1887
Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

While phrasal verbs (PVs) represent “a problematic feature of English vocabulary” (Garnier & Schmitt, 2016, p. 29) for a large number of learners, research into L2 English PVs remains insufficient. This study examines 150 tertiary-level L2 English learners’ knowledge of figurative meaning senses of PVs and the influence of congruence in the figurative meaning senses between L1 and L2 on their knowledge of the meaning senses. The research instruments consisted of a form-recall and a meaning-recall task, questionnaires, and focus group interviews. The results indicate that the learners’ PV knowledge differed significantly according to proficiency level and task type – production and reception. Further, L1 congruence influenced the learners’ knowledge of PVs differently depending on proficiency levels.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00080.kan
2021-04-28
2021-05-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrade, M. S. , & Evans, N. W.
    (2013) Principles and practices for response in second language writing: Developing self-regulated learners. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews, S. J.
    (2001) The language awareness of the L2 teacher: Its impact upon pedagogical practice. Language Awareness, 10(2), 75–90. doi:  10.1080/09658410108667027
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410108667027 [Google Scholar]
  3. Armstrong, K.
    (2004) Sexing up the dossier: A semantic analysis of phrasal verbs for language teachers. Language Awareness, 13(4), 213–224. doi:  10.1080/09658410408668808
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410408668808 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chung, I-F.
    (2013) Crammed to learn English: What are learners’ motivation and approach?Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 585–592. doi:  10.1007/s40299‑013‑0061‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0061-5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cieślicka, A. B. , Heredia, R. R. , & Olivares, M.
    (2014) It’s all in the eyes: How language dominance, salience, and context affect eye movements during idiomatic language processing. In M. Pawlak & L. Aronin (Eds.), Essential topics in applied linguistics and multilingualism: Studies in honor of David Singletion (pp.21–41). New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑01414‑2_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01414-2_2 [Google Scholar]
  6. Coxhead, A.
    (2018) Vocabulary and English for specific purposes research. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Crossley, S. A. , Cobb, T. , & McNamara, D. S.
    (2013) Comparing count-based and band-based indices of word frequency: Implications for active vocabulary research and pedagogical applications. System, 41(4), 965–981. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2013.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Crossley, S. A. , Salsbury, T. , & McNamara, D. S.
    (2015) Assessing lexical proficiency using analytic ratings: A case for collocation accuracy. Applied Linguistics, 36(5), 570–590. doi:  10.1093/applin/amt056
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt056 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dagut, M. , & Laufer, B.
    (1985) Avoidance of phrasal verbs: A case for contrastive analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(1), 73–79. 10.1017/S0272263100005167
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005167 [Google Scholar]
  10. Darwin, C. M. , & Gray, L. S.
    (1999) Going after the phrasal verbs: An alternative approach to classification. TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 65–83. doi:  10.2307/3588191
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588191 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dóczi, B. , & Kormos, J.
    (2016) Longitudinal developments in vocabulary knowledge and lexical organization. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210274.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210274.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Durrant, P. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2009) To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations?International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(2), 157–177. doi:  10.1515/iral.2009.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.007 [Google Scholar]
  13. Edmonds, A. , & Gudmestad, A.
    (2014) Your participation is greatly/highly appreciated: Amplifier collocations in L2 English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(1), 76–102. doi:  10.3138/cmlr.1704
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1704 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gardner, D.
    (2013) Exploring vocabulary: Language in action. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203798683
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798683 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gardner, D. , & Davies, M.
    (2007) Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 339–359. doi:  10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00062.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00062.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Garnier, M. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2015) The PHaVE list: A pedagogical list of phrasal verbs and their most frequent meaning senses. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 645–666. doi:  10.1177/1362168814559798
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814559798 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2016) Picking up polysemous phrasal verbs: How many learners know and what facilitates this knowledge. System, 59, 29–44. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2016.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  18. González Fernández, B. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2015) How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have? The effects of frequency and amount of exposure. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166(1), 94–126. doi:  10.1075/itl.166.1.03fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.166.1.03fer [Google Scholar]
  19. Grabe, W.
    (2009) Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Granger, S. , & Bestgen, Y.
    (2014) The use of collocations by intermediate vs. advanced non-native writers: A bigram-based study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(3), 229–252. doi:  10.1515/iral‑2014‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2014-0011 [Google Scholar]
  21. Granger, S. , & Paquot, M.
    (2008) Disentangling the phraseological web. In S. Granger & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp.27–49). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.139.07gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.139.07gra [Google Scholar]
  22. Horwitz, E. K.
    (1995) Student affective reactions and the teaching and learning of foreign languages. International Journal of Educational Research, 23(7), 573–579. doi:  10.1016/0883‑0355(96)80437‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(96)80437-X [Google Scholar]
  23. Hsu, J.
    (2007) Lexical collocations and their relation to the online writing of Taiwanese college English majors and non-English majors. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(2), 192–209.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hummel, K. M.
    (2010) Translation and short-term L2 vocabulary retention: Hindrance or help?Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 61–74. doi:  10.1177/1362168809346497
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809346497 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ishii, Y.
    (2009) Making a list of essential phrasal verbs based on large corpora and phrasal verb dictionaries. In Y. Kawaguchi , M. Minegishi , & J. Durand (Eds.), Corpus analysis and variation in linguistics (pp.121–140). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tufs.1.09ish
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tufs.1.09ish [Google Scholar]
  26. Kang, D.-M.
    (2014) The effects of study-abroad experiences on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate, speaking abilities, and participation in classroom interaction. System, 42, 319–332. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2013.12.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.025 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kao, R.
    (2001) Where have the prepositions gone? A study of English prepositional verbs and input enhancement in instructed SLA. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 39(3), 195–215. doi:  10.1515/iral.2001.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2001.002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kasahara, K.
    (2011) The effect of known-and-unknown word combinations on intentional vocabulary learning. System, 39(4), 491–499. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2011.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, Y. C.
    (2016) Shadow education and the curriculum and culture of schooling in South Korea. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑51324‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51324-3 [Google Scholar]
  30. Knowles, M. S.
    (1975) Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kövecses, Z. , & Radden, G.
    (1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–77. 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37 [Google Scholar]
  32. Krueger, R. A. , & Casey, M. A.
    (2000) Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Larsen-Freeman, D. , & Long, M. H.
    (1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Laufer, B. , & Eliasson, S.
    (1993) What causes avoidance in L2 learning: L1-L2 difference, L1-L2 similarity, or L2 complexity?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(1), 35–48. doi:  10.1017/S0272263100011657
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011657 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee, S. H. , & Muncie, J.
    (2006) From receptive to productive: Improving ESL learners’ use of vocabulary in a postreading composition task. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 295–320. doi:  10.2307/40264524
    https://doi.org/10.2307/40264524 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lewis, M.
    (2000) Learning in the lexical approach. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further developments in the lexical approach (pp.155–185). Hove, England: Language Teaching Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, L. , & Walsh, S.
    (2011) Technology uptake in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research, 15(1) 99–125. doi:  10.1177/1362168810383347
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383347 [Google Scholar]
  38. Liamputtong, P.
    (2011) Focus group methodology: Principles and practice. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781473957657
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957657 [Google Scholar]
  39. Liao, Y. , & Fukuya, Y. J.
    (2004) Avoidance of phrasal verbs: The case of Chinese learners of English. Language Learning, 54(2), 193–226. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00254.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00254.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Liontas, J. I.
    (2002) Exploring second language learners’ notions of idiomaticity. System30(3), 289–311. doi:  10.1016/S0346‑251X(02)00016‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00016-7 [Google Scholar]
  41. Litcofsky, K. A. , Tanner, D. , & van Hell, J. G.
    (2016) Effects of language experience, use, and cognitive functioning on bilingual word production and comprehension. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(6), 666–683. doi:  10.1177/1367006915579737
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006915579737 [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu, D.
    (2011) The most frequently used English phrasal verbs in American and British English: A multicorpus examination. TESOL Quarterly, 45(4), 661–688. doi:  10.5054/tq.2011.247707
    https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.247707 [Google Scholar]
  43. Macis, M. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2017) Not just ‘small potatoes’: Knowledge of the idiomatic meanings of collocations. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 321–340. doi:  10.1177/1362168816645957
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816645957 [Google Scholar]
  44. Macaro, E. , & Masterman, L.
    (2006) Does intensive explicit grammar instruction make all the difference?Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 297–327. doi:  10.1191/1362168806lr197oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr197oa [Google Scholar]
  45. Mackey, A.
    (2006) Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405–430. doi:  10.1093/applin/ami051
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami051 [Google Scholar]
  46. Martinez, R. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2012) A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 299–320. doi:  10.1093/applin/ams010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams010 [Google Scholar]
  47. Mennim, P.
    (2007) Long-term effects of noticing on oral output. Language Teaching Research, 11(3), 265–280. doi:  10.1177/1362168807077551
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807077551 [Google Scholar]
  48. Mercer, S.
    (2011) Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39(4), 427–436. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2011.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Nakata, T. , & Webb, S.
    (2016) Does studying vocabulary in smaller sets increase learning? The effects of part and whole learning on second language vocabulary acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 523–552. doi:  10.1017/S0272263115000236
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000236 [Google Scholar]
  50. Nassaji, H. , & Tian, J.
    (2010) Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 397–419. doi:  10.1177/1362168810375364
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375364 [Google Scholar]
  51. Nation, I. S. P.
    (1990) Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524759
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759 [Google Scholar]
  53. (2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?Canadian Modern Language Reviews, 63(1), 59–82. doi:  10.1353/cml.2006.0049
    https://doi.org/10.1353/cml.2006.0049 [Google Scholar]
  54. Nattinger, J. R. , & DeCarrico, J. S.
    (1992) Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Neufeld, G. G.
    (1979) Towards a theory of language learning ability. Language Learning, 29(2), 227–241. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1979.tb01066.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01066.x [Google Scholar]
  56. Park, E. S. , & Han, Z.-H.
    (2008) Learner spontaneous attention in L2 input processing: An exploratory study. In Z.-H. Han (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp.106–132). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Patton, M. Q.
    (1980) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Pica, T.
    (2005) Second language acquisition research and applied linguistics. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.263–280). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. , & Agustín Llach, M. P.
    (2016) Cognitive Pedagogical Grammar and meaning construction in L2. In S. De Knop & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied construction grammar (pp.151–183). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110458268‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268-007 [Google Scholar]
  61. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. , & Galera-Masegosa, A.
    (2011) Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation. Language Value, 3(1), 1–29. doi:  10.6035/LanguageV.2011.3.2
    https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2011.3.2 [Google Scholar]
  62. Schmitt, N.
    (2010) Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230293977
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977 [Google Scholar]
  63. (2014) Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64(4), 913–951. doi:  10.1111/lang.12077
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077 [Google Scholar]
  64. Schmitt, N. , & Redwood, S.
    (2011) Learner knowledge of phrasal verbs: A corpus-informed study. In F. Meunier , S. deCock , G. Gilquin , & M. Paquot (Eds.), A taste for corpora (pp.173–207). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.45.12sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.45.12sch [Google Scholar]
  65. Schneider, V. I. , Healy, A. F. , & Bourne, L. E.
    (2002) What is learned under difficult conditions is hard to forget: Contextual interference effects in foreign vocabulary acquisition, retention, and transfer. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 419–440. doi:  10.1006/jmla.2001.2813
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2813 [Google Scholar]
  66. Schouten-van Parreren, C.
    (1989) Vocabulary learning through reading: Which conditions should be met when presenting words in texts?AILA Review, 6, 75–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Siyanova, A. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2007) Native and nonnative use of multi-word vs one-word verbs. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(2), 109–139. doi:  10.1515/IRAL.2007.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2007.005 [Google Scholar]
  68. Siyanova-Chanturia, A.
    (2013) Eye-tracking and ERPs in multi-word expression research: A state-of-the-art review of the method and findings. The Mental Lexicon, 8(2), 245–268. doi:  10.1075/ml.8.2.06siy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.8.2.06siy [Google Scholar]
  69. Snodgrass, J. G.
    (1993) Translating versus picture naming: Similarities and differences. In R. Schreuder & B. Weltens (Eds.), The bilingual lexicon (pp.83–114). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.6.06sno
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.6.06sno [Google Scholar]
  70. VanPatten, B. , & Williams, J.
    (2015) Introduction: The nature of theories. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp.1–16). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Vaughn, S. , Shay Schumm, J. , & Sinagub, J.
    (1996) Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 10.4135/9781452243641
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243641 [Google Scholar]
  72. Webb, S.
    (2008) Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(1), 79–95. doi:  10.1017/S0272263108080042
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080042 [Google Scholar]
  73. (2009) The effects of receptive and productive learning of word pairs on vocabulary knowledge. RELC Journal, 40(3), 360–376. doi:  10.1177/0033688209343854
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688209343854 [Google Scholar]
  74. Williams, J.
    (1999) Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49(4), 583–625. doi:  10.1111/0023‑8333.00103
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00103 [Google Scholar]
  75. Williams, J. , & Evans, J.
    (1998) What kind of focus and on which forms?In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.139–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Wong, L. L. C. , & Nunan, D.
    (2011) The learning styles and strategies of effective language learners. System, 39(2), 144–163. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2011.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  77. Wood, D.
    (2010) Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence and classroom applications. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Youn, S. J.
    (2014) Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 pragmatic production: Investigating relationships among pragmatics, grammar, and proficiency. System, 42, 270–287. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2013.12.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.008 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00080.kan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00080.kan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error