1887
Volume 19, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Spoken metaphors such as “unstable situation” document a conceptual association between physical instability and difficult situations. Drawing on research in embodied cognition and conceptual metaphor, the present research examined whether people’s somatic experience can influence their attitudes toward the current COVID-19 pandemic. The hypothesis is that inducing a sensorimotor state such as physical instability can activate the associated abstract concepts such as the feelings of instability during a public health crisis. In Experiment 1, participants who sat at a wobbly table and chair believed more in and had greater concern about the coronavirus disease than participants in a stable workstation. Using a different manipulation of physical instability and a more diverse sample, Experiment 2 found that participants who stood on one foot rather than two were more likely to worry about the pandemic. Experiment 3 examined consequential behavior that might follow from respondents’ COVID-19-related attitudes. The results showed that participants who adopted a single-leg stance rather than a double-leg stance donated more money to the coronavirus treatment acceleration program aiming to stabilize the virus situation. Taken together, these findings indicate that seemingly irrelevant physical experiences can skew people’s opinions on the COVID-19 pandemic, exerting potential downstream effects on their actual behavior.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00094.li
2021-10-11
2021-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E.
    (2008) Embodied persuasion: Fundamental processes by which bodily responses can impact attitudes. InG. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp.184–207). New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805837.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805837.009 [Google Scholar]
  2. Duncan, L. A., Schaller, M., & Park, J. H.
    (2009) Perceived vulnerability to disease: Development and validation of a 15-item self-report instrument. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 541–546. 10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Earp, B. D., Everett, J. A., Madva, E. N., & Hamlin, J. K.
    (2014) Out, damned spot: Can the “Macbeth Effect” be replicated?Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(1), 91–98. 10.1080/01973533.2013.856792
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.856792 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ford, M. B.
    (2021) Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic as a predictor of daily psychological, social, and health-related outcomes. The Journal of General Psychology, 148(3), 1–23. 10.1080/00221309.2020.1860890
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2020.1860890 [Google Scholar]
  5. Forest, A. L., Kille, D. R., Wood, J. V., & Stehouwer, L. R.
    (2015) Turbulent times, rocky relationships: Relational consequences of experiencing physical instability. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1261–1271. 10.1177/0956797615586402
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615586402 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gao, Y., Sun, F., Jiang, W., Fang, Y., Yue, L., Lin, X., & Li, X.
    (2020) Beliefs towards the COVID-19 pandemic among patients with emotional disorders in China. General Psychiatry, 33(3), e100231. 10.1136/gpsych‑2020‑100231
    https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2020-100231 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gibbs, R. W.
    (2005) Embodiment and cognitive science. London: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805844
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805844 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2017) Metaphor wars. London: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107762350
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107762350 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N.
    (2020) Situated embodiment: When physical weight does and does not inform judgments of importance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1–8. doi:  10.1177/1948550620971968
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620971968 [Google Scholar]
  10. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A.
    (2010) The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X [Google Scholar]
  11. Kalichman, S. C.
    (1994) Magic Johnson and public attitudes toward AIDS: A review of empirical findings. AIDS Education and Prevention, 6, 542–557.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kille, D. R., Forest, A. L., & Wood, J. V.
    (2013) Tall, dark, and stable: Embodiment motivates mate selection preferences. Psychological Science, 24(1), 112–114. 10.1177/0956797612457392
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457392 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kövecses, Z.
    (2011) Recent developments in metaphor theory: Are the new views rival ones?. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the Auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 9(1), 11–25. 10.1075/rcl.9.1.02kov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.02kov [Google Scholar]
  14. Lakoff, G.
    (2012) Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 773–785. 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2012.01222.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01222.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Landau, M. J.
    (2016) Conceptual metaphor in social psychology: The poetics of everyday life. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315312019
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315312019 [Google Scholar]
  18. Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A.
    (2010) A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1045–1067. 10.1037/a0020970
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020970 [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, H.
    (2020) Less is more: Motor fluency impairment and body-specific representation of valence. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 18(2), 519–534. 10.1075/rcl.00069.li
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00069.li [Google Scholar]
  20. (2021) Follow or not follow?: The relationship between psychological entitlement and compliance with preventive measures to the COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences, 174, 110678. 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110678
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110678 [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, H., & Cao, Y.
    (2019) Losing your footing, losing your morality: The embodied effect of physical slant on moral judgment. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 17(2), 497–510. 10.1075/rcl.00044.li
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00044.li [Google Scholar]
  22. (2021a) The bright side of the COVID-19 pandemic: Public coughing weakens the overconfidence bias in non-health domains. Personality and Individual Differences, 178, 110861. 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110861
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110861 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2021b) In times of illness: Covid-19 threat influences temporal focus and implicit space-time mappings. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110561. 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110561
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110561 [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, H., & Shen, S.
    (2020) A clearer sense of self: relationship between bilingualism and overconfidence bias. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–14. doi:  10.1080/01434632.2020.1749644
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1749644 [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, Y., Johnson, E. J., & Zaval, L.
    (2011) Local warming: Daily temperature change influences belief in global warming. Psychological Science, 22(4), 454–459. 10.1177/0956797611400913
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611400913 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lu, J. G., Quoidbach, J., Gino, F., Chakroff, A., Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D.
    (2017) The dark side of going abroad: How broad foreign experiences increase immoral behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 1–16. 10.1037/pspa0000068
    https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000068 [Google Scholar]
  27. Meier, B. P., Schnall, S., Schwarz, N., & Bargh, J. A.
    (2012) Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 705–716. 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2012.01212.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01212.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Meischke, H., Sellers, D. E., Robbins, M. L., Goff, D. C., Daya, M. R., Meshack, A., & Hand, M. M.
    (2000) Factors that influence personal perceptions of the risk of an acute myocardial infarction. Behavioral Medicine, 26, 4–13. 10.1080/08964280009595748
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08964280009595748 [Google Scholar]
  29. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F.
    (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879–891. 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ostarek, M., & Huettig, F.
    (2019) Six challenges for embodiment research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(6), 593–599. 10.1177/0963721419866441
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419866441 [Google Scholar]
  31. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T.
    (1992) When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 160–164. 10.1037/0033‑2909.112.1.160
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.160 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Pérez-Hernández, L.
    (2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 161–185. 10.1080/10926488.2011.583189
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2011.583189 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sheetal, A., Feng, Z., & Savani, K.
    (2020) Using machine learning to generate novel hypotheses: Increasing optimism about COVID-19 makes people less willing to justify unethical behaviors. Psychological Science, 31(10), 1222–1235. 10.1177/0956797620959594
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620959594 [Google Scholar]
  34. Varma, D. D. V. N. A., Bagaria, A., Kumari, S., Rajan, M., Priya, A., & Brahmbhatt, H.
    (2020) Knowledge, awareness and practice of safety guidelines among layman population regarding prevention of COVID-19 infection. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research, 8(12), 35–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A.
    (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. 10.1037/0022‑3514.54.6.1063
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 [Google Scholar]
  36. Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A.
    (2008) Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322(5901), 606–607. 10.1126/science.1162548
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162548 [Google Scholar]
  37. Williams, L. E., Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A.
    (2009) The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1257–1267. 10.1002/ejsp.665
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.665 [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K.
    (2006) Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313(5792), 1451–1452. 10.1126/science.1130726
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130726 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00094.li
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error