1887
image of Applying cognitive grammar to the Count/Mass Distinction
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This exploratory case study contributes to the ongoing “methodological consolidation” in Applied Cognitive Linguistics (Wirag et al. 2022). It does so by examining the relationship between pre-service English language teachers’ attitudes toward grammar teaching and their acceptance of an innovative pedagogical approach to the Count/Mass Distinction (CMD) inspired by Cognitive Grammar (CG). Eleven first-year college students at a teacher-training University College in Belgium participated in the study. A questionnaire was used to determine the participants’ beliefs about grammar and grammar teaching. Elements of a CG approach to the CMD were integrated into a lesson plan and presented to the participants. The participants were then divided into two random focus groups. The interviews followed a semi-structured format, and a thematic analysis was performed on the transcripts. The data suggests that the participants’ prior knowledge and experience, the ecological validity of the innovation, and their perceived capacity to integrate the resource into their practice, all affect their assessment of a CG-informed innovation, with the latter being the most likely to impede application. The study sheds light on how pre-service teachers’ beliefs impact the adoption of innovative pedagogical methods for teaching grammar and suggests ways to make CG more accessible to practitioners.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00187.rom
2024-06-04
2024-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Achard, M.
    (2018) Teaching usage and concepts: Toward a cognitive pedagogical grammar. Teaching usage and concepts: Toward a cognitive pedagogical grammar (pp.–). De Gruyter Mouton. RetrievedApril 15, 2024, fromhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110572186-002/html. 10.1515/9783110572186‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110572186-002 [Google Scholar]
  2. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A.
    (1974) Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness (pp. xiv, 224). Oxford: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Mc Lain, S. D.
    (1985) Action science. San Francisco: Bass Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bandura, A.
    (1994) Regulative function of perceived self-efficacy. InM. G. Rumsey, C. B. Walker & J. H. Harris (Eds.), Personnel selection and classification (pp.–). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barrot, J.
    (2016) Examining the Teaching Beliefs and Practices of Experienced ESL Teachers: A Sociocognitive-Transformative Perspective. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, , –. 10.17576/3L‑2016‑2201‑12
    https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2201-12 [Google Scholar]
  6. Basturkmen, H.
    (2012) Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. System, (), –. 10.1016/j.system.2012.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Borg, M.
    (2001) Teachers’ beliefs. ELT Journal, (), –. 10.1093/elt/55.2.186
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.2.186 [Google Scholar]
  8. Borg, S.
    (1999) Studying teacher cognition in second language grammar teaching. System, (), –. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(98)00047‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00047-5 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2003) Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1017/S0261444803001903
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2006) Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2009) English Language Teachers’ Conceptions of Research. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amp007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp007 [Google Scholar]
  12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V.
    (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, (), –. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
  13. Busch, D.
    (2010) Pre-service teacher beliefs about language learning: The second language acquisition course as an agent for change. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/1362168810365239
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810365239 [Google Scholar]
  14. Carless, D.
    (2012) Innovation in language teaching and learning. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, –. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0540
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0540 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheng, M. M. H., Chan, K.-W., Tang, S. Y. F., & Cheng, A. Y. N.
    (2009) Pre-service teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs and their conceptions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, (), –. 10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.018 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cho, K., & Kawase, Y.
    (2011) 認知言語学に基づく英語教授法の効果について : 日本人英語学習者を対象とした英語の可算・不可算名詞の指導. ARELE: Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan, , –. RetrievedMarch 24, 2024fromhttps://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/arele/22/0/22_KJ00007977418/_pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  17. De Knop, S., Boers, F., & De Rycker, A.
    (2010) Fostering Language Teaching Efficiency through Cognitive Linguistics. RetrievedApril 15, 2024, fromhttps://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal:118848. 10.1515/9783110245837
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245837 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dewaele, J.-M.
    (2017) Sampling: A thorny issue in social sciences. BAAL News, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2007) Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford university press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Drożdż, G.
    (2017) The puzzle of (un)countability in English. A study in cognitive grammar. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2020) New insights into English count and mass nouns -the Cognitive Grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics, , –. 10.1017/S1360674319000480
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674319000480 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ebsworth, M. E., & Schweers, C. W.
    (1997) What researchers say and practitioners do: Perspectives on conscious grammar instruction in the ESL classroom. Applied language learning, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Farrell, T. S., & Lim, P. C. P.
    (2005) Conceptions of grammar teaching: A case study of teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. Tesl-Ej, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ferguson, L. E., & Lunn, J.
    (2021) Teacher beliefs and epistemologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Feryok, A.
    (2008) An Armenian English language teacher’s practical theory of communicative language teaching. System, (), –. 10.1016/j.system.2007.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  26. Freeman, D.
    (2002) The hidden side of the work: Teacher knowledge and learning to teach. A perspective from north American educational research on teacher education in English language teaching. Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1017/S0261444801001720
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444801001720 [Google Scholar]
  27. Granić, A., & Marangunić, N.
    (2019) Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, (), –. 10.1111/bjet.12864
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864 [Google Scholar]
  28. Graus, J., & Coppen, P.
    (2017) The interface between student teacher grammar cognitions and learner-oriented cognitions. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12427
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12427 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hsia, H.-C., Tu, Y.-L., Chang, J.-C., & Chen, S.-C.
    (2011) The influence of teachers’ self-efficacy on innovative work behavior. International Conference on Social Science and Humanity (Vol., pp.–).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Imai, T.
    (2007) A reconsideration of how to teach count nouns and mass nouns, from the viewpoint of cognitive linguistics. Chubu chiku eigo kyoiku gatsukai kiyou, ,–.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Karavas-Doukas, E.
    (1996) Using attitude scales to investigate teachers’ attitudes to the communicative approach. ELT Journal, (), –. 10.1093/elt/50.3.187
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.3.187 [Google Scholar]
  32. Karimi, M. N., & Norouzi, M.
    (2017) Scaffolding teacher cognition: Changes in novice L2 teachers’ pedagogical knowledge base through expert mentoring initiatives. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2016.12.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.015 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kennedy, C.
    (1987) Innovating for a change: Teacher development and innovation. ELT journal, (), –. 10.1093/elt/41.3.163
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/41.3.163 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kishimoto, E.
    (2007) A suggestion for teaching countability and articles of English nouns at Junior high school in Japan: How to teach from the viewpoint of cognitive grammar. Proceedings of the seventh annual meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Berent, M. K., Carson, R. T., Michael Hanemann, W., Kopp, R. J., Mitchell, R. C., Presser, S., Ruud, P. A., Kerry Smith, V., Moody, W. R., Green, M. C., & Conaway, M.
    (2002) The impact of “No Opinion” response options on data quality non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice?Public Opinion Quarterly, (), –. 10.1086/341394
    https://doi.org/10.1086/341394 [Google Scholar]
  36. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A.
    (2015) Focus group interviewing. Handbook of practical program evaluation, –. 10.1002/9781119171386.ch20
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch20 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenges to western thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Langacker, R.
    (2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
    (2008) Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Long, M.
    (1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. InK. De Bot, R. Ginsberg & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspectives (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.2.07lon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon [Google Scholar]
  42. Lortie, D.
    (1975) Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. van Lier, L.
    (Ed.) (2004) The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑7912‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5 [Google Scholar]
  44. Macalister, J.
    (2012) Pre-service teacher cognition and vocabulary teaching. RELC Journal, , –. 10.1177/0033688212439312
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212439312 [Google Scholar]
  45. Markee, N.
    (1997) Managing curricular innovation (Vol.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Merriam, S. B.
    (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from “Case study research in education.”Oxford: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Moodie, I.
    (2016) The anti-apprenticeship of observation: How negative prior language learning experience influences English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2016.05.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.011 [Google Scholar]
  48. Murphy, R.
    (2015) Essential grammar in use (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J.
    (2017) Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods, (). 10.1177/1609406917733847
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 [Google Scholar]
  50. O’Keeffe, A., & Mark, G.
    (2017) The English Grammar Profile of learner competence: Methodology and key findings. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Pajares, M. F.
    (1992) Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, (), –. 10.3102/00346543062003307
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307 [Google Scholar]
  52. Phipps, S., & Borg, S.
    (2009) Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, (), –. 10.1016/j.system.2009.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  53. Qiu, Q., Xie, Z., Xiong, Y., & Zhou, F.
    (2021) Belief change before and after the teaching practicum among Chinese pre-service ELT teachers. Sage Open, (), –. 10.1177/21582440211004934
    https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211004934 [Google Scholar]
  54. Radden, G., & Dirven, R.
    (2007) Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. RetrievedApril 15, 2024, fromhttps://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027292339. 10.1075/clip.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.2 [Google Scholar]
  55. Rahmani Doqaruni, V.
    (2017) Communication strategies in experienced vs. inexperienced teachers’ talk: A sign of transformation in teacher cognition. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, (), –. 10.1080/17501229.2015.1009071
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1009071 [Google Scholar]
  56. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S.
    (2014) Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009024532
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024532 [Google Scholar]
  57. Roche, J., & Suñer, F.
    (2016) Metaphors and grammar teaching. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, (), –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/gcla‑2016‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2016-0008 [Google Scholar]
  58. Romero Muñoz, E.
    (2022) Teaching Form in the Action-Oriented Classroom: Can-Do!. InL. McCallum (Ed.), English Language Teaching: Theory, Research and Pedagogy. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑19‑2152‑0_15
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2152-0_15 [Google Scholar]
  59. Romero Muñoz, E., & Suñer, F.
    (2024) Applied Cognitive Linguistics. InC. Sinha & X. Wen (Eds.), Cambridge encyclopedia of Cognitive Linguistics. Manuscript submitted for publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Romero Muñoz, E., & Decorte, R.
    (2024) Exploring methodological issues in applied cognitive linguistics teaching materials. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Stake, R. E.
    (1995) The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Stam, G., & Tellier, M.
    (2022) Gesture helps second and foreign language learning and teaching. InA. Morgenstern & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Gesture in language: Development across the lifespan (pp.–). Washington: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1037/0000269‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0000269-014 [Google Scholar]
  63. Taber, K. S.
    (2017) The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, , –. 10.1007/s11165‑016‑9602‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 [Google Scholar]
  64. Tellier, M.
    (2008) Dire avec des gestes. Le Français dans le monde. Recherches et applications, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Thornbury, S.
    (1991) Metaphors we work by: EFL and its metaphors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. (2010, September18). G is for Grammar McNuggets. An A-Z of ELT. RetrievedSeptember 20, 2023, fromhttps://scottthornbury.wordpress.com/2010/09/18/g-is-for-grammar-mcnuggets/
  67. Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H.
    (2021) SLA applied: Connecting theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108559263
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108559263 [Google Scholar]
  68. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D.
    (1996) A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑5915.1996.tb01822.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x [Google Scholar]
  69. Wedell, M.
    (2009) Planning for educational change. Planning for Educational Change, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Wirag, A., Li, Y., & Zhang, B.
    (2022) Applying cognitive linguistics to foreign language teaching and learning: Addressing current research challenges. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, (), –. 10.1075/cogls.21010.wir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.21010.wir [Google Scholar]
  71. Wyatt, M., & Ončevska Ager, E.
    (2017) Teachers’ cognitions regarding continuing professional development. ELT Journal, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Yin, R. K.
    (2018) Case study research and applications (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Yuan, R., & Lee, I.
    (2014) Pre-service teachers’ changing beliefs in the teaching practicum: Three cases in an EFL context. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2014.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.02.002 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00187.rom
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00187.rom
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error