1887
image of Pedagogical potential of Cognitive Grammar descriptions for the pluperfect in Spanish
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Second/foreign language grammar studies usually focus on the validation of grammatical conceptualizations with learners, sometimes overlooking the paramount need to test these conceptualizations against users’ judgements and corpus searches as a way of verifying the relevance, frequency and suitability of the items, examples or explanations before the experimental phases. This paper deals with three pre-experimental validation criteria employed to measure the pedagogical potential of Cognitive Grammar descriptions for the Spanish pluperfect: (1) learner corpus searches based on  – Corpus de Aprendices de Español –, (2) native-speaker corpus searches by means of EsTenTen-18-subcorpus from Sketch Engine, and (3) language users’ judgements. This tense rarely receives enough attention in learning materials due to its apparent simplicity in terms of both morphology and functional import. However, learner corpus searches show certain instability in its use. This paper explores the steps taken within the research project in relation to this tense, including grammatical descriptions developed within the Cognitive Grammar framework and from a temporal-epistemic perspective in an attempt to account for the variety of uses of this tense.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00199.san
2024-08-29
2024-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cadierno, T., & Hijazo Gascón, A.
    (2014) Cognitive linguistics approaches to second language Spanish. InK. L. Geeslyn (Ed.), The Handbook of Spanish Second Language Acquisition. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Castañeda Castro, A.
    (2023) A vueltas con la oposición imperfecto / pretérito perfecto simple. Ventajas descriptivas y pedagógicas de un enfoque temporal-epistémico. ELUA, , –. 10.14198/ELUA.24813
    https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA.24813 [Google Scholar]
  3. Castañeda Castro, A., & Sánchez Cuadrado, A.
    (2021) The role of metonymy in teaching the Spanish verbal system to L2/FL learners of Spanish. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, , –. 10.5209/clac.76713
    https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.76713 [Google Scholar]
  4. Croft, W.
    (2006) The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. InD. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic readings (pp.–). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199901.269
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.269 [Google Scholar]
  5. Fernández, S.
    (1997) Interlengua y análisis de errores en el aprendizaje del español como lengua extranjera. Madrid: Edelsa.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. García Fernández, L.
    (1995) La interpretación temporal de los tiempos compuestos. Verba, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. García Manga, M. C.
    (2023) Análisis del tratamiento de había cantado en materiales didácticos de ELE. Descripción, uso e interrelaciones. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, , –. 10.5209/clac.90076
    https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.90076 [Google Scholar]
  8. Geeslin, L. K.
    (2014) (ed.). The handbook of Spanish second language acquisition. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Cadierno, T., & Castañeda Castro, A.
    (2019) Lingüística cognitiva y español LE/L2. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315622842
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315622842 [Google Scholar]
  10. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2008) Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Littlemore, J., & Low, G.
    (2006) Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230627567
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627567 [Google Scholar]
  14. Llopis, R., & Hijazo Gascón, A.
    (Eds.) (2019) Applied Cognitive Linguistics and L2 acquisition and learning: research and convergence. IRAL, ().
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Martínez-Atienza, M.
    (2004) La expresión de la habitualidad en español. InL. García Fernández & B. Camus Bergareche (Eds.), El pretérito imperfecto (pp.–). Madrid: Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Radden, G., & Dirven, R.
    (2007) Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clip.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.2 [Google Scholar]
  17. Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C.
    (Eds.) (2008) Handbook of Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York & London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203938560
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938560 [Google Scholar]
  18. Tyler, A.
    (2012) Cognitive linguistics and second language learning. Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. New York & London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203876039
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876039 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00199.san
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00199.san
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error