Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X


This article reviews Nodes and networks in diachronic Construction Grammar


Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Barðdal, J.
    (1999) Case and argument structure of some loan verbs in15th Century Icelandic. InI. Haskå & C. Sandqvist (Eds.), Alla tiders språk: En Vänskrift till Gertrud Pettersson november 1999 (pp.9–23). Lundastudier i Nordisk språkvetenskap A 55. Lund: Dept. of Scandinavian Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cappelle, B.
    (2006) Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions SV, 1(7), 1–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
    (2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  4. Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E.
    (2012) Paradigmatic integration. InK. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections (pp.111–134). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.130.05die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.130.05die [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2019) Explain me this. Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Janda, L. A.
    (2013) Quantitative methods in Cognitive Linguistics. InL. A. Janda (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: The quantitative turn (pp.1–32). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110335255.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335255.1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Leino, J. & Östman, J.-O.
    (2005) Constructions and variability. InM. Fried & H. Boas (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots (pp.191–213). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.4.12lei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.4.12lei [Google Scholar]
  8. Perek, F.
    (2015) Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.17 [Google Scholar]
  9. Schmid, H.-J.
    (ed.) (2016) Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Traugott, E. C. & Trousdale, G.
    (2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Van de Velde, F.
    (2014) Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. InR. Boogaart, T. Colleman & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar (pp.141–179). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110366273.141
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110366273.141 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error