1887
Volume 21, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Introduction to cognitive pragmatics

 

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00162.hsu
2023-10-16
2024-06-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akmajian, A., Demers, R. A., Farmer, A. K., & Harnish, R. M.
    (2010) Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication (6th edition). Cambridge, MA & London: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ariel, M.
    (2008) Pragmatics and grammar (Cambridge textbooks in linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791314
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791314 [Google Scholar]
  3. Austin, J. L.
    (1962) How to do things with words: The William James lectures delivered in Harvard University in 1955 (1st edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brugman, C., & Lakoff, G.
    (1986) The semantics of aux-inversion and anaphora constraints. Unpublished paper: University of California at Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chomsky, N.
    (1975) Reflections on language. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
    (2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexity. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldberg, A. E.
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Green, G. M.
    (1989) Pragmatics and natural language understanding (Tutorials in cognitive science series). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Grice, H. P.
    (1975) Logic and conversation. InP. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts (pp.41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
    (2002) World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  11. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2013) Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Levinson, S. C.
    (2000) Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA&London: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Paavola, S.
    (2005) Peircean abduction: Instinct or inference?. Semiotica, 153(1/4), 131–154. 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.153‑1‑4.131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.153-1-4.131 [Google Scholar]
  16. Searle, J. R.
    (1976) A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
  17. Talmy, L.
    (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA & London: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wilson, D.
    (2005) New directions for research on pragmatics and modularity. InS. Marmaridou, K. Nikiforidou, & E. Antonopoulou (Eds.), Reviewing linguistic thought: Converging trends for the 21th century (pp.375–400). Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110920826.375
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110920826.375 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00162.hsu
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error