1887
Volume 20, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper proposes to investigate the varying implications of the metaphor in scientific publications discussing the COVID-19 pandemic. The corpus under study is composed of articles retrieved from the international scientific journal , the weekly magazine , and the international agency . With a focus on three main characteristics of the pandemic – body health, medical solutions, and global impact of the virus – the present study asks to what extent the use of the metaphor can vary to offer different viewpoints on the pandemic. The particular view on the virus – through metaphorical use – depends on the readers each publication targets, the pressure to find solutions, the editorial requirements, and the aim of the publication. We conclude that the metaphor may not systematically be associated with disputable interpretations (as reported in literature), it also serves an explanatory function.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00117.aug
2022-12-08
2024-04-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amin, T.-G.
    (2020) Coordinating metaphors in science, learning, and instruction: The case of energy. InA. Beger & T. H. Smith (Eds.), How metaphors guide, teach and popularize science (pp.73–110). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.6.03ami
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.6.03ami [Google Scholar]
  2. Bate, B. R.
    (2020) The (in)appropriateness of the WAR metaphor in response to SARS-CoV-2: A rapid analysis of Donald J. Trump’s rhetoric. Frontiers in Communication, 5 (50), 1–12. 10.3389/fcomm.2020.00050
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00050 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyd, R.
    (1993) [1979] Metaphor and theory change: what is ‘metaphor’ a metaphor for?InA. Ortony (Ed). Metaphor and thought (2nd ed) (pp.481–532). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.023 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chapman, C.-M., & Miller, D.-S.
    (2020) From metaphor to militarized response: the social implications of “we are at war with COVID-19” – crisis, disasters, and pandemics yet to come. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(9/10), 1107–1124. 10.1108/IJSSP‑05‑2020‑0163
    https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-05-2020-0163 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cipolletta, S., & Ortu, M.-C.
    (2020) COVID-19: common constructions of the pandemic and their implications. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 34(3), 278–294. 10.1080/10720537.2020.1818653
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2020.1818653 [Google Scholar]
  6. Deignan, A.
    (2017) From linguistic to conceptual metaphors. InE. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp.102–117). London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Deignan, A., Semino, E., & Paul, S-AS
    (2019) Metaphors of climate science in three genres: research articles, educational texts, and secondary school student talk. Applied Linguistics, 40(2), 379–403. 10.1093/applin/amx035
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx035 [Google Scholar]
  8. El Refaie, E.
    (2015) Scoring a goal or an own-goal against disease? A multilevel framework for describing metaphor coherence in health campaigns. Metaphor and the Social World, 5(1), 102–123. 10.1075/msw.5.1.06ref
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.1.06ref [Google Scholar]
  9. Entman, R. M.
    (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01304.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Fillmore, C.
    2006 [1982] Frame Semantics. InD. Geeraerts (Ed), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp.373–400). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199901.373
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.373 [Google Scholar]
  11. Flusberg, S.-J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P.-H.
    (2017) Metaphors for the war (or race) against climate change. Environmental Communication, 11(6), 769–783. 10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111 [Google Scholar]
  12. Foust, C.-R., & Murphy, W.-OS.
    (2009) Revealing and reframing apocalyptic tragedy in global warming discourse. Environmental Communication, 3(2), 151–167. 10.1080/17524030902916624
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030902916624 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gentner, D., & Jeziorski, M.
    (1993) [1979] The shift from conceptual metaphor to analogy in Western science. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed) (pp.447–80). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.022 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gómez-Moreno, J.-M. U.
    (2020) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphors bring biology into the picture. InA. Beger & T. H. Smith (Eds.), How metaphors guide, teach and popularize science (pp.175–208). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.6.06gom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.6.06gom [Google Scholar]
  15. Greco Morasso, S.
    (2012) Contextual frames and their argumentative implications: A case study in media argumentation. Discourse Studies, 14(2), 197–216. 10.1177/1461445611433636
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611433636 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hellsten, I.
    (2000) Dolly: Scientific breakthrough or Frankenstein’s monster? Journalistic and scientific metaphors of cloning. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(4), 213–221. 10.1207/S15327868MS1504_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1504_3 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2002) The politics of metaphor: Biotechnology and biodiversity in the media, academic dissertation. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 876, Tampere University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hillmer, I.
    (2007) The way we think about diseases: “The immune defense” – comparing illness to war. NAWA J. Lang. Commun., 11, 22–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Isaacs, D., & Priesz, A.
    (2020) COVID-19 and the metaphor of war. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health (The Royal Australasian College of Physicians)
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kendall-Taylor, N., Erard, M., & Haydon, A.
    (2013) The use of metaphor as a science communication tool: Air traffic control for your brain. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41(4), 412–33. 10.1080/00909882.2013.836678
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2013.836678 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kilgarriff, A.
    (2014) SketchEngine, URL: sketchengine.eu
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Knudsen, S.
    (2015) A mere metaphor? Framings of the concept of metaphor in biological specialist communication. InJ. B. Hermann & T. B. Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor in specialist discourse (pp.191–215). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.4.08knu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.4.08knu [Google Scholar]
  23. Koteyko, N., Thelwall, M., & Nerlich, B.
    (2009) From carbon markets to carbon morality: creative compounds as framing devices in online discourses on climate change mitigation. Science Communication, 32(1), 25–54. 10.1177/1075547009340421
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009340421 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (2002) [1980]Metaphors we live by (2nd ed). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Musolff, A.
    (2016) Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (2022) “World-beating” pandemic responses: Ironical, sarcastic, and satirical use of war and competition metaphors in the context of covid-19 pandemic. Metaphor and Symbol, 37(2), 76ߝ87. 10.1080/10926488.2021.1932505
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1932505 [Google Scholar]
  27. Nerlich, B., & Hellsten, I.
    (2014) The greenhouse metaphor and the footprint metaphor: Climate change risk assessment and risk management seen through the lens of two prominent metaphors. Technikfolgenabschatzung: Theorie und Praxis, 23(2), 27–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nie, J.-B., Lloyd, G. A., de Roubaix, M., Staunton, C., van Niekerk, A., Tucker, J. D., & Rennie, S.
    (2016) Healing without waging war: beyond military metaphors in medicine and HIV cure research. The American Journal of Bioethics, 16(10), 3–11. 10.1080/15265161.2016.1214305
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2016.1214305 [Google Scholar]
  29. Oswick, C., Grant, D., & Oswick, R.
    (2020) Categories, crossroads, control, connectedness, continuity, and change: A metaphorical exploration of COVID-19. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 56(3), 284–288. 10.1177/0021886320936257
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320936257 [Google Scholar]
  30. Oxford English Dictionary
    Oxford English Dictionary (n.d.). URL: oed.com
  31. Reuchamps, M., Dodeigne, J., & Perrez, J.
    (2018) Changing your political mind: The impact of a metaphor on citizens’ representations and preferences for federalism. Regional & Federal Studies, 28(2), 151–175. 10.1080/13597566.2018.1433663
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2018.1433663 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ritchie, D.
    (2003) Argument is war – or is it a game of chess? Multiple meanings in the analysis of implicit metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 181, 125–146. 10.1207/S15327868MS1802_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1802_4 [Google Scholar]
  33. Rohela, P., Bhan, A., Ravindranath, D., Bose, D. L., & Pathere, S.
    (2020) Must there be a “war” against coronavirus?Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 5(3), 222–226. 10.20529/IJME.2020.070
    https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2020.070 [Google Scholar]
  34. Sabucedo, J.-M., Alzate, M., & Hur, D.
    (2020) COVID-19 and the metaphor of war. International Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3), 618–624. 10.1080/02134748.2020.1783840
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2020.1783840 [Google Scholar]
  35. Semino, E.
    (2011) The adaptation of metaphors across genres. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 130–52. 10.1075/rcl.9.1.07sem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.07sem [Google Scholar]
  36. (2020) “Not soldiers but firefighters” – Metaphors and Covid-19. Health Communication, 31(6), 50–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sontag, S.
    (1979) Illness as metaphor. New York: Allen Lane.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Steen, G.-J., Dorst, A. G., Berenike, H. J., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  39. Tognini-Bonelli, E.
    (2001) Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6 [Google Scholar]
  40. Weingart, P., Engels, A., & Pansegrau, P.
    (2000) Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 261–283. 10.1088/0963‑6625/9/3/304
    https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/304 [Google Scholar]
  41. Wicke, P., & Bolognesi, M.
    (2020) Framing COVID-19: how we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter. PLoS ONE, 15(9), e0240010. 10.1371/journal.pone.0240010
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240010 [Google Scholar]
  42. Williams Camus, J. T.
    (2009) Metaphors of cancer in scientific popularization articles in the British press. Discourse Studies, 11(4), 465–495. 10.1177/1461445609105220
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609105220 [Google Scholar]
  43. Williams Camus, J.-T.
    (2015) Metaphor, news discourse and knowledge. InJ.-B. Hermann & T.-B. Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor in specialist discourse (pp.245–70). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.4.10cam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.4.10cam [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00117.aug
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00117.aug
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): COVID-19; explanatory discourse; health science; ideological discourse; WAR metaphor
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error