , Heil, L. , & Cañal-Bruland, R.
    (2019) Body-specific influences on performance evaluation in realistic dynamic scenes. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 24(3), 355–372. 10.1080/1357650X.2018.1522323
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2018.1522323 [Google Scholar]
  29. Needham, R.
    (1973) Right and left: Essays in dual symbolic classification. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Oppenheimer, D. M.
    (2008) The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237–241. 10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014 [Google Scholar]
  31. Østlie, K. , Lesjø, I. M. , Franklin, R. J. , Garfelt, B. , Skjeldal, O. H. , & Magnus, P.
    (2012) Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 7(4), 294–303.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pitt, B. , & Casasanto, D.
    (2018) Spatializing emotion: No evidence for a domain-general magnitude system. Cognitive Science, 42(7), 2150–2180. 10.1111/cogs.12568
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12568 [Google Scholar]
  33. Reber, R. , Schwarz, N. , & Winkielman, P.
    (2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3 [Google Scholar]
  34. Reber, R. , Winkielman, P. , & Schwarz, N.
    (1998) Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48. 10.1111/1467‑9280.00008
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00008 [Google Scholar]
  35. Song, X. , Chen, J. , & Proctor, R. W.
    (2017) Role of hand dominance in mapping preferences for emotional-valence words to keypress responses. Acta Psychologica, 180, 33–39. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.08.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.08.007 [Google Scholar]
  36. Song, X. , Yi, F. , Zhang, J. , & Proctor, R. W.
    (2019) Left is “good”: Observed action affects the association between horizontal space and affective valence. Cognition, 193, 104030. 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104030
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104030 [Google Scholar]
  37. Swinnen, S. P. , Walter, C. B. , Lee, T. D. , & Serrien, D. J.
    (1993) Acquiring bimanual skills: Contrasting forms of information feedback for interlimb decoupling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(6), 1328.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Teasell, R. , Bayona, N. A. , & Bitensky, J.
    (2005) Plasticity and reorganization of the brain post stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 12(3), 11–26. 10.1310/6AUM‑ETYW‑Q8XV‑8XAC
    https://doi.org/10.1310/6AUM-ETYW-Q8XV-8XAC [Google Scholar]
  39. Veale, J. F.
    (2014) Edinburgh handedness inventory–short form: A revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 19(2), 164–177. 10.1080/1357650X.2013.783045
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2013.783045 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00069.li
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00069.li
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): action fluency , body-specificity effect , mental metaphor , replication and space-valence mapping
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error