1887
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Growing evidence shows the role of teachers gestures not only in L2 learning (Stam & Tellier, 2021) but also in supporting learning in the L1 classroom (Alibali et al., 2014Crowder, 1996Wilson et al., 2014). The current study aims at contributing to this last perspective. Based on data from a 3rd grade plurilingual classroom in an Italian school, it observes the ‘catchments’ (McNeill, 2000) in teacher’s gesticulation during a cycle of lessons on “The origin of life”. The analysis identifies conceptual components based on the metaphor associated with gestures, and observes their alignment with lexical items – either technical or common words (; ) – in speech. The gesture-word association supports both the conceptualization of the notions and the acquisition of the related lexicon: gestures connect recurring concepts to their different verbalisations, ensuring a conceptually coherent representation over the lesson; they establish synonimic relations between technical and common words; and they can also work as memory triggers towards and between concepts and lexical units.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00125.and
2023-01-31
2024-04-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alibali, Martha W., Nathan, M. J., Wolfgram, M. S., Church, R. B., Jacobs, S. A., Johnson Martinez, C., & Knuth, E. J.
    (2014) How teachers link ideas in mathematics instruction using speech and gesture: A corpus analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 32(1), 65–100. 10.1080/07370008.2013.858161
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.858161 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alibali, Martha Wagner, & Nathan, M. J.
    (2012) Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247–286. 10.1080/10508406.2011.611446
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611446 [Google Scholar]
  3. Andorno, C.
    (2022) Ideational, interpersonal, and textual functions of coverbal gestures in speech. Remarks from a teacher talk sample. InM. Voghera (Ed.), From speaking to grammar (pp.57–74). Berlin: Peter Lang
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Andrä, C., Mathias, B., Schwager, A., Macedonia, M., & von Kriegstein, K.
    (2020) Learning foreign language vocabulary with gestures and pictures enhances vocabulary memory for several months post-learning in eight-year-old school children. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 815–850. 10.1007/s10648‑020‑09527‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09527-z [Google Scholar]
  5. Aussems, S., & Kita, S.
    (2019) Seeing iconic gestures while encoding events facilitates children’s memory of these events. Child Development, 90(4), 1123–1137. 10.1111/cdev.12988
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12988 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barsalou, L. W.
    (2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, (59), 617–645. 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2010) Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future: Topics in Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 716–724. 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2010.01115.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Belhiah, H.
    (2013) Using the Hand to Choreograph Instruction: On the Functional Role of Gesture in Definition Talk. The Modern Language Journal, 97(2), 417–434. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12012.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12012.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Berretta, M.
    (1991) (De)formazione del lessico tecnico nell’italiano di studenti universitari. InC. Lavinio & A. A. Sobrero (Eds.), La lingua degli studenti universitari (pp.101–121). Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Borgonovi, F., & Montt, G.
    (2012) Parental involvement in selected PISA countries and economies. OECD. 10.1787/5k990rk0jsjj‑en
    https://doi.org/10.1787/5k990rk0jsjj-en [Google Scholar]
  11. Boroditsky, L.
    (2000) Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00073‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6 [Google Scholar]
  12. Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M.
    (2002) The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185–189. 10.1111/1467‑9280.00434
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00434 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cienki, A., & Müller, C.
    (2008) Metaphor, Gesture, and Thought. InR. W. Jr. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.483–501). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.029
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.029 [Google Scholar]
  14. Crowder, E. M.
    (1996) Gestures at work in sense-making science talk. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3), 173–208. 10.1207/s15327809jls0503_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0503_2 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cummins, J.
    (2000) Language, power, and pedagogy: bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon; Buffalo: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853596773
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596773 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cummins, J., & Man, E. Y.-F.
    (2007) Academic Language: What is it and how do we acquire it?InJohn Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching, vol.21 (pp.797–810). New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑46301‑8_53
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_53 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dargue, N., & Sweller, N.
    (2018) Donald Duck’s garden: The effects of observing iconic reinforcing and contradictory gestures on narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1751, 96–107. 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  18. Drijvers, L., & Ozyurek, A.
    (2017) Visual context enhanced: The joint contribution of iconic gestures and visible speech to degraded speech comprehension. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 212–222. 10.1044/2016_JSLHR‑H‑16‑0101
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0101 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fritz, I., Kita, S., Littlemore, J., & Krott, A.
    (2021) Multimodal language processing: How preceding discourse constrains gesture interpretation and affects gesture integration when gestures do not synchronise with semantic affiliates. Journal of Memory and Language, 1171, 104191. 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104191
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104191 [Google Scholar]
  20. Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2011) Learning through gesture. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 21, 595–607. 10.1002/wcs.132
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.132 [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W.
    (2013) Gesture’s Role in Speaking, Learning, and Creating Language. Annual Review of Psychology, 641, 257–283. 10.1146/annurev‑psych‑113011‑143802
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143802 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gould, S. J.
    (1987) Time’s arrow, time’s cycle. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (2003) The functional basis of language. InM. A. K. Halliday (Ed.), On language and linguistics (pp.298–322). London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Heath, C., & Luff, P.
    (2013) Embodied Action and Organizational Activity. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Herodotou, C.
    (2018) Young children and tablets: A systematic review of effects on learning and development. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 1–9. 10.1111/jcal.12220
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12220 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hudson, N.
    (2011) Teacher gesture in a post-secondary English as a second language classroom: A sociocultural approach. University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kelly, S. D., Özyürek, A., & Maris, E.
    (2010) Two sides of the same coin: Speech and gesture mutually interact to enhance comprehension. Psychological Science, 21(2), 260–267. 10.1177/0956797609357327
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609357327 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kendon, A.
    (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kita, S., Alibali, M. W., & Chu, M.
    (2017) How do gestures influence thinking and speaking? The gesture-for-conceptualization hypothesis. Psychological Review, 124(3), 245–266. 10.1037/rev0000059
    https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000059 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kita, S., & Ozyurek, A.
    (2003) What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16–32. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(02)00505‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lauer, C.
    (2009) Contending with terms: “Multimodal” and “Multimedia” in the academic and public spheres. Computers and Composition, 26(4), 225–239. 10.1016/j.compcom.2009.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lazaraton, A.
    (2004) Gesture and Speech in the Vocabulary Explanations of One ESL Teacher: A Microanalytic Inquiry. Language Learning, 54(1), 79–117. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00249.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00249.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Löhr, G.
    (2019) Embodied cognition and abstract concepts: Do concept empiricists leave anything out?Philosophical Psychology, 32(2), 161–185. 10.1080/09515089.2018.1517207
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2018.1517207 [Google Scholar]
  35. McNeill, D.
    (2000) Catchments and contexts: Non-modular factors in speech and gesture production. InD. Mcneill (Ed.), Language and Gesture (pp.312–328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.019 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mittelberg, I., & Waugh, L. R.
    (2009) Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. InC. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor, Applications of cognitive linguistics (pp.329–356). Berlin ; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Moore, K. E.
    (2017) Elaborating time in space: The structure and function of space–motion metaphors of time. Language and Cognition, 9(2), 191–253. 10.1017/langcog.2016.6
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.6 [Google Scholar]
  39. Negueruela-Azarola, E., García, P. N., & Buescher, K.
    (2015) From Interaction to Intra-action: The internalization of Talk, Gesture, and Concepts in the Second Language Classroom. The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp.233–249). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 10.1002/9781118531242.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118531242.ch14 [Google Scholar]
  40. Parmigiani, D.
    (2004) Didattica e tecnologia diffusa: Riflessioni per un’antropologia multimediale. Milano: Angeli.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Reinboth, T., & Farkaš, I.
    (2022) Ultimate Grounding of Abstract Concepts: A Graded Account. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 21. 10.5334/joc.214
    https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.214 [Google Scholar]
  42. Rivoltella, P. C.
    (Ed.) (2014) Smart future. Didattica, media digitali e inclusione. Milano: Angeli.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1984) On some gestures’ relation to talk. InM. Atkinson & J. C. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp.266–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Schwab, G.
    (2011) From dialogue to multilogue: A different view on participation in the English foreign-language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 2(1), 3–19. 10.1080/19463014.2011.562654
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2011.562654 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sert, O.
    (2015) 5. Use of multimodal resources in L2 classroom interaction. Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse (pp.87–111). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748692651‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748692651-007 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sime, D.
    (2006) What do learners make of teachers’ gestures in the language classroom?IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44(2), 211–230. 10.1515/IRAL.2006.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2006.009 [Google Scholar]
  47. Singer, M., Radinsky, J., & Goldman, S. R.
    (2008) The role of gesture in meaning construction. Discourse Processes, 45(4–5), 365–386. 10.1080/01638530802145601
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802145601 [Google Scholar]
  48. Smotrova, T., & Lantolf, J. P.
    (2013) The Function of Gesture in Lexically Focused L2 Instructional Conversations. The Modern Language Journal, 97(2), 397–413. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12008.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12008.x [Google Scholar]
  49. Stam, G., & Tellier, M.
    (2021) Gesture Helps Second and Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. InA. Morgenstern & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Gesture in Language: Development Across the Lifespan (p.30). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110567526‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110567526-014 [Google Scholar]
  50. Taylor, R.
    (2014) Meaning between, in, and around words, gestures and postures: Multimodal meaning making in children’s classroom communication. Language and Education, 28(5), 401–420. 10.1080/09500782.2014.885038
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.885038 [Google Scholar]
  51. van Leeuwen, T.
    (2015) Multimodality in education: Some directions and some questions. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 582–589. 10.1002/tesq.242
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.242 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wagner, P.
    (2014) Gesture and speech in interaction: An overview. Speech Communication, 571, 209–232. 10.1016/j.specom.2013.09.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2013.09.008 [Google Scholar]
  53. Werth, A.
    (2012) Avoiding the pitfall of progress and associated perils of evolutionary education. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(2), 249–265. 10.1007/s12052‑012‑0417‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-012-0417-y [Google Scholar]
  54. Wilson, A. A., Boatright, M. D., & Landon-Hays, M.
    (2014) Middle School Teachers’ Discipline-Specific Use of Gestures and Implications for Disciplinary Literacy Instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2), 234–262. 10.1177/1086296X14532615
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X14532615 [Google Scholar]
  55. Zwaan, R. A.
    (2014) Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(5), 229–234. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.008 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00125.and
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00125.and
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error