1887
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The study investigated metonymic uses of the anthroponym ‘Assad’, the acronyms ‘ISIL’, ‘ISIS’, ‘Daesh’ and the toponymic adjective ‘European’ from a blending theory perspective. The corpus comprised British and American politicians’ speeches covering such topics as the activity of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, the fight against ISIS, and Euromaidan. Analysis of the data revealed that the source domain of a metonymic expression which has certain cognitive salience in an utterance fuses with the target leading to the emergence of a blend. It was also found that the construction of a metonymic blend in proper names often requires activation of world knowledge which forms part of the conceptual structure of the source or target domains of a proper name.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00129.gol
2023-01-30
2024-04-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alač, M., & Coulson, S.
    (2004) The man, the key, or the car: Who or what is parked out back?Cognitive Science Online, 21, 21–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barcelona, A.
    (2011) Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. InA. Barcelona, R. Benczes & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics. Towards a consensus view (pp.7–58). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.28.02bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.02bar [Google Scholar]
  3. Berberović, S.
    (2009) Would you like to be the Michael Jordan of Linguistics? Construction of figurative meaning of personal names. InM. Brdar, M. Omazić & T. Pavičić (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to English: Fundamental, methodological, interdisciplinary and applied aspects (pp.173–200). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biernacka, E.
    (2013) A discourse dynamics investigation of metonymy in talk. PhD thesis. The Open University.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bierwiaczonek, B.
    (2013) Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brdar, M.
    (2020) Review of the bookMetonymy in language, thought and brainbyB. Bierwiaczonek. Jezikoslovje, 21(2), 237-248.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabo, R.
    (2007) When Zidane is not simply Zidane, and Bill Gates is not just Bill Gates: Or some thoughts on online construction of metaphtonymic meanings of proper names. InG. Radden, K-M. Köpcke, Th. Berg & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp.125–142). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.136.09brd
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.09brd [Google Scholar]
  8. Chilton, P.
    (2005) Manipulation, memes and metaphors: The case of Mein Kampf. InL. de Saussure & P. Schulz (Eds.), Manipulation and ideologies in the twentieth century: Discourse, language, mind (pp.5–45). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.17.03chi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.17.03chi [Google Scholar]
  9. Coulson, S., & Oakley, T.
    (2003) Metonymy and conceptual blending. InK.-U. Panther & L. L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp.51–79). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.113.06cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.113.06cou [Google Scholar]
  10. Dancygier, B.
    (2009) Genitives and proper names in constructional blends. InV. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics. (pp.161–184). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.24.13dan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.24.13dan [Google Scholar]
  11. Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
    (2014) Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Encyclopaedia Britannica: Meme
    Encyclopaedia Britannica: Meme. https://www.britannica.com/topic/meme
  13. Encyclopaedia Britannica: Regime
    Encyclopaedia Britannica: Regime. https://www.britannica.com/topic/regime
  14. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
    (1998/2001) Conceptual integration networks. Expanded web version, 10 February 2001. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1292966Original version published inCognitive Science, 2(20), 133–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2003) Metaphor, metonymy and binding. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp.133–148). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fregni, S., Heidlmayr, K., Weber, K., & Peeters, D.
    (2019) An exploratory fMRI study on metonymy and metaphor processing. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ru.nl/publish/pages/982405/fregni_thesis.pdf
  17. Gibbs, R.
    (1994) Process and products in making sense of tropes. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.252–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Herrero-Ruiz, J.
    (2018) Exaggerating and mitigating through metonymy: The case of situational and CAUSE FOR EFFECT/EFFECT FOR CAUSE metonymies. Language and Communication, 621, 51–65. 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Góralczyk, I., & Paszenda, J.
    (2017) The proper name Misiewicz as Nomen Appellativum in the current political discourse in Poland. Acta Neophilologica, XIX(2), 65–75. 10.31648/an.642
    https://doi.org/10.31648/an.642 [Google Scholar]
  20. Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S.
    (1997) Blending and metaphor. InR. W. Gibbs & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Selected papers from the 5th international cognitive linguistics conference (pp.101–124). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.175.07gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.07gra [Google Scholar]
  21. Ioannou, G.
    (2019) Metonymy and frame integration: Interfacing between concepts and discourse. Topics in Linguistics, 20(1), 1–23. 10.2478/topling‑2019‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2019-0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jackson, R., Hoffman, P., Pobric, G., & Lambon Ralph, M. A.
    (2016) The semantic network at work and rest: Differential connectivity of anterior temporal lobe subregions. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(5), 1490–1501. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2999‑15.2016
    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2999-15.2016 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jespersen, O.
    (2007) The philosophy of grammar. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jonasson, K.
    (1994) Le nom propre. Constructions et interprétations. Collection champs linguistique. Louvain-la-Neuve: Editions Duculot. 10.3917/dbu.jonas.1994.01
    https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.jonas.1994.01 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kohler, A. Th.
    (2018) What lies beneath: The revelatory power of metonymy in discourse, language planning, and higher education. PhD thesis. The University of Arizona.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Krzeszowski, T.
    (1997) Angels and devils in hell: Elements of axiology in semantics. Warsaw: Energeia.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Langacker, R.
    (1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Descriptive application. Volume21. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Marmaridou, S.
    (1989) Proper names in communication. Journal of Linguistics, 251, 355–372. 10.1017/S0022226700014146
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700014146 [Google Scholar]
  31. Markert, K., & Nissim, M.
    (2007) Metonymic proper names: a corpus based account. InA. Stefanowitsch & S. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp.152–174). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Minsky, M.
    (1974) A framework for representing knowledge. InP. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp.211–277). McGraw Hill, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L.
    (2017) Metaphor and metonymy in language and thought: A cognitive linguistic approach. SYNTHESIS PHILOSOPHICA, 641, 271–294.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Radden, G.
    (2018) Molly married money. Reflections on conceptual metonymy. InO. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy. Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues (pp.161–182). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.60.06rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.60.06rad [Google Scholar]
  35. Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
    (1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. InK.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp.17–61). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad [Google Scholar]
  36. Rapp, A., Erb, M., Grodd, W., Bartels, M., & Markert, K.
    (2011) Neural correlates of metonymy resolution. Brain and Language, 1191, 196–205. 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rosch, E.
    (1975) Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 71, 532–547. 10.1016/0010‑0285(75)90021‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90021-3 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
    (1997) Cognitive and pragmatic aspects of metonymy. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa, 6(2), 161–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (2003) The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp.109–132). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110894677.109
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677.109 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2011) Metonymy and cognitive operations. InA. Barcelona, R. Benczes & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics. Towards a consensus view (pp.103–125). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.28.06rui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.06rui [Google Scholar]
  41. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Galera-Masegosa, A.
    (2011) Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation. Language Value, 3(1), 1–29. 10.6035/LanguageV.2011.3.2
    https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2011.3.2 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schmid, H.-J.
    (2007) Entrenchment, salience, and basic levels. InD. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.117–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Sjöblom, P.
    (2016) A cognitive approach to the semantics of proper nouns. InS. Brendler (Ed.), Cognitive onomastics: A reader (pp.63–82). Hamburg: Baar.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Stolk, A., Noordzij, M. L., Verhagen, L., Volman, I., Schoffelen, J-M., Oostenveld, R., Hagoort, P. &, Toni, I.
    (2014) Cerebral coherence between communicators marks the emergence of meaning. PNAS, 111(51), 18183–18188. 10.1073/pnas.1414886111
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414886111 [Google Scholar]
  45. Thothathiri, M., Kim, A., Trueswell, A. K., & Thompson-Schill, S. L.
    (2012) Parametric effects of syntactic-semantic conflict in Broca’s area during sentence processing. Brain and Language, 1201, 259–264. 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tchesnokov, I.
    (2003) The concept EUROPE in linguistic consciousness of Russian students. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 31, 69–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Van Langendonck, W.
    (2007) Theory and typology of proper names. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197853
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197853 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ash, T., Gunn, J., Lough, J., Lutsevych, O., Nixey, J., Sherr, J., & Wolczuk, K.
    (2017) The struggle for Ukraine. Chatham House report. The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Baer, D.
    , 24February 2016 Oleksandra Matviychuk receives the Democracy Defender Award. osce.usmission.gov/congratulatory-remarks-on-the-occasion-of-the-democracy-defender-award/
  50. Brzezinski, I.
    , 10April 2014 Prepared statement. Transatlantic security challenges: Central and Eastern Europe. Hearing before the subcommittee on European affairs of the Committee on Foreign Relations, the US Senate, 113 Congress, Second session, pp. 41. https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/040219_Brzezinski_Testimony.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Cameron, D.
    , 16July 2015 Eid 2015: David Cameron’s message. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/eid-2015-david-camerons-message
  52. , 6March 2014 EU meeting on Ukraine: David Cameron’s speech. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/eu-meeting-on-ukraine-david-camerons-speech
  53. , 7September 2015 Syria: refugees and counter-terrorism. Prime Minister’s statement. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/syria-refugees-and-counter-terrorism-prime-ministers-statement
  54. Hammond, Ph.
    , 30September 2015 The Assad regime created the environment in which extremism and ISIL in particular flourished. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-assad-regime-created-the-environment-in-which-extremism-and-isil-in-particular-flourished
  55. Glynn, J.
    , 16January 2018Department of Defense press briefing by Brig. Gen. Glynn via teleconference from Baghdad, Iraq. https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/1416545/department-of-defense-press-briefing-by-brig-gen-glynn-via-teleconference-from/
    [Google Scholar]
  56. May, Th.
    , 20September 2017 PM speech at UNGA: Preventing terrorist use of the Internet. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-speech-at-unga-preventing-terrorist-use-of-the-internet
  57. McGurk, B.
    , 8July 2017 Press conference by special presidential envoy McGurk in Baghdad, Iraq. https://www.state.gov/press-conference-by-special-presidential-envoy-mcgurk-in-baghdad-iraq-3/
  58. Shields, J.
    , 25January 2017 Baroness Shields opening speech at the global counter-terrorism forum. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/baroness-shields-opening-speech-at-the-global-counter-terrorism-forum
  59. Obama, B.
  60. Pompeo, M.
    , 10January 2019 A force for good. America reinvigorated in the Middle East. https://eg.usembassy.gov/a-force-for-good-america-reinvigorated-in-the-middle-east/
  61. Tillerson, R.
    , 22March 2017 Remarks at the ministerial plenary for the global coalition working to defeat ISIS. https://www.state.gov/remarks-at-the-ministerial-plenary-for-the-global-coalition-working-to-defeat-isis/
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00129.gol
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00129.gol
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): blend; cognitive salience; conceptual integration; metonymy; proper name
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error