1887
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The chapter is concerned with the metonymic use of in expressions such as . The metonymic nature underlying these expressions has already been noticed by Ruhl (1989) and Hirtle (2013). The present study focuses on the mapping of the literal use of as the metonymic source to its target. The metonymic source is characterized by the use of as an Achievement verb in sentences such as . The metonymic target in comprises two events, motion to a goal and a subsequent action. The relevant part of meaning resides in the unexpressed action. The action is inferred from the close relationship between a type of thing and potential actions afforded by the thing. In , the type noun affords metonymic “routes” to three motivated kinds of actions: ‘travelling’, ‘beginning a journey’ and ‘leaving’.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00105.rad
2022-05-24
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barcelona, A.
    (2009) Motivation of construction meaning and form: The roles of metonymy and inference. InK.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp.363–401). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.25.22bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.22bar [Google Scholar]
  2. (2011) Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. InR. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp.7–57). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.28.02bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.02bar [Google Scholar]
  3. (2015) Metonymy. InE. Dąbrowska & E. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.143–167). Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110292022‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110292022-008 [Google Scholar]
  4. Fillmore, Ch.
    (1970) The grammar of hitting and breaking, InR. A. Jacobs & P. S. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar (pp.120–133). Waltham, MA: Ginn & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibson, J. J.
    (2014) The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Psychological Press. 10.4324/9781315740218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218 [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Greenberg, S. R.
    (1966) Families of idioms in American English. Unpublished talk, Annual Meeting of LSA.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hirtle, W.
    (2013) Making sense out of meaning: An essay in lexical semantics. Québec: McGill-Queens University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kövecses, Z.
    (1989) Emotion concepts. New York & Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Langacker, R.
    (1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, VolII. Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
    (2009) Introduction: On figuration in grammar. InK.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp.1–44). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.25.03pan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.03pan [Google Scholar]
  13. Radden, G.
    (2009) Generic reference in English: A metonymic and conceptual blending analysis. InK.-U Panther, L. L. Thornburg & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp.199–228). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.25.13rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.13rad [Google Scholar]
  14. Ruhl, Ch.
    (1989) On monosemy: A study in linguistic semantics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Talmy, L.
    (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics, VolumeI, Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00105.rad
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00105.rad
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Achievement verb; affordance theory; complex event; force dynamics; metonymic route
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error