1887
Volume 20, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study presents a contrastive analysis of antonym order in English and Chinese coordinate structures using a multifactorial corpus method. The analysis yields the following findings. First, antonym ordering in coordinate structures is driven largely by the same ordering constraints across the two languages. and are the most prominent semantic motivating constraints, and is the most important formal motivating constraint. Second, there are some differences in constraints on antonym ordering between English and Chinese. and exert a significant effect on Chinese antonym ordering, but show no effect on English antonym ordering. significantly affects Chinese antonym ordering, but has only a marginal effect on English antonym ordering. Furthermore, this study explores the motivations underlying these similarities and differences and argues that there is a clear correlation between iconicity and antonym order. The exploration reveals that their similarities in semantic constraints may be attributed to the iconicity of closeness and the iconicity of temporal sequence, while their differences may be ascribed to the iconicity of cultural values and norms. Their similarities in formal constraints stem from cognitive accessibility. These findings provide further evidence that antonym order is determined by general cognitive principles.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00121.wu
2022-12-08
2023-01-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Benor, S. B., & Levy, B.
    (2006) The chicken or the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English binomials. Language, 8(2), 233–278. 10.1353/lan.2006.0077
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0077 [Google Scholar]
  2. Biq, Y., Tai, J., & Thompson, S.
    (1996) Recent developments in functional approaches to Chinese. InC. Huang & Y. Li (Eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics (pp.97–140). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑1608‑1_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1608-1_4 [Google Scholar]
  3. Birdsong, D. P.
    (1979) Psycholinguistic perspectives on the phonology of frozen word order. Doctoral dissertation. Harvard University.
  4. Bock, J. K., & Levelt, W. J. M.
    (1994) Language production: Grammatical encoding. InM. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.945–984). San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boucher, J., & Osgood, C. E.
    (1969) The Pollyanna hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(1), 1–8. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(69)80002‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80002-2 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2007) Predicting the dative alternation. InG. Bouma, I. Krämer & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation (pp.69–94). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Charles, W., & Miller, G.
    (1989) Contexts of antonymous adjectives. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10(3), 357–375. 10.1017/S0142716400008675
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400008675 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, G., & Chung, J.
    (1994) The impact of Confucianism on organizational communication. Communication Quarterly, 42(2), 93–105. 10.1080/01463379409369919
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379409369919 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cooper, W. E., & Klouda, G. V.
    (1995) The psychological basis of syntactic iconicity. InM. E. Landsberg (Ed.), Syntactic iconicity and linguistic freezes: The human dimension (pp.331–342). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110882926.331
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882926.331 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cooper, W. E., & Ross, J. R.
    (1975) Word order. InE. Robin, L. Grossman, S. James & J. V. Timothy (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on functionalism (pp.63–111). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cruse, D. A.
    (1986) Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Davies, M.
    (2013) Opposition and ideology in news discourse. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Diessel, H.
    (2008) Iconicity of sequence: A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(3), 465–490. 10.1515/COGL.2008.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2008.018 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ding, J.
    (2018) A Lexical semantic study of Chinese opposites. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑6184‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6184-4 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ding, J., & Huang, C.
    (2014) Word ordering in Chinese opposite compounds. InS. Xu & T. He (Eds.), Proceedings of Chinese lexical semantics workshop, CLSW 2014 (pp.12–20). Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑14331‑6_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14331-6_2 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dressler, W. U.
    (1995) Interactions between iconicity and other semiotic parameters in language. InR. Simone (Ed.), Iconicity in language (pp.21–45). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.110.05dre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.110.05dre [Google Scholar]
  17. Enghels, R., Defrancq, B., & Jansegers, M.
    (2020) Reflections on the use of data and methods in contrastive linguistics. InR. Enghels, B. Defrancq & M. Jansegers (Eds.), New approaches to contrastive linguistics: Empirical and methodological challenges (pp.1–20). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110682588‑001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110682588-001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fellbaum, C.
    (1995) Co-occurrence and antonymy. International Journal of Lexicography, 8(4), 281–303. 10.1093/ijl/8.4.281
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/8.4.281 [Google Scholar]
  19. Givón, T.
    (1991) Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. Studies in Language, 15(1), 85–114. 10.1075/sl.15.1.04giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.15.1.04giv [Google Scholar]
  20. Gries, S. Th.
    (2003) Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. London: Continuum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2009) Quantitative corpus linguistics with R: A practical introduction. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203880920
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880920 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gries, S. Th., Jansegers, M., & Miglio, V. G.
    (2020) Quantitative methods for corpus-based contrastive linguistics. InR. Enghels, B. Defrancq & M. Jansegers (Eds.), New approaches to contrastive linguistics: Empirical and methodological Challenges (pp.53–84). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110682588‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110682588-003 [Google Scholar]
  23. Haiman, J.
    (1980) The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language, 56(3), 515–540. 10.2307/414448
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414448 [Google Scholar]
  24. (1985) Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6 [Google Scholar]
  25. Han, J., & Song, D.
    (2005) Antonym dictionary. Chengdu: Sichuan People’s Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hasselgård, H.
    (2020) Corpus-based contrastive studies: Beginnings, developments and directions. Languages in Contrast, 20(2), 184–208. 10.1075/lic.00015.has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00015.has [Google Scholar]
  27. Ho, D. Y. F.
    (1996) Filial piety and its psychological consequences. InM. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp.55–165). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hsu, C.
    (2015) A syntagmatic analysis of antonym co-occurrences in Chinese: Contrastive constructions and co-occurrence sequences. Corpora, 10(1), 47–82. 10.3366/cor.2015.0066
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2015.0066 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2019) A corpus-based study on the functions of antonym co-occurrences in spoken Chinese. Text & Talk, 39(4), 535–561. 10.1515/text‑2019‑2039
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2039 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hwang, K. K.
    (1999) Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in Confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 63–183. 10.1111/1467‑839X.00031
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00031 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jones, S.
    (2002) Antonymy: A corpus-based perspective. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203166253_chapter_11
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166253_chapter_11 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2006) A lexico-syntactic analysis of antonym co-occurrence in spoken English. Text & Talk, 26(2), 191–216. 10.1515/TEXT.2006.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.009 [Google Scholar]
  33. Jones, S., Murphy, M. L., Paradis, C., & Willners, C.
    (2012) Antonyms in English: Construals, constructions and canonicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139032384
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139032384 [Google Scholar]
  34. Justeson, J. S., & Katz, S. M.
    (1991) Co-occurrences of antonymous adjectives and their contexts. Computational Linguistics, 171, 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kolahdouz, M. M., Reza Gholi Famian, A., & Aghagolzadeh, F.
    (2019) Antonym sequence in Persian: A corpus-based study. Language Research, 10(1), 129–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kostić, N.
    (2011) Antonymous frameworks in Serbian written discourse: Phrasal contexts of antonym co-occurrence in text. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47(3), 509–537. 10.2478/psicl‑2011‑0027
    https://doi.org/10.2478/psicl-2011-0027 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2015) Antonym sequence in written discourse: A corpus-based study. Language Sciences, 471, 18–31. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.07.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.07.013 [Google Scholar]
  38. Landsberg, M. E.
    (1995) Semantic constraints on phonologically independent freezes. InM. E. Landberg (Ed.), Syntactic iconicity and linguistic freezes: The human dimension (pp.65–78). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110882926.65
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882926.65 [Google Scholar]
  39. Langendonck, W. V.
    (1995) Categories of word order iconicity. InM. E. Landsberg (Ed.), Syntactic iconicity and linguistic freezes: The human dimension (pp.79–90). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110882926.79
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882926.79 [Google Scholar]
  40. Levy, R.
    (2012) Probabilistic models in the study of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Liao, Q.
    (1992) The order of co-nominal elements in modern Chinese. Chinese Linguistics, (3), 161–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu, S.
    (2015) A Corpus study of the ordering constraints of coordinate binomials in English and Chinese: Reversibility and prediction success rate. Foreign Language Education, 36(6), 39–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Lohmann, A.
    (2014) English co-ordinate constructions: A processing perspective on constituent order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139644273
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139644273 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lohmann, A., & Takada, T.
    (2014) Order in NP conjuncts in spoken English and Japanese. Lingua, 1521, 48–64. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.09.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.09.011 [Google Scholar]
  45. Lu, W.
    (2002) The cognitive basis of word order. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, (5), 5–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lyons, G.
    (1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Malkiel, Y.
    (1959) Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua, 81, 113–160. 10.1016/0024‑3841(59)90018‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(59)90018-X [Google Scholar]
  48. Manser, H. M.
    (1989) Chambers dictionary of synonyms and antonyms. Cambridge: Chambers Harrap Publishers Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Matlin, M. W., & Stang, D. J.
    (1978) The Pollyanna principle: Selectivity in language, memory, and thought. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Mayerthaler, W.
    (1988) Morphological naturalness. Trans. ByJanice Seidler. Ann Arbor: Karoma.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Mettinger, A.
    (1994) Aspects of semantic opposition in English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Mollin, S.
    (2014) The (ir)reversibility of English binomials: Corpus, constraints, developments. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.64
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.64 [Google Scholar]
  53. Morgan, E., & Levy, R.
    (2016) Abstract knowledge versus direct experience in processing of binominal expressions. Cognition, 1571, 384–402. 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.011 [Google Scholar]
  54. Murphy, M. L.
    (2003) Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonyms, synonyms and other semantic paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486494
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486494 [Google Scholar]
  55. (2006) Antonymy as lexical constructions: or, why paradigmatic construction is not an oxymoron. InD. Schönefeld (Ed.), Constructions All Over: Case Studies and Theoretical Implications. ConstructionsSV 1 (pp.1–37). Available at: sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/701/. Accessed: 25 March 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Osgood, C. E., May, W. H., & Smith, E. E.
    (1975) Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Panther, K. U., & Thornburg, L. L.
    (2012) Antonymy in language and use. InM. Brdar, I. Raffaelli & M. Ž. Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics between universality and variation (pp.161–188). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Renner, V.
    (2014) A study of element ordering in English coordinate lexical items. English Studies, 95(4), 441–458. 10.1080/0013838X.2014.908039
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2014.908039 [Google Scholar]
  59. Shu, D., & Huang, J.
    (2008) A cognitive approach to the internal sequence and semantic changes of Chinese antonymic compounds. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 40(1), 418–422.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Spooner, A.
    (2007) The Oxford dictionary of synonyms and antonyms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Stallings, L. M., MacDonald, M. C., & O’Seaghdha, P. G.
    (1998) Phrasal ordering constraints in sentence production: Phrase length and verb disposition in heavy-NP shift. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 392–417. 10.1006/jmla.1998.2586
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2586 [Google Scholar]
  62. Tachihara, K., & Goldberg, A. E.
    (2020) Cognitive accessibility predicts word order of couples’ names in English and Japanese. Cognitive Linguistics, 31(2), 231–249. 10.1515/cog‑2019‑0031
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2019-0031 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tai, J. H.-Y.
    (1985) Temporal sequence and Chinese word order. InJ. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp.49–72). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.6.04tai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.04tai [Google Scholar]
  64. Trotzke, A., & Wittenberg, E.
    (2019) Long-standing issues in adjective order and corpus evidence for a multifactorial approach. Linguistics, 57(2), 273–282. 10.1515/ling‑2019‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0001 [Google Scholar]
  65. Willners, C.
    (2001) Antonyms in context: A corpus-based semantic analysis of Swedish descriptive adjectives. Doctoral dissertation. Lund University.
  66. Wu, S.
    (2014) The metonymic interpretation of Chinese antonym co-occurrence constructions: The case of you X you Y. Language Sciences, 451, 189–201. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  67. (2017) Iconicity and viewpoint: Antonym order in Chinese four-character patterns. Language Sciences, 591, 117–134. 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wulff, S.
    (2003) A multifactorial corpus analysis of adjective order in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 245–282. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.04wul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.04wul [Google Scholar]
  69. Wulff, S., & Gries, S. Th.
    (2015) Prenominal adjective order preferences in Chinese and German L2 English: A multifactorial corpus study. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5(1), 122–150. 10.1075/lab.5.1.05wul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.5.1.05wul [Google Scholar]
  70. Xu, A.
    (2000) Antonym application dictionary. Beijing: Language and Culture Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Xu, Z., & Zhang, G.
    (2015) A study on Chinese local morpheme antonym of nouns. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences), 57(4), 41–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhang, Q., & Zhang, Z.
    (2009) Antonym dictionary. Shanghai: Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00121.wu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00121.wu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): accessibility; antonym order; coordinate structure; iconicity; multifactorial analysis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error