1887
image of Metaphorical framing of political events through ENTERTAINMENT scenarios
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The article sets out to examine the source domain and its scenarios as realised in the media discourse surrounding political events in Belarus in 2021. Metaphorical scenarios are investigated considering different viewpoints, such as those presented in Lithuanian, German, and Russian media. The methodological framework is a blend of Cognitive Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies, embracing the viewpoint (Sweetser, 2012), Critical Metaphor Analysis (Charteris-Black, 2005), metaphorical scenarios (Musolff, 2016), and framing (Hart, 2014). The results demonstrate that the domain acquires multiple scenarios depending on the viewpoint. The evaluation attached to the scenarios is mostly negative; however, the viewpoint adopted in Lithuanian and German discourses is very different from Russian discourse. The former is based on Western values and targets the authoritarian regime, whereas the latter is Russian-centric, with the Western world posited as a major threat to the Belarusian and Russian societies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00206.cib
2024-11-12
2024-12-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. lrytas.lt_1
    lrytas.lt_1, 25–05–21 Birutė Vyšniauskaitė. Buvęs Lietuvos užsienio reikalų ministras: Kremlius nori veikti mūsų rankomis, o Lietuva neturi kitos išeitieshttps://www.lrytas.lt/lietuvosdiena/aktualijos/2021/05/25/news/buves-lietuvos-uzsienio-reikalu-ministras-kremlius-nori-veikti-musu-rankomis-o-lietuva-neturi-kitos-iseities-19506827
  2. lrt.lt_1
    lrt.lt_1, 23–07–21 Remigijus Žilinskas. Neteisėta migracija kaip pamirštas hibridinės karybos elementas. https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/pozicija/679/1455962/remigijus-zilinskas-neteiseta-migracija-kaip-pamirstas-hibridines-karybos-elementas
  3. delfi.lt_1
    delfi.lt_1, 29–05–21 Romas Sadauskas-Kvietkevičius. Baltarusija: kas bus toliau?https://www.delfi.lt/news/ringas/lit/romas-sadauskas-kvietkevicius-baltarusija-kas-bus-toliau.d?id=87331063
  4. delfi.lt_2
    delfi.lt_228–05–21 Paulius Gritėnas. Lietuvos dešimtmečio uždavinys — Baltarusija be Lukašenkoshttps://www.delfi.lt/news/ringas/lit/paulius-gritenas-lietuvos-desimtmecio-uzdavinys-baltarusija-be-lukasenkos.d?id=87318331
  5. 15min.lt_1
    15min.lt_1, 06–06–21 Vaidas Rusys. Neužgrimuoti Protasevičiaus riešai ir galia „perkurti“ žmogaus mąstymąhttps://www.15min.lt/naujiena/aktualu/nuomones/vaidas-rusys-neuzgrimuoti-protasevicius-riesai-ir-galia-perkurti-zmogaus-mastyma-18-1515954?
  6. Focus.de_1
    Focus.de_1: 10–11–21 Matthias Hochstätter. Im Flüchtlingsdrama klopft Merkel bei Putin an — und wir sind plötzlich erpressbar. https://www.focus.de/politik/ausland/eu/kommentar-zu-belarus-fluechtlingsdrama-merkel-klopft-bei-putin-an-und-wird-dafuer-hohen-preis-zahlen_id_24414019.html
  7. Focus.de_2
    Focus.de_2: 28–05–2021 Wolfram Weimer. Offener Brief an Lukaschenko: Wir Europäer sind es leid — treten Sie ab, Herr Diktator!https://www.focus.de/politik/ausland/kommentar-von-wolfram-weimer-dfd_id_13335888.html
  8. Spiegel.de_1
  9. Stern.de_1
    Stern.de_1: 06–02–22 Ellen Ivits. Alexander Lukaschenko will den Landesvater mimen — aber entlarvt nur den Diktator. https://www.stern.de/politik/ausland/alexander-lukaschenko-will-den-landesvater-mimen--aber-entlarvt-den-diktator--31604908.html
  10. Stern.de_2
    Stern.de_2: 13–11–21 Niels Kruse. Drei Szenarien, wie das Flüchtlingsdrama an Polens Grenze beendet werden könnte. https://www.stern.de/politik/ausland/polnisch-belarussische-grenze--so-koennte-das-fluechtlingsdrama-beendet-werden--30919078.html
  11. Welt.de_1
  12. Zeit.de_1
    Zeit.de_1: 18–02–22 Maxim Kireev. Russland und Belarus: Wladimir Putins falscher Vasall. https://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2022-02/russland-belarus-wladimir-putin-alexander-lukaschenko
  13. Zeit.de_2
    Zeit.de_2: 27–05–21 Maxim Kireev. Wladimir Putin: Widerwillige Verbrüderung. https://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2021-05/wladimir-putin-alexander-lukaschenko-russland-belarus-ryanair-zwangslandung
  14. Zeit.de_3
    Zeit.de_3: 07–12–21 Johanna Roth. Europäische Verdrängungsakrobatik. https://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2021-12/eu-asylrecht-belarusgrenze-aufweichung
  15. AiF_1
    AiF_1: 17–11–21 Глеб Иванов. « Это какой-то сюрреализм ». Приведет ли миграционный кризис к войне?https://aif.ru/politics/world/eto_kakoy-to_syurrealizm_privedet_li_migracionnyy_krizis_k_voyne
  16. KP_1
    KP_1: 11–11–21 Александр Гришин. Мир сошел с ума, или это клоуны вырвались из цирков?https://www.kp.ru/daily/28355/4502696/
  17. KP_2
    KP_2: 02–06–21 Александр КоцПротасевича мог подставить помощник Тихановскойhttps://www.kp.ru/daily/27286/4423152/
  18. RT_1
    RT_1: 06–07–21 Юлия Витязева. Говорящий манекенhttps://www.rt.ru. https://russian.rt.com/opinion/882349-vityazeva-litva-tihanovskaya-status
  19. RT_2
    RT_2: 26–05–21 Юлия Витязева. Перевести стрелки. https://www.rt.ru. https://russian.rt.com/opinion/866066-vityazeva-belorussiya-rossiya-severnyi-potok-2-sankcii
  20. RT_3
    RT_3: 24–05–21 Дмитрий Петровский Приземление. https://www.rt.ru. https://russian.rt.com/opinion/865128-petrovskii-minsk-samolet-protasevich
  21. Ahrens, K., & Jiang, M.
    (2020) Source domain verification using corpus-based tools. Metaphor and Symbol, (), –. 10.1080/10926488.2020.1712783
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2020.1712783 [Google Scholar]
  22. Badryzlova, Y., Shekhtman, N., Isaeva, E., & Kerimov, R.
    (2013) Annotating a Russian corpus of conceptual metaphor: A bottom-up approach. Proceedings of the first workshop on metaphor in NLP. Atlanta: Association for Computational Linguistics, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Bednarek, M., & Caple, H.
    (2019 [2012]) News discourse. London & New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Bogetic, K.
    (2019) Discursive metaphorical frames in newspaper texts on language change. Analysing social meanings of metaphor in public discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.17013.bog
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.17013.bog [Google Scholar]
  25. Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., & Vis, B.
    (2019) Metaphorical framing in political discourse through words vs. concepts: A meta-analysis. Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/langcog.2019.5
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.5 [Google Scholar]
  26. Burgers, C., Konijn, E., & Steen, G.
    (2016) Figurative framing: shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory, , –. 10.1111/comt.12096
    https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12096 [Google Scholar]
  27. Cameron, L., Low, G., & Maslen, R.
    (2010) Finding systematicity in metaphor use. InL. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis. Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the Humanities (). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2005) Politicians and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230501706
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501706 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2014) Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑36833‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-36833-1 [Google Scholar]
  31. Croft, W., & Cruse, A.
    (2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  32. De Landtsheer, Ch
    (2015) Media rhetoric plays the market: The logic and power of metaphors behind the financial crises since 2006. Metaphor and the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.5.2.02del
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.2.02del [Google Scholar]
  33. Deignan, A.
    (2017) From linguistic to conceptual metaphors. InE. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. –). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. DUDEN
  35. Entman, R.
    (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, (), –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01304.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Fuoli, M., Littlemore, J., & Turner, S.
    (2021) Sunken ships and screaming banshees: metaphor and evaluation in film reviews. English Language and Linguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S1360674321000046
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674321000046 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gibbs, R.
    (2017) Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphor in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hart, C.
    (2014) Discourse, grammar and ideology. Functional and cognitive perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hermann, J. B., Woll, K., & Dorst, A. G.
    (2019) Linguistic metaphor identification in German. InS. Nacey, A. G. Dorst, T. Krennmayr & W. G. Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor identification in multiple languages. MIPVU around the world (pp. –). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.22.06her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.22.06her [Google Scholar]
  40. Hidalgo-Downing, L., & Pérez-Sobrino, P.
    (2022) Developing an annotation protocol for evaluative stance and metaphor in discourse: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Text & Talk, (), –. 10.1515/text‑2021‑0096
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2021-0096 [Google Scholar]
  41. Joris, W., d’Haenens, L., & Van Gorp, B.
    (2014) The euro crisis in metaphors and frames: Focus on the press in the Low Countries. European Journal of Communication, (), –. 10.1177/0267323114538852
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114538852 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kövecses, Z.
    (2020) Extended metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108859127
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (2003 [1980]) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Langacker, R.
    (2007) Cognitive grammar. InD. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. –). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Martin, J., & White, P. R. R.
    (2005) The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  46. Motyl, A. J.
    (2016) Putin’s Russia as a fascist political system. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Special Issue: Between Nationalism, Authoritarianism, and Fascism in Russia: Exploring Vladimir Putin’s Regime, (), –. 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2016.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2016.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  47. Musolff, A.
    (2016) Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Ngai, J.
    (2022) Evaluation across newspaper genres. Hard news stories, editorials and feature articles. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003150640
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003150640 [Google Scholar]
  49. OED
  50. Rein, M., & Schön, D.
    (1993) Reframing policy discourse. InF. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. –). Durham, NC: Duke University. 10.1215/9780822381815‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822381815-007 [Google Scholar]
  51. Reinierse, G.
    (2021) Introducing MSDIP: A method for coding source domains in metaphor analysis [Webinar paper]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Ritchie, D.
    (2003) “ARGUMENT IS WAR” – Or is it a game of chess? Multiple meanings in the analysis of implicit metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, (), –. 10.1207/S15327868MS1802_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1802_4 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rosch, E. H.
    (1973) Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, (), –. 10.1016/0010‑0285(73)90017‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
  54. Rundell, M.
    (Ed.) (2002) Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners. Oxford: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Semino, E.
    (2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Hardie, A., Payne, S., & Rayson, P.
    (2018a) Metaphor, cancer and the end of life. A corpus-based study. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Semino, E., Demjén, Z., & Demmen, J.
    (2018b) An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Snyder, T.
    (2018) The road to unfreedom. Russia, Europe, America. New York: Tim Duggan Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Steen, G.
    (1999) From linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five steps. InR. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. –). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.175.05ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.05ste [Google Scholar]
  60. Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  61. Sweetser, E.
    (2012) Viewpoint and perspective in language and gesture, from the ground down. InB. Dancyger & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language (pp. –). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084727.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084727.002 [Google Scholar]
  62. Thompson, G., & Hunston, S.
    (2000) Evaluation: An introduction. InS. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. –). Oxford: University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  63. Urbonaitė, J., Šeškauskienė, I., & Cibulskienė, J.
    (2019) Linguistic metaphor identification in Lithuanian. InS. Nacey, A. G. Dorst, T. Krennmayr & W. G. Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor identification in multiple languages. MIPVU around the world (pp. –). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.22.08urb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.22.08urb [Google Scholar]
  64. Van Gorp, B.
    (2010) Strategies to take subjectivity out of framing analysis. InD’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. –). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Verhagen, A.
    (2007) Construal and perspectivisation. InD. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. –). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00206.cib
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00206.cib
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: scenario ; viewpoint ; media discourse ; metaphorical framing ; Belarusian political crisis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error