image of Possessive construction in the Kurdish language
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The present study investigates Possessive Constructions and domains of possession in Kalhori Kurdish (KK) from a Cognitive Linguistics perspective to reveal the arrangement of constituents and relationships between the head (possessee) and dependent (possessor). This qualitative descriptive-analytical study collected data by interviewing KK speakers in Iran. The results indicate that KK speakers employ both the B-construction (­­) and Be-construction () at the clause level to denote predicative possession characterized by [−whole-part, −kinship] relationships and [+alienable] ownership. Additionally, KK speakers were found to utilize the H-construction (/dire/) at the clause level associated with [+whole-part, +kinship] relationships and [±alienable] ownership. KK speakers also employ possession splits in nominal/attributive possession by attaching the possessor, marked by the [+human] feature, to the possessee, marked by the [±human] feature, as an affix.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aikhenvald, A. Y.
    (2013) Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic perspective. InA. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Claudi, U.
    (1986) To have or not to have: On the conceptual base of predicative possession in some African languages. Unpublished manuscript, University of Cologne.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Croft, W.
    (2013) Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Evans, V., & Green, M.
    (2006) Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Haig, G.
    (2011) Linker, relativizer, nominalizer, tense-particle. InH. Y. Foong, K. Grunow-Hårsta & J. Wrona (Eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives. Volume 1: Sino-Tibetan and Iranian languages (pp. –). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heine, B., & Claudi, U.
    (1986) On the rise of grammatical categories: Some examples from Maa (Kölner Beiträge zur Afrikanistik 13). Berlin: Reimer.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Heine, B.
    (1997) Possession: Cognitive forces, sources, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511581908
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581908 [Google Scholar]
  8. Hengeveld, K.
    (1992) Non-verbal predications: Theory, typology, diachrony. (Functional Grammar Series, 15.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110883282
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883282 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hopper, P. J.
    (1991) On some principle of grammaticalization. InE. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, , –. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  10. Labrada, J. E. R.
    (2023) Beyond alienability: Factors determining possessive classes in Piaroa. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/ling‑2022‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2022-0017 [Google Scholar]
  11. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (vol.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1993) Reference point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, , –. 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Lichtenberk, F., Vaid, J., & Chin, C. H.
    (2011) On the interpretation of alienable vs. inalienable possession: A psycholinguistic investigation. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cogl.2011.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.025 [Google Scholar]
  14. Matlin, M. W., & Farmer, A. T.
    (2015) Cognition (9th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mazzitelli, L. F.
    (2017) Predicative possession in the languages of the Circum-Baltic area. Folia Linguistica, (), –. 10.1515/flin‑2017‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2017-0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Mohammadirad, M.
    (2020) Predicative possession across Western Iranian languages. Folia Linguistica, (), –. 10.1515/flin‑2020‑2038
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2020-2038 [Google Scholar]
  17. Nichols, J.
    (1988) On alienable and inalienable possession. InW. Shipley (Eds.), In Honor of Mary Haas. Haas Festival Conference on Native American Linguistics (pp.-). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110852387.557
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852387.557 [Google Scholar]
  18. Richards, C. J., & Richard, W. S.
    (2010) Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sanford, A. J.
    (1985) Cognition and cognitive psychology. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Stassen, L.
    (2001) Predicative possession. InM. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook (pp.–). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2009) Predicative possession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2013) Predicative possession. InM. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world Atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. wals.info/chapter/117.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Stolz, T., Kettler, S., Stroh, C., & Urdze, A.
    (2008) Split possession: An areal-linguistic study of the alienability correlation and related phenomena in the languages of Europe [Studies in Language Companion Series 101], Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.101
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.101 [Google Scholar]
  24. Taylor, J.
    (1996) Possessives in English. An exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198235866.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198235866.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Vattukumpu, T.
    (2020) On possessive, existential and locative clause types in the Haisla Language. Northern Language Studies, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Watkins, C.
    (1967) Remarks on the genitive. InTo honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his 70th birthday: Vol. 3 (pp.–). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Yule, G.
    (1996) Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error