1887
image of Review of Lu, Kudrnáčová & Janda (2021): Corpus approaches to language, thought and communication
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00195.ist
2024-06-21
2024-07-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Croft, W.
    (2006) The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. InD. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp.–). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199901.269
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.269 [Google Scholar]
  2. Davies, M.
    (2012) Expanding horizons in historical linguistics with the 400-million word Corpus of Historical American English. Corpora, (), –. 10.3366/cor.2012.0024
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2012.0024 [Google Scholar]
  3. Dosedlová, A., & Lu, W.-L.
    (2019) The near-synonymy of classifiers and construal operation: A corpus-based study of ke and zhu in Chinese. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/rcl.00028.dos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00028.dos [Google Scholar]
  4. (2020) A co-varying collexeme analysis of Chinese classifiers and zhū. Online. InB. Basciano, F. Gatti & A. Morbiato (Eds.), Corpus-based research on Chinese language and linguistics (pp.–). Venice, Italy: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldberg, A.
    (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.30687/978‑88‑6969‑406‑6
    https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-406-6 [Google Scholar]
  6. Hall, E.
    (1976) Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hardie, A., & McEnery, T.
    (2010) On two traditions in corpus linguistics, and what they have in common. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, , –. 10.1075/ijcl.15.3.09har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.3.09har [Google Scholar]
  8. Hirst, G.
    (1995) Near-synonymy and the structure of lexical knowledge. InAAAI symposium on representation and acquisition of lexical knowledge: Polysemy, ambiguity, and generativity (pp.–). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hirst, G., & Edmonds, P.
    (2002) Near-synonymy and lexical choice. Computational Linguistics, (), –. 10.1162/089120102760173625
    https://doi.org/10.1162/089120102760173625 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hofstede, G.
    (1991) Cultures and organizations. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang, S.
    (2003) Doubts about complementation: A functionalist analysis. Language and Linguistics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Imo, W.
    (2015) Interactional construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, (), –. 10.1515/lingvan‑2015‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2015-0008 [Google Scholar]
  13. Lewis, R. D.
    (2005) Finland, cultural lone wolf. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Linell, P.
    (2009) Grammatical constructions in dialogue. InA. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp.–). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.9.05lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.9.05lin [Google Scholar]
  15. Lyngfelt, B., Borin, L., Ohara, K., & Torrent, T. T.
    (Eds.) (2018) Constructicography: Constructicon development across languages. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.22 [Google Scholar]
  16. McEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Tono, Y.
    (2006) Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Meyer, C. F.
    (2002) English Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511606311
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606311 [Google Scholar]
  18. Sanders, R., & Uehara, S.
    (2006) Thinking about xiang 3 in Taiwan: Some native-speaker opinions. Paper presented at the 17th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Slobin, D. I.
    (2000) Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. InS. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp.–). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.198.10slo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.198.10slo [Google Scholar]
  20. Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2011) Cognitive linguistics as a cognitive science. InM. Callies, W. R. Keller & A. Lohöfer (Eds.), Bi-directionality in the cognitive sciences (pp.–). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.30.18ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.30.18ste [Google Scholar]
  21. Wienold, G.
    (1995) Lexical and conceptual structures in expressions for movement and space: With reference to Japanese, Korean, Thai, and Indonesian as compared to English and German. InU. Egli, P. E. Pause, C. Schwarze, A. von Stechow & G. Wienold (Eds.), Lexical knowledge in the organization of language (pp.–). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.114.14wie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.114.14wie [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00195.ist
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error