1887
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Cognitive Linguistics claims that language is not purely abstract and arbitrary, but meaningful and grounded in concepts arising from our embodied experiences (Oakley, 2007). The potential of using imagery and bodily representations to explain the conceptual motivation of grammar has been widely recognized in the context of language acquisition and teaching. This study investigates whether an increase of learners’ bodily engagement through the performance of bodily movements and locomotion produces even greater learning outcomes. To this end, we refer to Talmy’s (2000) Force Dynamic System to conduct a pretest-posttest interventional study with two groups of learners dealing with the German modal verb system. Whereas the first group watched multimedia animations (low bodily engagement), the second group was asked to perform bodily movements in line with the force-dynamic notions underlying the different modal verbs (high bodily engagement). The results show that both groups produced similar learning gains and that an increased bodily engagement could not be associated directly with a significantly better performance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00126.sun
2023-01-31
2024-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Achard, M.
    (1998) Representation of cognitive structures. Syntax and semantics of French sentential complements. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110805956
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805956 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnett, C., & Suñer, F.
    (2019) Leveraging cognitive linguistic approaches to grammar teaching with multimedia animations. Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(3), 365–399. 10.17791/jcs.2019.20.3.365
    https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2019.20.3.365 [Google Scholar]
  3. Asher, J.
    (1977) Learning Another Language Through Actions: The Complete Teacher’s Guidebook. California: Sky Oaks Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K.
    (2010) Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112(3), 150–158. 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bielak, J., & Pawlak, M.
    (2011) Teaching English tense and aspect with the help of cognitive grammar: An empirical study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1(3), 365–400. 10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.3.4
    https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.3.4 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2013) Applying cognitive grammar in the foreign language classroom: Teaching english tense and aspect. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑27455‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27455-8 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boieblan, M.
    (2022) Enhancing English spatial prepositions acquisition among Spanish learners of English as L2 through an embodied approach. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, ahead of print. 10.1515/iral‑2021‑0151
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0151 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boye, K.
    (2001) The force-dynamic core meaning of Danish modal verbs. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics, 331, 19–66. 10.1080/03740463.2001.10412194
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2001.10412194 [Google Scholar]
  9. Comisso & Della Putta
    Comisso & Della Putta, in this issue. Fostering the learning of the Russian motion verbs system in Italian-speaking students: An experimental study inspired by embodied approaches to language teaching.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Common European framework of reference for languages learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, MACambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. De Knop, S.
    (2020) The embodied teaching of complex verbal constructions with German placement verbs and spatial prepositions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 18(1), 131–161. 10.1075/rcl.00054.kno
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00054.kno [Google Scholar]
  12. Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill, P. D.
    (2003) Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work, 20(2), 159–165.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Duden
    Duden (2005) Die Grammatik. Unentbehrlich für richtiges Deutsch, 7. edition. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ellis, N. C.
    (2019) Essentials of a theory of language cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 1031, 39–60. 10.1111/modl.12532
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12532 [Google Scholar]
  15. Evans, V., & Green, M.
    (2006) Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ and Edinburgh: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gallagher, S., & Lindgren, R.
    (2015) Enactive metaphors: Learning through full-body engagement. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 391–404. 10.1007/s10648‑015‑9327‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9327-1 [Google Scholar]
  17. Glenberg, A., Witt, J., & Metcalfe, J.
    (2013) From the revolution to embodiment: 25 years of cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 573–585. 10.1177/1745691613498098
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613498098 [Google Scholar]
  18. Horwitz, E. K.
    (1999) Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: a review of BALLI studies. System, 271, 57–576. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(99)00050‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00050-0 [Google Scholar]
  19. Huumo, T.
    (2017) The grammar of temporal motion: A Cognitive Grammar account of motion metaphors of time. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(1), 1–43. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0015 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ionescu, T., & Ilie, A.
    (2018) Language learning in preschool children: an embodied learning account. Early Child Development and Care, 188(1), 4–15. 10.1080/03004430.2016.1189419
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1189419 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jacobsen, N.
    (2018) The best of both worlds: Combining cognitive linguistics and pedagogic tasks to teach English conditionals. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 668–693.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Birchfield, D. A., Tolentino, L., & Koziupa, T.
    (2014) Collaborative embodied learning in mixed reality motion-capture environments: Two science studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1061, 86–104. 10.1037/a0034008
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034008 [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., Birchfield, D. A., & Savio-Ramos, C.
    (2016) Effects of embodied learning and digital platform on the retention of physics content: Centripetal force. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 1819. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01819
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01819 [Google Scholar]
  24. Johnson-Glenberg, M. C.; Bartolomea, H., & Kalina, E.
    (2021) Platform is not destiny: Embodied learning effects comparing 2D desktop to 3D virtual reality STEM experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1263–1284. 10.1111/jcal.12567
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12567 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kanaplianik, K.
    (2016) Kognitionslinguistische Animationen für die deutschen Modalverben. Zusammenspiel der kognitiven Linguistik und des multimedialen Lernens bei der Sprachvermittlung. Berlin & Münster: Lit.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kohl-Dietrich, D., Juchem-Grundmann, C., & Schnotz, W.
    (2016) Conceptual Motivation as a tool for raising language awareness in the English as a foreign language classroom – Does it enhance learning outcomes? Insights from an empirical study. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 4(1), 193–209. 10.1515/gcla‑2016‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2016-0013 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ladendorf, K., Schneider, D., & Xie, Y.
    (2019) Mobile-based virtual reality: Why and how does it support learning?InA. Zhang & D. Cristol (Eds.), Handbook of mobile teaching and learning (2nd ed.) (pp.1–19). New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Langacker, R. W.
    (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2008) Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (2009) Teaching and testing grammar. InM. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp.518–542). Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444315783.ch27
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch27 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E.
    (2016) Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers and Education, 951, 174–187. 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Xiaoquing, C.
    (2009) L2 learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 91–104. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00830.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Mayer, R. E.
    (2014) Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. InR. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, (pp.43–71). New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mortelmans, T.
    (2001) An introduction to Langacker grounding predications mood and modal verbs in German. InH. Vater & O. Letnes (Eds.), Modalität und mehr. Modality and more (pp.3–26). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Niemeier, S.
    (2017) Task-based grammar teaching of English: Where cognitive grammar and task-based Language teaching meet. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Oakley, T.
    (2007) Image schemas. InD. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp.214–235). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Palmer, F.
    (1990) Modality and the English modals (2nd ed). London & New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Puchta, Herbert
    (2010) Beyond materials, techniques and linguistic analyses: The role of motivation, beliefs and identity. Puertas Abiertas, 61. Link: www.herbertpuchta.com/page/handouts/Italy/Beliefs_Italy_Tour.pdf [Accessed onApril 21, 2022].
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Purpura, J. E.
    (2004) Assessing grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511733086
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733086 [Google Scholar]
  40. Qin, J., Zhangxin, W., & Shuneng, Z.
    (2022) When concept-based language instruction meets Cognitive Linguistics: teaching English phrasal verbs with up and out. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, ahead of print. 10.1515/iral‑2021‑0164
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0164 [Google Scholar]
  41. Radden, G., & Dirven, R.
    (2007) Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clip.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.2 [Google Scholar]
  42. Roche, J.
    (2013) Mehrsprachigkeitstheorie. Erwerb – Kognition – Transkulturation – Ökologie. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2020) Das Aktuelle Grammatikstudio A1. München: hueber/Multilingua Akademie. Link: https://granima.de
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Roche, J., & Scheller, J.
    (2008) Grammar animations and cognitive theory of multimedia learning. InF. Zhang & B. Barber (Eds.), Handbook of research on computer-enhanced language acquisition and learning (pp.205–219). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978‑1‑59904‑895‑6.ch012
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-895-6.ch012 [Google Scholar]
  45. Roche, J., & Suñer, F.
    (2016) Metaphors and grammar teaching. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 4(1), 89–112. 10.1515/gcla‑2016‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2016-0008 [Google Scholar]
  46. Rohrer, T.
    (2006) Image schemata in the brain. InB. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp.165–196). Berlin & Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Scheller, J.
    (2009) Animationen in der Grammatikvermittlung. Multimedialer Spracherwerb am Beispiel von Wechselpräpositionen. Berlin & Münster: Lit Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Shapiro, L.
    (2019) Embodied cognition (2nd ed). London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315180380
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180380 [Google Scholar]
  49. Shapiro, L., & Stolz, A.
    (2019) Embodied cognition and its significance for education. Theory and Research in Education, 17(1), 19–39. 10.1177/1477878518822149
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878518822149 [Google Scholar]
  50. Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D.
    (2018) Embodied learning: introducing a taxonomy based on bodily engagement and task integration. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), 6. 10.1186/s41235‑018‑0092‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0092-9 [Google Scholar]
  51. Song, H. S., Pusic, M., Nick, M. W., Sarpel, U., Plass, J. L., & Kalet, A. L.
    (2014) The cognitive impact of interactive design features for learning complex materials in medical education. Computers & Education, 711, 198–205. 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.017 [Google Scholar]
  52. Stolz, S.
    (2015) Embodied learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(5), 474–487. 10.1080/00131857.2013.879694
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.879694 [Google Scholar]
  53. Suñer, F., & Roche, J.
    (2021) Embodiment in concept-based L2 grammar teaching: The case of German light verb constructions. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 16(4), 495–513. 10.1515/iral‑2018‑0362
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-0362 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sweetser, E.
    (1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  55. Talmy, L.
    (1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 121, 49–100. 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  56. (2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Tran, C., Smith, B., & Buschkuehl, M.
    (2017) Support of mathematical thinking through embodied cognition: Nondigital and digital approaches. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 21, 16. 10.1186/s41235‑017‑0053‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0053-8 [Google Scholar]
  58. Tyler, A.
    (2008) Cognitive linguistics and second language instruction. InP. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.456–488). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E.
    (2017) The embodied mind. Revised edition: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262529365.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262529365.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  60. Vater, H.
    (2010) Möchten als Modalverb. InA. Kątny & A. Socka (Eds.), Modalität. Temporalität in kontrastiver und typologischer Sicht (pp.99–112). Frankfurt am Main/New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Vázquez, C. D., Xia, L., Aikawa, T., & Maes, P.
    (2018) Words in motion: Kinesthetic language learning in virtual reality. In2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp.9–13). 10.1109/ICALT.2018.00069
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2018.00069 [Google Scholar]
  62. Zakhia Doueihi, J., & François, T.
    (2022) Concept-based instruction for applied L2 acquisition. Systematic review. Pedagogical Linguistics, 3(1), 84–107. 10.1075/pl.21006.zak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.21006.zak [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00126.sun
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00126.sun
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): animations; embodiment; force-dynamics; grammar learning
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error